Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T21:10:45.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk Factors for Urinary Lithotripsy-Associated Sepsis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Robert Orenstein
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia
James E. Bross*
Affiliation:
Departments of Infectious Disease, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
Mary Dahlmann
Affiliation:
Hospital Epidemiology Section, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
*
Department of Infectious Disease, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17822

Abstract

Objectives:

To identify risk factors for sepsis following urinary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

Design:

Retrospective case-control study with two control groups.

Setting:

A rural, 570-bed, regional referral center.

Results:

Six cases (four bacteremias and two fungemias) were compared with two sets of 18 controls. Cases had a higher frequency and number of urinary tract infections prior to the procedure and tended to have larger stone size.

Conclusions:

Patients undergoing ESWL who are at high risk for infectious complications may be identified by preprocedure evaluation. Such patients may require alternative prophylactic regimens and close postprocedure follow-up.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Copcoat, MJ, Webb, DR, Kellet, MJ, et al. The complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: management and prevention. By J Urol 1986;58:578580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Lingeman, JE, Newman, D, Mertz, JH, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience. J Urol 1986;135:11341137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Roth, RA, Beckman, CE Complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Clin North Am 1988;15:155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Westh, H, Knudsen, E Hedengran, A, et al. ESWL of kidney stones does not induce transient bacteremia. A prospective study. J Urol 1990;144:1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cochran, JS, Robinson, SN, Crane, VS, Jones, DG. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-use of antibiotics to avoid postprocedural infection. Postgrad Med 1988;83:199204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Chat-ton, M, Vallancien, G, Prapotuich, D, Mombet, A, Brisset, M. Use of antibiotics in conjunction with extracorporeal lithotripsy. Eur Urol 1990;17:134138.Google Scholar
7. Claes, H, Vandeursen, R, Baert, L. Amoxycillin/clavulanate prophylaxis for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-a comparative study. J Antimicrob Chemother 1989;24SB:217220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Federmann, M, Kley, ILK. Miliary tuberculosis after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. N Engl J Med 1989;323:17:1212. Letter.Google Scholar
9. Kroneman, OC, Brodsky, MS, MacKenzie, J, Hauser, A. Endocarditis after lithotripsy. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:777. Letter.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Westh, H, Mogensen, P. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of a kidney stone complicated with Candida albicans septicemia and endophthalmitis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1990;24:81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Drach, GW, Dretler, S, Fair, W, et al. Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1986;135:11271133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. McCartney, AC, Clark, J, Lewi, HJ. Bacteriological study of renal calculi. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1985;4:553555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Dajani, AM, Shehabi, AA. The bacteriology and composition of infected stones. Urology 1983;21:351353.Google ScholarPubMed