Our Scholarly Practices Are Derailing Our Progress: The Importance of “Nothing” in the Organizational Sciences

Ronald S. Landis; Steven G. Rogelberg

doi:10.1111/iops.12054

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

References

Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News, 68, 314–316.Google Scholar

Cascio, W. F. (1995). Whither industrial and organization psychology in a changing world of work. American Psychologist, 50, 928–939.Google Scholar

Kepes, S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). How trustworthy is the scientific literature in I-O psychology? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(3), 252–268.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kruschke, J. K., Aguinis, H., & Joo, H. (2012). The time has come: Bayesian methods for data analysis in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15(4), 722–752.Google Scholar

Ryan, A. M., & Ford, J. K. (2010). Organizational psychology and the tipping point of professional identity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 241–258.Google Scholar

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Landis, Ronald S. James, Lawrence R. Lance, Charles E. Pierce, Charles A. and Rogelberg, Steven G. 2014. When is Nothing Something? Editorial for the Null Results Special Issue of Journal of Business and Psychology. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 29, Issue. 2, p. 163.

Davidsson, Per 2015. Data replication and extension: A commentary. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Vol. 3, Issue. , p. 12.

Schwab, Andreas and Starbuck, William H. 2016. A Call for Openness in Research Reporting: How to Turn Covert Practices into Helpful Tools. SSRN Electronic Journal ,

Davidsson, Per and Gordon, Scott R. 2016. Much Ado about Nothing? The Surprising Persistence of Nascent Entrepreneurs through Macroeconomic Crisis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 40, Issue. 4, p. 915.

Davidsson, Per 2016. Researching Entrepreneurship. Vol. 33, Issue. , p. 247.

Kendall, Dana L and Campanario, Scott C 2016. Honoring God through scientific research: Navigating the ethics of publishing with our students. International Journal of Christianity & Education, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 133.

Byington, Eliza K. and Felps, Will 2017. Solutions to the Credibility Crisis in Management Science. Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 142.

McAbee, Samuel T. Landis, Ronald S. and Burke, Maura I. 2017. Inductive reasoning: The promise of big data. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 277.

Hauser, Oliver P. Linos, Elizabeth and Rogers, Todd 2017. Innovation with field experiments: Studying organizational behaviors in actual organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. , p. 185.

Harrison, Jeffrey S. Banks, George Christopher Pollack, Jeffrey M. O’Boyle, Ernest H. and Short, Jeremy 2017. Publication Bias in Strategic Management Research. Journal of Management, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 400.

Schwab, Andreas and Starbuck, William H. 2017. A Call for Openness in Research Reporting: How to Turn Covert Practices Into Helpful Tools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 125.

Woznyj, Haley M. Grenier, Kelcie Ross, Roxanne Banks, George C. and Rogelberg, Steven G. 2018. Results-blind review: a masked crusader for science. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 27, Issue. 5, p. 561.

Grand, James A. Rogelberg, Steven G. Banks, George C. Landis, Ronald S. and Tonidandel, Scott 2018. From Outcome to Process Focus: Fostering a More Robust Psychological Science Through Registered Reports and Results-Blind Reviewing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 13, Issue. 4, p. 448.

Taylor, Jamie and Collins, Dave 2019. Shoulda, Coulda, Didnae—Why Don’t High-Potential Players Make it?. The Sport Psychologist, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 85.

Brossoit, Rebecca M. Crain, Tori L. Hammer, Leslie B. Lee, Soomi Bodner, Todd E. and Buxton, Orfeu M. 2020. Associations among patient care workers' schedule control, sleep, job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Stress and Health, Vol. 36, Issue. 4, p. 442.

Huebner, Lena-Alyeska and Zacher, Hannes 2022. Effects of Action Planning After Employee Surveys. Journal of Personnel Psychology, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 23.

Bowling, Nathan A. Gibson, Anthony M. and DeSimone, Justin A. 2022. Stop With the Questions Already! Does Data Quality Suffer for Scales Positioned Near the End of a Lengthy Questionnaire?. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 37, Issue. 5, p. 1099.

Article contents

Our Scholarly Practices Are Derailing Our Progress: The Importance of “Nothing” in the Organizational Sciences

Abstract

Access options

References

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

Our Scholarly Practices Are Derailing Our Progress: The Importance of “Nothing” in the Organizational Sciences

Abstract

Access options

References

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests