Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T13:48:23.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Portrait of a Greek Gentleman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Extract

‘I never looke upon an author’, says Montaigne, ‘be they such as write of vertue and of actions, but I curiously endevour to find out what he was himselfe.… Plutarke's compositions, if they be well savored, do plainly manifest the same unto us: and I am perswaded I know him inwardly: yet would I be glad we had some memories of his owne life.’ What we know of the externals of Plutarch's life can in fact be put in a few sentences. Born shortly before the middle of the first century a.d., a member of an old Boeotian family in easy circumstances, he combined with the ordinary occupations of a country gentleman the profession of lecturing, though it is improbable that he charged any fees for his courses. His devotion to the municipal affairs of Chaeronea involved him in various missions, one of which took him to Rome while still a young man, in the principate of Vespasian. Here his days were occupied by lecturing and what he grandly calls ‘political business’, his evenings by dinner parties; so that he had no time, he tells us, to practise himself in the Roman tongue. In his youth he visited Alexandria also, perhaps for his studies; and we find him at Rome again under Domitian, perhaps collecting materials for the Roman biographies. But his later years were passed, so far as our knowledge goes, between Chaeronea, where he kept a sort of school for gentlemen's sons and held a succession of municipal offices, and Delphi, where he was a member of the priestly college. He married the daughter of a fellow citizen; begot five children (two of whom died in childhood); and himself lived to a ripe age. Practically the whole of this meagre curriculum vitae has been constructed out of scattered references in Plutarch's own writings. Almost the only piece of extraneous evidence is Suidas' statement that Trajan made him consul in his old age: this I have some difficulty in crediting, for there is no hint anywhere in his writings of his having held high office or of any personal relations which could explain Trajan's act—and Plutarch was hardly the man to leave his honours unmentioned. If he has told us little of the outward tenor of his life, I suspect that there was little to tell. He likens it himself to a well-written manuscript, wherein are few erasures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 97 note 1 Ess. ii. 31.Google Scholar

page 97 note 2 Cf. De Stoic. rep. 20 fin.

page 97 note 3 Demosth. 2.

page 97 note 4 His death seems to fall between a.d. 120 and 130 (Volkmann, Plutarch, 91).

page 97 note 5 Cf. Gréard, Morale de Plutarque, 3 ff.

page 97 note 6 Consol. ad uxorem, 8.Google Scholar

page 98 note 1 De sera numinum vindicta, 16.

page 98 note 2 Demosth. 2.

page 98 note 3 De exilio, 3.

page 98 note 4 Alex. 1.

page 99 note 1 De aud. 17, trans. Philemon Holland.

page 99 note 2 Ibid. 18.

page 99 note 3 Ibid. 8.

page 99 note 4 Ibid. 13–15.

page 99 note 5 Ibid. 16.

page 100 note 1 De aud. 12.Google Scholar

page 100 note 2 Coniug. praecept. 48.Google Scholar

page 100 note 3 De Stoic. rep. 21.Google Scholar

page 101 note 1 De tuend. san. 19.Google Scholar

page 101 note 2 De garrul. 4.Google Scholar

page 101 note 3 Symp. 1. iv. 2 (the speaker is not Plutarch, but evidently has his approval).

page 101 note 4 Ibid. VII. vii.

page 101 note 5 De tuend. san. 17.

page 101 note 6 Charact. 30 (17).

page 102 note 1 De superstit. 4.

page 102 note 2 Ibid. 11.

page 102 note 3 De audiendo, 1.

page 102 note 4 De superstit. 3.

page 102 note 5 Ibid. 12.

page 102 note 6 Ibid. 3.

page 102 note 7 De tranquill. anim. 20.

page 102 note 8 De facie, 21.

page 102 note 9 De superstit. 9.

page 103 note 1 Coniug. praecept. 14, 15, 19.

page 103 note 2 Ibid. 32.

page 103 note 3 Ibid. 34.

page 103 note 4 Ibid. 33.

page 103 note 5 Ibid. 45.

page 103 note 6 Ibid. 47.

page 103 note 7 De cohib. ira, 11: cf. the anecdote about Plutarch in Aulus Gellius, i. 26.

page 103 note 8 Cato mai. 5.

page 104 note 1 De soll. anim. 1–7.

page 104 note 2 Ibid. 8.

page 104 note 3 Cf. De tuend. san. 18, where he justifies moderate flesh-eating on the ground that habit is ‘second nature’ (φύσις του̃ παρὰ φύσιν).

page 105 note 1 De soll. anim. 19. 12, 13.Google Scholar

page 105 note 2 Ibid. 23–4.

page 105 note 3 Symp. IV. V. 3.

page 105 note 4 Ibid. III. iii.

page 106 note 1 Symp. v. vii. 1.

page 106 note 2 De tuend. san. 20.Google Scholar

page 106 note 3 Ibid. 16, 21.

page 106 note 4 De garrul. 4.Google Scholar

page 106 note 5 Ibid. 22.

page 106 note 6 Ibid. 23.