Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T09:26:30.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Priority of Patient Safety Associated With Robotic Surgical Instruments—Response to Landenberg et al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2017

Yuhei Saito*
Affiliation:
Surgical Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Hiroshi Yasuhara
Affiliation:
Surgical Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Satoshi Murakoshi
Affiliation:
Surgical Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Takami Komatsu
Affiliation:
Surgical Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Kazuhiko Fukatsu
Affiliation:
Surgical Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Yushi Uetera
Affiliation:
Surgical Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
*
Address correspondence to Yuhei Saito, MS, Surgical Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 113-8655 (saitoyu-ope@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp).

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letter in Reply
Copyright
© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Landenberg, N, Cole, AP, Gild, P, Trinh, QD. Challenging residual contamination of instruments for robotic surgery in Japan. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:501502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Saito, Y, Yasuhara, H, Murakoshi, S, Komatsu, T, Fukatsu, K, Uetera, Y. Challenging residual contamination of instruments for robotic surgery in Japan. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:143146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Wallace, BH, Wille, F, Roth, K, Hubert, H. Results of performance qualification testing on clinically-used da Vinci Endowrist instruments at hospitals in Germany. Central Service 2015;3:182187.Google Scholar
4. Wehrl, M, Michels, W. A method for testing the cleaning of MIS robotic instruments. Central Service 2013;3:202207.Google Scholar
5. Wehrl, M, Albers, G, Bühler, K, et al. Round robin tests conducted by the working group Da Vinci (AG DaVinci) to establish a method for testing the cleaning of MIS robotic instruments. Central Service 2014;3:173179.Google Scholar
6. Carter, A, Krüger, S, Schmidt, V, et al. Guideline compiled by the DGKH, DGSV and AKI for validation and routine monitoring of automated cleaning and disinfection processes for heat-resistant medical devices as well as advice on selecting washer-disinfectors. Central Service 2007;15:148.Google Scholar
7. Tollefson, MK, Frank, I, Gettman, MT. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy decreases the incidence and morbidity of surgical site infections. Urology 2011;78:827831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Southworth, PM. Infections and exposures: reported incidents associated with unsuccessful decontamination of reusable surgical instruments. J Hosp Infect 2014;88:127131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. MAUDE—Manufacturer and user facility device experience. US Food and Drug Administration website: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfMAUDE/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=5878988&pc=NAY. Published 2016. Accessed April 10, 2017.Google Scholar
10. Wendorf, KA, Kay, M, Baliga, C, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-associated AmpC Escherichia coli outbreak. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:634642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed