Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T17:20:04.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of mass loss on the formation of planetary nebulae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Sun Kwok*
Affiliation:
Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics N.R.C., Ottawa, Canada

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The idea that planetary nebulae (PN) originated from outer layers of red giants goes back to Shlovskii (1956). This hypothesis was supported by Abell and Goldreich (1966) who argued convincingly that red giants are the most likely progenitors of PN. Although this is generally accepted today, the details of the transition from red giants to PN remain in controversy. It was pointed out by Paczyński (1971 a) that PN progenitors must have similar luminosities to central stars of PN, and therefore are likely to be late-type supergiants undergoing double-shell burning. The advent of infrared astronomy led to the discovery that most, if not all, late-type giants and supergiants are losing mass at rates of 10-6 - 10-5 Mʘyr-1 (Gehrz and Woolf 1971). Such mass loss rates greatly exceed the nuclear burning rate (6 x 10-8 - 5 x 10-7 Mʘyr-1 for stars with core masses between 0.6 and 1.2 Mʘ) and must be the dominant factor in the late evolution of intermediate mass stars. The observation of white dwarfs in open clusters implies that up to 6 Mʘ can be lost during the red-giant phase (Romanishin and Angel 1980). Since the observed masses of PN are no more than a few tenths of a solar mass, the existence of massive circumstellar envelopes formed by steady mass loss must have an effect on the formation of PN.

Type
Session VI - Mass Loss and Stellar Evolution: Low Mass Stars
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1981

References

Abell, G.O. and Goldreich, P. 1966, Publ, Astron. Soc. Pacific, 78, 232 Google Scholar
Aller, L.H. and Czyzak, S.J. 1979, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc, 10, 666 Google Scholar
Alloin, D., Cruz-Gonzales, C. and Peimbert, M. 1976, Astrophys. J., 205, 74 Google Scholar
Barker, T. 1978, ibid, 221, 145 Google Scholar
Gehrz, R.P. and Woolf, N.J. 1971, ibid, 165, 285 Google Scholar
Kwok, S. 1981, in Physical Processes in Red Giants, ed. Renzini, A. and Iben, I., (Dordrecht: Reidel)., p. 421.Google Scholar
Kwok, S., Purton, CR. and FitzGerald, P.M. 1978, Astrophys. J. Letters, 219, L125 Google Scholar
Mathews, W.G. 1966, Astrophys. J., 143, 173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterbrook, D.E. 1974, Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae, (San Francisco, Freeman), p. 228 Google Scholar
Paczyński, B. 1971 a, Acta Astron., 31, 417 Google Scholar
Paczyńsi, B. 1971 b, Astrophys. Letters, 9, 33 Google Scholar
Pottasch, S.R. 1980, preprintGoogle Scholar
Romanishin, W. and Angel, J.R.P. 1980, Astrophys. J., 235, 992 Google Scholar
Shlovskii, I. 1956, Astron. Th., 33, 315 Google Scholar
Wood, P.R. 1979, Astrophys. J., 227, 220 Google Scholar
Zuckerman, B. 1980, in Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 17, in press Google Scholar