Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-b2xwp Total loading time: 0.359 Render date: 2022-10-05T14:30:15.548Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

The ten characteristics of the high-performing chronic care system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2010

Chris Ham*
Affiliation:
Professor of Health Policy and Management, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
*
Correspondence to: Chris Ham, Professor of Health Policy and Management, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham B15 2RT, UK. Email: c.j.ham@bham.ac.uk

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe the characteristics of the high-performing chronic care system and the four implementation strategies needed to achieve such a system. The paper starts with a description of the Chronic Care Model and summarises evidence on its impact. This is followed by a review of international evidence on gaps in the quality of chronic care. These gaps suggest that, useful and influential as the Chronic Care Model is, more is needed to help health care decision makers bring about the reorientation required to meet the needs of populations in which chronic diseases predominate. The second half of the paper therefore sets out the ten characteristics and four implementation strategies required to achieve a high-performing chronic care system. In doing so, it provides practical guidance to policy makers and health care leaders on the most promising strategies for improving the provision of chronic care, drawing on evidence from the experience of England, New Zealand and USA.

Type
Perspective
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashton, C., Souchek, J., Petersen, N., Menke, T., Collins, T., Kizer, K., Wright, S.Wray, N. (2003), ‘Hospital use and survival among veterans affairs beneficiaries’, New England Journal of Medicine, 349: 16371646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, J., Dixon, J., Mijanovich, T.Wennberg, D. (2006), ‘Case finding of patients at risk of readmission to hospital: development of algorithm to identify high risk patients’, British Medical Journal, 333: 327330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boaden, R., Dusheiko, M., Gravelle, H., Parker, S., Pickard, S., Roland, M., Sargent, P.Sheaff, R. (2006), Evaluation of the Evercare Approach to Case Management: Final Report, Manchester: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, T. (2008), ‘Coordinating care – a perilous journey through the health care system’, New England Journal of Medicine, 358: 10641070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenheimer, T., Wagner, E.Grumbach, K. (2002), ‘Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. The Chronic Care Model, Part 2’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 288: 19091914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Middleton, E., Sibblad, B.Roland, M. (2007), ‘Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance’, New England Journal of Medicine, 357: 181190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chronic Disease Prevention (2007), Retrieved 11 July 2009, http://www.cdc.gov/NCCDPHPGoogle Scholar
Congressional Budget Office (2004), An Analysis of the Literature on Disease Management Programmes, CBO: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Crosson, F. J. (2003), ‘Kaiser Permanente: a propensity for partnership’, British Medical Journal, 326: 654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darkins, A.. (2007), ‘The Use of Assistive Technologies by Patients at Home in Improving Care Coordination’, Paper prepared for The Commonwealth Fund and The Nuffield Trust 8th International Meeting on Quality of Health Care. Pennyhill Park, Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
Dixon, J., Lewis, R., Rosen, R., Finlayson, B.Gray, D. (2004), Managing Chronic Disease: What Can We Learn From the US Experience, London: King’s Fund.Google Scholar
Doran, T., Fullwood, C., Gravelle, H., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Hiroeh, U.Roland, M. (2006), ‘Pay-for-performance in family practices in the United Kingdom’, New England Journal of Medicine, 355: 375384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, R., Orleans, T., Wagner, E., Curry, S.Solberg, L. (2001), ‘Does the Chronic Care Model serve also as a template for improving prevention?’, The Milbank Quarterly, 79(4): 579612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grumbach, K.Bodenheimer, T. (2004), ‘Can health care teams improve primary care practice?’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 291: 12461251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, D., Rundall, T., Tallia, A., Cohen, D., Halpin, H.Crabtree, B. (2007), ‘Rethinking prevention in primary care: applying the Chronic Care Model to address health risk behaviours’, The Milbank Quarterly, 85(1): 6991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Medicine (2001), Crossing the Quality Chasm, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Jha, A., Perlin, J., Kizer, K.Dudley, R. (2003), ‘Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Health care system on the quality of care’, New England Journal of Medicine, 348: 22182227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, R., Priester, R.Totten, A. (2005), Meeting the Challenge of Chronic Illness, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A., et al. (2007), ‘The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(3): 254261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, E.Fleming, B. (2007), ‘Making performance indicators work: experiences of US Veterans Health Administration’, British Medical Journal, 335: 971973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, S. (2004), ‘Is Kaiser the future of American health care?’, New York Times, 31 October.Google Scholar
Longman, P. (2005), ‘The best care anywhere’, The Washington Monthly, January/February.Google Scholar
Lorig, K., Seleznick, M., Lubeck, D., Ung, E., Chastain, R. L.Holman, H. R. (1989), ‘The beneficial outcomes of the arthritis self-management course are not adequately explained by behaviour change’, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 32: 9195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McWilliams, J. M., Meara, E., Zaslavsky, A. M.Ayanian, J. Z. (2007), ‘Health of previously uninsured adults after acquiring Medicare coverage’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(24): 28862894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Health Committee (2007), Meeting the Needs of People with Chronic Conditions, Wellington: National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability.Google Scholar
National Health Priority Action Council (2006), National Chronic Disease Strategy, Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.Google Scholar
Newhouse, J. and the Insurance Experiment Group (1993), Free for All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, S., Steed, L.Mulligan, K. (2004), ‘Self-management interventions for chronic illness’, The Lancet, 363: 15231537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, A. (2007), ‘The Veterans Health Administration: an American success story?’, The Milbank Quarterly, 85: 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M.Teisberg, E. (2006), Redefining Health Care, Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Olshansky, S., Passaro, D., Hershow, R., Layden, J., Carnes, B., Brody, J., Hayflick, L., Butler, R., Allison, D.Ludwig, D. (2005), ‘A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century’, New England Journal of Medicine, 352: 11381145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, M. L., Wu, S. Y., Schaefer, J., Bonomi, A. E., Shortell, S. M., Mendell, P. J., Marsteller, J. A., Louis, T. A., Rosen, M.Keeler, E. B. (2005), ‘Assessing the implementation of the Chronic Care Model in quality improvement collaboratives’, Health Services Research, 40(4): 978996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renders, C., Valk, G., Griffin, S., Wagner, E., van Eijk, J.Assendelft, W. (2001), ‘Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings’, Diabetes Care, 24: 18211833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Huynh, P., Doty, M., Peugh, J.Zapert, K. (2006), ‘On the front line of care: primary care doctors’ office systems, experiences and views in seven countries’, Health Affairs, 25: w555w571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Doty, M., Bishop, M., Peugh, J.Murukutla, N. (2007), ‘Toward higher-performance health systems: adults’ health care experiences in seven countries, 2007’, Health Affairs, 26(6): w717w734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D. (2005a), Transforming Chronic Care: Evidence about Improving Care for People with Long-Term Conditions, Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Singh, D. (2005b), Which Staff Improve Care for People with Long Term Conditions?, Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Singh, D.Ham, C. (2006), Improving Care for People with Long-Term Conditions: A Review of UK and International Frameworks, Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, and NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement.Google Scholar
Sobel, D. (1995), ‘Rethinking medicine: improving health outcomes with cost-effective psychosocial interventions’, Psychosomatic Medicine, 57: 234244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starfield, B., Lemke, K., Bernhardt, T., Foldes, S., Forrest, C.Weiner, J. (2003), ‘Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in ‘case’ management’, Annals of Family Medicine, 1: 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starfield, B., Shi, L.Mackino, J. (2005), ‘Contribution of primary care to health systems and health’, The Milbank Quarterly, 83: 457502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Commonwealth Fund (2006), Framework for the High Performance Health System in the United States, New York: The Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
Tsai, A., Morton, S., Mangione, C.Keeler, E. (2005), ‘A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses’, The American Journal of Managed Care, 11: 478488.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. (1998), ‘Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?’, Effective Clinical Practice, 1: 24.Google Scholar
Wolff, J., Starfield, B.Anderson, G. (2002), ‘Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly’, Archives of Internal Medicine, 162: 22692276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organisation Europe (2006), Gaining Health: The European Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation (2005), Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Vital Investment, Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Zwar, A., Harris, N. M., Griffiths, R., Roland, M., Dennis, S., Powell Davies, G.Hasan, I. (2006), A Systematic Review of Chronic Disease Management, Canberra: Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute.Google Scholar
94
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The ten characteristics of the high-performing chronic care system
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The ten characteristics of the high-performing chronic care system
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The ten characteristics of the high-performing chronic care system
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *