Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T07:36:15.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical, Epidemiologic and Microbiologic Features of a Persistent Outbreak of Amikacin-Resistant Serratia marcescens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Julio C. Arroyo*
Affiliation:
Medical, Laboratory and Nursing Services, Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans' Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, the University of South Carolina Medical School, Columbia, South Carolina
W. Lloyd Milligan
Affiliation:
Medical, Laboratory and Nursing Services, Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans' Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, the University of South Carolina Medical School, Columbia, South Carolina
Bosko Postic
Affiliation:
Medical, Laboratory and Nursing Services, Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans' Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, the University of South Carolina Medical School, Columbia, South Carolina
Jimmie Northey
Affiliation:
Medical, Laboratory and Nursing Services, Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans' Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, the University of South Carolina Medical School, Columbia, South Carolina
Ellen Parker
Affiliation:
Medical, Laboratory and Nursing Services, Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans' Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, the University of South Carolina Medical School, Columbia, South Carolina
Charles S. Bryan
Affiliation:
Medical, Laboratory and Nursing Services, Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans' Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, the University of South Carolina Medical School, Columbia, South Carolina
*
Infectious Diseases Section, Medical Service, Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, S.C. 29201

Abstract

This article describes a prolonged outbreak (January 1977 to February 1980) of amikacin-resistant Serratia marcescens (ARSM) urinary infections and the methods used for its control. Significant factors predisposing to ARSM urinary tract infection included an extended hospital stay, being in the urology ward, and undergoing urologie surgery. There had been no prior administration of amikacin or of other aminoglycosides in 20 of 27 patients with ARSM urinary tract infections. Chronically infected patients who required multiple hospitalizations represented a major reservoir for the perpetuation of the outbreak, overshadowing the importance of aminoglycoside use. Traditional control measures and even a major change in the inanimate environment were only partially effective in controlling the outbreak, but treatment of bacteriuric patients in the urology unit with “second and third generation” cephalosporins interrupted patient-to-patient transmission. No new cases of ARSM bacteriuria appeared in the urology unit in the ensuing 12 months [Infect Control 1981; 2(5):367-372.]

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Betts, RF, Valenti, WM, Chapman, SW. Assessment of reliability of amikacin and lack of resistance development in a hospital situation. Presented at International Medical Symposium “Clinical Reliability of Amikacin.” Brussels, Belgium, Nov. 15, 1979.Google Scholar
2.Brown, A, Davis, L, Yee, RBet al.Endemic Serratia marcescens in the Veterans Administration Hospital in Pittsburgh, PA, 1971-1976. Health Lab Sci 1978; 15:159–67.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Jauregui, L, Cushing, RD, Lerner, AM. Gentamicin/amikacin resistant gram-negative bacilli at Detroit General Hospital, 1975-1976. Am J Med 1977; 15:159–67.Google Scholar
4.Craven, PC, Jorgensen, JH, Kasper, RLet al.Amikacin therapy of patients with multiply antibiotic resistant Serratia marcescens infections. Development of increasing resistance during therapy. Am J Med 1977; 62:902–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Meyer, RD. Patterns and mechanisms of emergence of resistance to amikacin. J Infect Dis 1977; 136:449–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Sklaver, AR, Greenman, RL, Hoffman, TA. Amikacin therapy of gram-negative bacteremia and meningitis. Treatment in disease due to multiple resistant bacilli. Arch Intern Med 1978; 138:713–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Moellering, RC, Wennemen, C, Kunz, LJet al.Resistance to gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin among clinical isolates of bacteria. Am J Med; 62:873–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bryan, CS, Parker, E, Schoenlein, PVet al.Plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance in a changing hospital environment: Efficacy of control measures. Am J Infect Control 1980; 8:6571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, First Ed. January 1976.Google Scholar
10.Tate, MW, Cleeland, RC (eds) Nonparametric and shortcut statistics in the social, biological and medical sciences. Danville, Illinois, Interstate Printers and Publishers, 1959:84–7.Google Scholar
11.Yu-, VL, Oakes, CA, Axnick, KJ, et al.Patient factors contributing to the emergence of gentamicin-resistant Serratia marcescens. Am J Med 1979; 66:468–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Casewell, MW, Phillips, I. Aspects of the plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance and epidemiology of Klebsiella species. Am J Med 1981; 70:459–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Holmes, RK, Minshew, BH, Gould, Ket al.Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to gentamicin andrelated aminoglycoside antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1974; 6:253–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Washington, JA, Yu, PHW, Gavan, TLet al.Interpretation of the disk diffusion susceptibility test for amikacin: Report of collaborative study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1979; 15:400–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed