Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T18:01:16.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Abundance Correlations in Mercury-Manganese Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

K.C. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
M.M. Dworetsky
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Elemental abundances from recent spectrum-synthesis analyses of the ultraviolet spectra of normal and HgMn-type late-B stars are examined for inter-correlations and for correlations with stellar parameters by use of standard statistical techniques. A few marginally significant correlations are apparent in the normal-star sample. In the HgMn sample, significant correlations with Teff are identified for Mn, Cu, and Ga. Strong inter-correlations are also identified in this sample for the abundances of two triads of elements (Mg-Al-Cr and Mn-Cu-Ga). Trivariate correlation analysis is used to demonstrate that these element-element inter-correlations are statistically independent of both Teff and log g. The correlated behaviour of these characteristically anomalous elements casts new light on the apparent heterogeneity of the HgMn class of peculiar stars, and may have important implications for the diffusion model which has been advocated as an explanation of the HgMn phenomenon.

Type
I. General Properties of CP Stars
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1993

References

Abt, H.A., 1979. Astropbys. J., 230, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anders, E. & Grevesse, N., 1989. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, C.R., 1980. Publs astr. Soc. Pacif., 92, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworetsky, M.M. & Vaughan, A.H., 1973. Astropbys. J., 181, 911.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.A., 1970. Numerical Methods for Research Workers, Fourteenth Edition, Hafner Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, I.D. & Prinja, R.K., 1989. Astrophys. J. Suppl., 69, 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meader, A. & Meynet, G., 1988. Astr. Astrophys. Suppl., 76, 411.Google Scholar
Michaud, G., 1981. In: Upper Main Sequence Chemically Peculiar Stars, 23rd Liége Astrophys. Coll. p. 355, ed. Renson, P., Institut d’Astrophysique, Unversité de Liége.Google Scholar
Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. & Vetterling, W.T., 1986. Numerical Recipes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Preston, G.W., 1974. Ann. Rev. Astr. Astrophys., 12, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.C. & Dworetsky, M.M., 1990a. In: Evolution in Astrophysics: IVE Astronomy in the Era of New Space Missions, ed. Rolfe, E.J., ESA Publ., Noordwijk, p. 279. Google Scholar
Smith, K.C. & Dworetsky, M.M., 1990b. In: Evolution of Stars: The Photospheric Abundance Connection (Poster Papers) eds Michaud, G., Tutukov, A. & Bergevin, M., Université de Montreal, Montréal, p. 81.Google Scholar
Smith, K.C., 1992a. lecture Notes in Physics, 401, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.C., 1992b. PhD Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Wolff, S.C. & Wolff, R.J., 1974. Astrophys. J., 194, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, S.C. & Preston, G.W., 1978. Astrophys. J. Suppl., 37, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar