Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T10:12:38.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interrepeat Fingerprinting of Third- Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Enterobacter cloacae Isolated During an Outbreak in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Paul E. Verweij*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Alex Van Belkum
Affiliation:
University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, and the Department of Bacteriology, University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Willem J.G. Melchers
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Andreas Voss
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Jacomina A.A. Hoogkamp-Korstanje
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Jacques F.G.M. Meis
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
*
Deparment of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Nijmegen, PO. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate an outbreak in neonates of Enterobacter cloacae infection resistant to third-generation cephalosporins.

Design:

A retrospective study of an outbreak in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and review of E cloacae isolates in pediatric wards and other intensive care units from June 1992 through March 1993.

Setting:

An academic tertiary care hospital.

Patients:

Six patients admitted to the NICU were colonized or infected with E cloacae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. In the period preceding the outbreak, four E cloacae isolates were available from four patients in the pediatric surgical ward. Nine isolates from four patients in two other intensive care units (ICUs) also were collected during the outbreak. Isolates were biotyped by the API 50CH system and genotyped by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting.

Results:

Typing by interrepeat PCR showed that 21 isolates, which were obtained from five neonates, were identical. One neonate was colonized with a different strain. Some neonates were colonized with a single type of E cloacae for a relatively long period of time. Isolates of patients who were cared for in the pediatric surgical ward and the two other intensive care units (ICUs) showed different genotypes. One patient in an ICU was colonized with an E cloacae strain genetically identical to the outbreak strain. No predominant biotype could be established.

Conclusions:

E cloacae can colonize neonates for a long period of time and although colonization with E cloacae initially may arise endogenously, we were able to show further transmission by cross-contamination in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Modi, N, Damjanovic, V, Cooke, RWI. Outbreak of cephalosporin resistant Enterobacter cloacae infection in a neonatal intensive care unit. Arch Dis Child 1987;62:148151.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, LA, Hieber, J. An outbreak of gentamicin-resistant Enterobucter cloacae infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. Infect Control 1983;4:148152.Google Scholar
3. Markowitz, SM, Smith, SM, Williams, DS. Retrospective analysis of plasmid patterns in a study of burn unit outbreaks of infection due to Enterobacter cloacae . J Infect Dis 1983;148:1823.Google Scholar
4. Gaston, MA. Enterobacter: an emerging nosocomial pathogen. J Hosp Infect 1988;11:197208.Google Scholar
5. Flynn, DM, Weinstein, RA, Nathan, C, Gaston, MA, Kabins, SA. Patients' endogenous flora as source of “nosocomial” Enterobacter in cardiac surgery. J Infect Dis 1987;156:363368.Google Scholar
6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Document M2-A4, vol 10, no 7. Villanova, PA NCCLS; 1990.Google Scholar
7. Versalovic, J, Koeuth, T; Lupski, JR. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:68236831.Google Scholar
8. Van Belkum, A. Genetic typing of medically important non-viral microorganisms by polymerase chain reaction-mediated DNA fingerprinting. Clin Microbial Rev 1994;7:174184.Google Scholar
9. Maniatis, T, Fritsch, EF, Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor laboratory; 1982.Google Scholar
10. Bingen, E, Denamur, E, Lambert-Zechovsky, N, Brahimi, N, El Lakany, M, Elion, J. Rapid genotyping shows the absence of cross-contamination in Enterobacter cloacae nosocomial infections. J Hosp Infect 1992;21:95101.Google Scholar
11. Wang, CC, Chu, ML, Ho, LJ, Hwang, RC. Analysis of plasmid patterns in paediatric intensive care unit outbreaks of nosocomial infection due to Enterobacter cloacae . J Hosp Infect 1991;19:3340.Google Scholar
12. Haertl, R, Bandlow, G. Epidemiological fingerprinting of Enterobacter cloacae by small-fragment restriction endonuclease analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of genomic restriction fragments. J Clin Microbial 1993;31:128133.Google Scholar
13. Lambert-Zechovsky, N, Bingen, E, Denamur, E, et al. Molecular analysis provides evidence for endogenous origin of bacteremia and meningitis to Enterobacter cloacae in an infant. Clin Infect Dis 1992;15:3032.Google Scholar
14. Falkiner, FR. Enterobacter in hospital. J Hosp Infect 1992;20:137140.Google Scholar
15. Burman, LG. Bergland, B, Huovinen, P, Tullus, K. Effect of ampicillin versus cefuroxime on the emergence of β -lactam resistance in faecal Enterobacter cloacae isolates from neonates. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993;31:111116.Google Scholar
16. Chow, JW, Fine, MJ, Shales, DM, et al. Enterobacter bacteremia: clinical features and emergence of antibiotic resistance during therapy. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:585590.Google Scholar
17. Sanders, CC. New β -lactams: new problems for the internist. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:650651.Google Scholar
18. Springer, C, Eyal, F, Michel, J. Pharmacology of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in newborn infants. J Pediatr 1982;100:647650.Google Scholar
19. Rhodes, KH, Henry, NK. Antibiotic therapy of severe infections in infants and children. Mayo Clin Proc 1992;67:5968.Google Scholar
20. Schaad, UB. Use of quinolones in pediatrics. Eur J Clin Microbial Infect Dis 1991;10:355360.Google Scholar
21. Aujard, Y, Bingen, E. Quinolones, from a compassionate to a rational use in children. Curr Opinion Pediatr 1992;4:291294.Google Scholar
22. Gaston, MA, Crees Morris, JA, Pitt, TL. Serotypes and biochemical profiles of British hospital strains of Enterobacter cloacae in relation to site of infection and antibiotic susceptibility. J Hosp Infect 1987;10:1727.Google Scholar
23. Poilane, I, Craud, P, Lachassine, E, et al. Enterobacter cloacae cross-colonization in neonates demonstrated by ribotyping. Eur J Clin Microbial Inject Dis 1993;12:820826.Google Scholar
24. Van Belkum, A, Melchers, W, de Pauw, B, Scherer, S, Quint, W, Meis, J. Genotypic characterization of sequential Candida albicans isolates from fluconazole-treated neutropenic patients. J Infect Dis 1994;169:10621070.Google Scholar
25. Van Belkum, A, Quint, WGV, de Pauw, BE, Melchers, WJG, Meis, JF. Typing of Aspergillus species and Aspergillus fumigatus isolates by interrepeat polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:25022505.Google Scholar
26. Verweij, PE, Geven, WB, Van Belkum, A, Meis, JF. Cross-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neonatal intensive care unit characterized by polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting. Pediatr Infect Dis 1993;12:10271029.Google Scholar