Skip to main content
×
×
Home

When Informality Advantages Women: Quota Networks, Electoral Rules and Candidate Selection in Mexico

  • Jennifer M. Piscopo
Abstract

As gender quotas change the formal rules governing candidate selection, party leaders use informal practices in order to preserve the choicest candidacies for men. This article uses a critical case to highlight how the opposite also occurs. In Mexico, female elites built informal, cross-partisan networks that, in collaboration with state regulators, successfully eliminated political parties’ practices of allocating women the least-viable candidacies. Traditional party elites rely on informal tactics to secure the status quo, but female party members devise their own strategies to force changes to candidate selection, signalling that informality cannot be theorized as wholly negative for women.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Jennifer M. Piscopo is Assistant Professor of Politics at Occidental College, Los Angeles. Contact email: piscopo@oxy.edu.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Alanís Figueroa, M. (2013), ‘Justicia electoral con enfoque de género’, in J. Alcocer V. (ed.), Cuota de género: Una sentencia histórica (México, DF: Nuevo Horizonte): 7597.
Aparicio, J. (2011), Cuotas de género en México: Candidaturas y resultados electorales para diputados federales 2009 (México, DF: Temas Selectos de Derecho Electoral 18).
Baldez, L. (2004), ‘Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 24(2): 231258.
Baldez, L. (2007), ‘Primaries v. Quotas: Gender and Candidate Nominations in Mexico, 2003’, Latin American Politics and Society, 49(3): 6996.
Bjarnegård, E. and Kenny, M. (2016), ‘Comparing Candidate Selection: A Feminist Institutionalist Approach’, Government and Opposition, 51(3): 370392.
Bruhn, K. (2003), ‘Whores and Lesbians: Political Activism, Party Strategies, and Gender Quotas in Mexico’, Electoral Studies, 22(1): 101119.
Camil, J. (2009), ‘Las Juanitas de San Lázaro’, La Jornada, 18 September.
CEAMEG (2012), ‘Información analítica 2012’ (México, DF), http://archivos.diputados.gob.mx/Centros_Estudio/ceameg/ias/IAs_2011.swf.
Collier, D. (2011), ‘Understanding Process Tracing’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4): 823830.
Crocker, A. (ed.) (2011), Diffusion of Gender Quotas in Latin America and Beyond (New York: Peter Lang).
Eisenstadt, T.A. (2003), ‘Thinking Outside the (Ballot) Box: Informal Electoral Institutions and Mexico’s Political Opening’, Latin American Politics and Society, 45(1): 2554.
Estévez, F., Magar, E. and Rosas, G. (2008), ‘Partisanship in Non-partisan Electoral Agencies and Democratic Compliance: Evidence from Mexico’s Electoral Institute’, Electoral Studies, 27(2): 257271.
Franceschet, S. and Piscopo, J.M. (2008), ‘Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina’, Politics and Gender, 4(3): 393425.
Franceschet, S. and Piscopo, J.M. (2014), ‘Sustaining Gendered Practices? Power and Elite Networks in Argentina’, Comparative Political Studies, 47(1): 85110.
Hinojosa, M. (2012), Selecting Women, Electing Women (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
IFE (Federal Electoral Institute) (2012a), Informe sobre la evolución normativa y las medidas afirmativas para la aplicación efectiva de las cuotas de género en el proceso electoral federal 2011–2012 (Mexico City: IFE).
IFE (Federal Electoral Institute) (2012b), Proceso electoral federal: 2011–2012 (Mexico City: IFE).
Johnson, N. (2016), ‘Keeping Men In, Shutting Women Out: Gender Biases in Candidate Selection Processes in Uruguay’, Government and Opposition, 51(3): 393415.
Jones, M.P. (2009), ‘Gender Quota Laws and the Election of Women: Evidence from the Latin American Vanguard’, Comparative Political Studies, 42(1): 5681.
Kenny, M. (2014), ‘A Feminist Institutionalist Approach’, Politics and Gender, 10(4): 679684.
Kenny, M. and Verge, T. (2013), ‘Decentralization, Political Parties, and Women’s Representation: Evidence from Spain and Britain’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 43(1): 109128.
Krook, M.L. (2009), Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide (New York: Oxford University Press).
Langston, J. (2008), ‘Legislative Recruitment in Mexico’, in P. Siavelis and S. Morgenstern (eds), Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press): 143163.
Langston, J. and Aparicio, J. (2011), Gender Quotas Are Not Enough: How Background, Experience and Campaigning Affect Electoral Outcomes, Working Paper 234 (Mexico City: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas).
Llanos, B. and Sample, K. (2008), 30 Years of Democracy: Riding the Wave? Women’s Political Participation in Latin America (Lima: International Idea).
Lovenduski, J. (1998), ‘Gendering Research in Political Science’, Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1): 333356.
Lovenduski, J. (2005), Feminizing Politics (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Medina Espino, A. (2010), La participación política de las mujeres. De las cuotas de género a la paridad (México, DF: CEAMEG).
Murray, R. (2010), Parties, Gender Quotas, and Candidate Selection in France (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
ONU Mujeres (2013), Participación política de las mujeres en México (Mexico City: ONU Mujeres).
Ortiz Ortega, A. and Scherer Castillo, C. (2014), Contigo aprendí: una lección de democracia gracias a la sentencia 12624 (Mexico City: Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación).
Piscopo, J.M. (2015), ‘States as Gender Equality Activists: The Evolution of Quota Laws in Latin America’, Latin American Politics and Society, 57(3): 2942.
Reyes, J.M. (2012), ‘El tribunal de los militantes: el control judicial de los conflictos intrapartidistas en México’, América Latina Hoy, 62: 131153.
Rodríguez, V.E. (2003), Women in Contemporary Mexican Politics (Austin: University of Texas Press).
Roza, V. (2010), ‘Gatekeepers to Power: Party-Level Influences on Women’s Political Participation in Latin America’, unpublished PhD dissertation (Washington, DC, Georgetown University).
Sacchet, T. (2008), ‘Beyond Numbers: The Impact of Gender Quotas in Latin America’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 10(3): 369386.
Sagot, M. (2010), ‘Does the Political Participation of Women Matter? Democratic Representation, Affirmative Action, and Quotas in Costa Rica’, IDS Bulletin, 41(5): 2534.
Saiegh, S.M. (2010), ‘Active Players or Rubber Stamps? An Evaluation of the Policymaking Roles of Latin American Legislatures’, in C. Scartascini, E. Stein and M. Tommasi (eds), How Democracy Works (Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank): 4775.
Sauri Riancho, D.M. (2010), ‘De las Adelitas a las Juanitas’, personal blog, 21 January, http://dulcesauri.blogspot.mx/2010/01/de-las-adelitas-las-juanitas-la-lucha.html.
Schedler, A. (2005), ‘From Electoral Authoritarianism to Democratic Consolidation’, in R. Crandall, G. Paz and R. Roett (eds), Mexico’s Democracy at Work (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers): 938.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. (2009), ‘Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(1): 528.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. (2010), Political Power and Women’s Representation in Latin America (New York: Oxford University Press).
Tansey, O. (2007), ‘Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(4): 765772.
Tarrés, M.L. (2006), ‘The Political Participation of Women in Contemporary Mexico, 1980–2000’, in L. Randall (ed.), Changing Structure of Mexico (New York: M.E. Sharpe): 406423.
Torres, M. (2009), ‘Los “candidatos juanitos”’, CNN México, 5 December.
Verge, T. and de la Fuente, M. (2014), ‘Playing with Different Cards: Party Politics, Gender Quotas, and Women’s Empowerment’, International Political Science Review, 35(1): 6379.
Verge, T. and Espírito-Santo, A. (2016), ‘Interactions between Party and Legislative Quotas: Candidate Selection and Quota Compliance in Portugal and Spain’, Government and Opposition, 51(3): 416439.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed