Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T03:03:12.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validation of New Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

David Birnbaum
Affiliation:
Applied Epidemiology, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada
Samuel B. Sheps*
Affiliation:
Department of Healthcare and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia. Vancouver British Columbia, Canada
*
Department of Healthcare and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Extract

Tests may provide valuable information for identification or prediction functions. Examples include disease diagnosis and staging, therapeutic outcome prediction, outbreak detection, infection control policy compliance monitoring, and other quality assurance monitoring. However, the importance of information from specific tests depends on their validity and utility Thus, hospital epidemiologists who assess new or existing tests themselves should bear in mind “…a clear need for greater attention to accepted methodological standards on the part of researchers, reviewers and editors.”’ Poorly validated tests can produce harmful, misleading results.

Type
Statistics for Hospital Epidemiology
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sheps, SB, Schechter, MT. The assessment of diagnostic tests, a survey of current medical research. JAMA. 1984;252:24182422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Bailar, JC III, Mosteller, F, Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:266273.10.7326/0003-4819-108-2-266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Griner, PF. Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Ann Intern Med. 1981;94:553600.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Pauker, SG, Kassirer, JP. The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:11091117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Sackett, DL, Haynes, RB, Tugwell, I? Clinical Epidemiology, A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. Boston, Mass: Little Brown and Co; 1985.Google Scholar
6. Arkin, CF, Wachtel, MS. How many patients are necessary to assess test performance? JAMA. 1990;263:275278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Sackett, DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chron Dis. 1979;32:5163.10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Broderick, A, Mori, M, Nettleman, M, Streed, SA, Wenzel, RP. Nosocomial infections: validation of surveillance and computer modeling to identify patients at risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131:734742.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115558CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Last, JM. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1988.Google Scholar
10. Hunter, PR. Reproducibility and indices of discriminatory power of microbial typing methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:19031905.10.1128/jcm.28.9.1903-1905.1990CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Fleiss, JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1981.Google Scholar
12. Cleveland, WS. The Elements of Graphing Data. Monterey, Calif: Wadsworth Inc.; 1985.Google Scholar
13. Simchen, E, Wax, Y, Pevsner, B, et al. The Israeli study of surgical infections (ISSI): I. methods for developing a standardized surveillance system for a multicenter study of surgical infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988;9:232240.10.2307/30144175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Goodwin, LD. The use of power estimation in nursing research. Nursing Research. 1984;33:118120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Brown, GW, Hayden, GE. Nonparametric methods-clinical applications. Clinical Pediatrics. 1985;24:490498.10.1177/000992288502400905CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed