Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:01:59.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Publicly funded health insurance schemes and demand for health services: evidence from an Indian state using a matching estimator approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2024

Vanita Singh*
Affiliation:
Economics and Public Policy, Management Development Institute, Gurgaon, India

Abstract

Using Demographic and Health Survey data (2015–16) from the state of Andhra Pradesh, we estimate the differential probability of hysterectomy (removal of uterus) for women (aged 15–49 years) covered under publicly funded health insurance (PFHI) schemes relative to those not covered. To reduce the extent of selection bias into treatment assignment (PFHI coverage) we use matching methods, propensity score matching, and coarsened exact matching, achieving a comparable treatment and control group. We find that PFHI coverage increases the probability of undergoing a hysterectomy by 7–11 percentage points in our study sample. Sub-sample analysis indicates that the observed increase is significant for women with lower education levels and higher order parity. Additionally, we perform a test of no-hidden bias by estimating the treatment effect on placebo outcomes (doctor's visit, health check-up). The robustness of the results is established using different matching specifications and sensitivity analysis. The study results are indicative of increased demand for surgical intervention associated with PFHI coverage in our study sample, suggesting a need for critical evaluation of the PFHI scheme design and delivery in the context of increasing reliance on PFHI schemes for delivering specialised care to poor people, neglect of preventive and primary care, and the prevailing fiscal constraints in the healthcare sector.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadie, A and Imbens, GW (2006) Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74, 235267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abadie, A and Imbens, GW (2011) Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 29, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abadie, A and Imbens, GW (2016) Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 84, 781807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlas, A, Milanese, S, Grimmer, K, Barras, S and Stephens, JH (2019) Sources of information used by patients prior to elective surgery: a scoping review. Bmj Open 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research 46, 399424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barros, PP, Machado, MP and Sanz-de-Galdeano, A (2008) Moral hazard and the demand for health services: a matching estimator approach. Journal of Health Economics 27, 10061025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, SO and Caliendo, M (2007) Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects. Stata Journal 7, 7183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergkvist, S, Wagstaff, A, Katyal, A, Singh, PV, Samarth, A and Rao, M (2014) What a difference a state makes: health reform in Andhra Pradesh. Policy Research Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, M, Iacus, S, King, G and Porro, G (2009) CEM: coarsened exact matching in Stata. The Stata Journal 9, 524546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caliendo, M and Kopeinig, S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys 22, 3172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, DM (1995) The incidence of adverse medical outcomes under prospective payment. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, DM and Lleras-Muney, A (2012) Education and health: insights from international comparisons. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Working Paper Series. 17738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, DM and Zeckhauser, RJ (2000) The anatomy of health insurance. In Culyer AJ and Newhouse JP (eds), Handbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 563643.Google Scholar
Dehejia, RH and Wahba, S (1999) Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, 10531062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehejia, RH and Wahba, S (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and statistics 84, 151161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira, IT, Dias, JG and Padmadas, SS (2014) Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact. PLoS ONE 9, e86654e86654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086654CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, S (2016) Pragmatic prevention, permanent solution: women's experiences with hysterectomy in rural India. Social Science and Medicine 151, 1118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, S, Sinha, T and Mahal, A (2011) Prevalence of hysterectomy among rural and urban women with and without health insurance in Gujarat, India. Reproductive Health Matters 19, 4251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, S, Sinha, T, Mahal, A and Cousens, S (2014) Understanding CBHI hospitalisation patterns: a comparison of insured and uninsured women in Gujarat, India. BMC Health Services Research 14, 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, S, Campbell, OMR, Sinha, T, Mahal, A and Cousens, S (2017) Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India. Health Policy and Planning 32, 6878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, S, Shuka, A, Nambiar, D and Ved, R (2019) Patterns of hysterectomy in India: a national and state-level analysis of the fourth national family health survey (2015–2016). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 126, 7280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devadasan, N, Criel, B, Van Damme, W, Lefevre, P, Manoharan, S and Van der Stuyft, P (2011) Community health insurance schemes & patient satisfaction-evidence from India. The Indian Journal of Medical Research 133, 40.Google ScholarPubMed
Ellis, RP and McGuire, TG (1986) Provider behavior under prospective reimbursement: cost sharing and supply. Journal of Health Economics 5, 129151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, JM and Frisvold, DE (2009) Higher education and health investments: does more schooling affect preventive health care use? Journal of Human Capital 3, 144176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garg, S, Bebarta, KK and Tripathi, N (2020) Performance of India's national publicly funded health insurance scheme, Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogaya Yojana (PMJAY), in improving access and financial protection for hospital care: findings from household surveys in Chhattisgarh state. BMC Public Health 20, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrido, MM, Kelley, AS, Paris, J, Roza, K, Meier, DE, Sean Morrison, R and Aldridge, MD (2014) Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Services Research 49, 17011720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghosh, S (2014) Equity in the utilization of healthcare services in India: evidence from National Sample Survey. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2, 2938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghosh, S (2018) Publicly financed health insurance schemes. Economic and Political Weekly 53, 1618.Google Scholar
Ghosh, S and Gupta, ND (2017) Targeting and effects of Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana on access to care and financial protection. Economic and Political Weekly 52, 6170.Google Scholar
Iacus, SM, King, G and Porro, G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis 20, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayakrishnan, T, Jeeja, MC, Kuniyil, V and Paramasivam, S (2016) Increasing out-of-pocket health care expenditure in India-due to supply or demand. Pharmacoeconomics 1, 2.Google Scholar
Kaur, S, Jain, N and Desai, S (2019) National Health Authority (NHA) Working Paper Series 001 - Ayushman Bharat. National Health Authority. https://www.pmjay.gov.in/sites/default/files/2019-07/NHA Working paper series 001 .pdfGoogle Scholar
Khetrapal, S, Acharya, A and Mills, A (2019) Assessment of the public–private-partnerships model of a national health insurance scheme in India. Social Science and Medicine 243, 112634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, G and Nielsen, R (2019) Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political Analysis 27, 435454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Forgia, G and Nagpal, S (2012) Government-Sponsored Health Insurance in India: Are You Covered?. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9618-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, India (2017) Report of National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015–16. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR339/FR339.pdf (accessed December 2020).Google Scholar
Nandi, A, Holtzman, EP, Malani, A and Laxminarayan, R (2015) The need for better evidence to evaluate the health & economic benefits of India's Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana. The Indian Journal of Medical Research 142, 383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nandi, S, Schneider, H and Dixit, P (2017) Hospital utilization and out of pocket expenditure in public and private sectors under the universal government health insurance scheme in Chhattisgarh State, India: Lessons for universal health coverage. PloS One 12, e0187904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nandi, S, Schneider, H and Garg, S (2018) Assessing geographical inequity in availability of hospital services under the state-funded universal health insurance scheme in Chhattisgarh state, India, using a composite vulnerability index. Global Health Action 11, 1541220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinja, S, Chauhan, AS, Karan, A, Kaur, G and Kumar, R (2017) Impact of publicly financed health insurance schemes on healthcare utilization and financial risk protection in India: a systematic review. PloS One 12, e0170996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prusty, RK, Choithani, C and Gupta, SD (2018) Predictors of hysterectomy among married women 15–49 years in India. Reproductive Health 15, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0445-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranjan, A, Dixit, P, Mukhopadhyay, I and Thiagarajan, S (2018) Effectiveness of government strategies for financial protection against costs of hospitalization care in India. BMC Public Health 18, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, KD, Shahrawat, R and Bhatnagar, A (2016 a) Composition and distribution of the health workforce in India: estimates based on data from the National Sample Survey. WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.4103/2224-3151.206250Google ScholarPubMed
Rao, M, Singh, PV, Katyal, A, Samarth, A, Bergkvist, S, Renton, A and Netuveli, G (2016 b) Has the Rajiv Aarogyasri community health insurance scheme of Andhra Pradesh addressed the educational divide in accessing health care? PLoS ONE 11, e0145707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, S and Mary, I (2013 a) Aarogyasri scheme in Andhra Pradesh, India: some critical reflections. Social Change 43, 245261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, S and Mary, I (2013 b) Rajiv Aarogyasri Community Health Insurance Scheme in Andhra Pradesh, India: a comprehensive analytic view of private public partnership model. Indian Journal of Public Health 57, 254259. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-557X.123264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichardt, CS (2019) Quasi-Experimentation: A Guide to Design and Analysis. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Reshmi, B, Unnikrishnan, B, Rajwar, E, Parsekar, SS, Vijayamma, R and Venkatesh, BT (2021) Impact of public-funded health insurances in India on health care utilisation and financial risk protection: a systematic review. BMJ Open 11, e050077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ripollone, JE, Huybrechts, KF, Rothman, KJ, Ferguson, RE and Franklin, JM (2020) Evaluating the utility of coarsened exact matching for pharmacoepidemiology using real and simulated claims data. American Journal of Epidemiology 189, 613622. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenbaum, PR and Rubin, DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70, 4155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, PR and Rubin, DB (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician 39, 3338.Google Scholar
Scialli, AR (1998) Alternatives to hysterectomy for benign conditions. International Journal of Fertility and Women's Medicine 43, 186191.Google ScholarPubMed
Singh, V and Sivakami, M (2014) Menopause: midlife experiences of low socio-economic strata women in Haryana. Sociological Bulletin 63, 263286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, PM and Cook, D (2013) Matching and propensity scores. In Little TD (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods, Vol. 237. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, SY and Melendez-Torres, GJ (2018) Do prospective payment systems (PPSs) lead to desirable providers’ incentives and patients’ outcomes? A systematic review of evidence from developing countries. Health Policy and Planning 33, 137153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vera-Hernández, ÁM (1999) Duplicate coverage and demand for health care. The case of Catalonia. Health Economics 8, 579598.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yellaiah, J (2013) Health insurance in India: Rajiv Aarogyasri health insurance scheme in Andhra Pradesh. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 8, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z, Kim, HJ, Lonjon, G and Zhu, Y (2019) Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching. Annals of Translational Medicine 7, 16–27.Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Singh supplementary material

Singh supplementary material
Download Singh supplementary material(File)
File 34 KB