Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T10:58:42.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict: An Historic Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Anthi Helleni Poulos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , Spring 2000 , pp. 1 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the International Association of Law Libraries 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Message from the President of the United States Transmitting The Hague Convention and the Hague Protocol, January 6, 1999 (hereinafter “President's Message” or “Message”), 106th Congress 1st Session, Treaty Doc. 106–1.Google Scholar
2. This paper does not consider aspects of laws or practices (of international organizations or individual states) regarding cultural property outside the context of armed conflict, and discusses only those Conventions and cases which have a direct nexus to armed conflict, of an international or national nature. Likewise, collective security organizations such as the United Nations and the League of Nations are not examined by this paper except as pertinent to the subject of cultural property in armed conflict.Google Scholar
3. 249 United Nations Treaty Series 240 (1954).Google Scholar
4. Cultural property should be distinguished from “booty” in the sense of captured material and resources appropriate to conflict engagement. Cultural property may be, however, used synonymously with pillage, plunder, and spoils when the objects and sites involved are of a cultural nature.Google Scholar
5. Solf, Waldemar, Cultural Property, Protection in Armed Conflict, I Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 64 (1992).Google Scholar
6. For the legal analysis of Hague 54, please see below, Chapter III. Hague Convention of 1954, this paper.Google Scholar
7. See Chapter III this paper for discussion of Hague 54 provisions and interaction with other laws of war.Google Scholar
8. Bassiouni, M. Cherif, Reflections on Criminal Jurisdiction in International Protection of Cultural Property, 10 Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce 280, 285.Google Scholar
9. Id. at 287.Google Scholar
10. Xenophon [430-354 B.C.], Cyropaedia [The Young Cyrus] Book VII, The Great Battle, Line 73, Loeb Library at Vol. VI, Walter Miller, trans., The Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
11. 202-120 B.C.Google Scholar
12. Toman, Jiri, The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 4 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Id. Google Scholar
14. Merryman, John Henry and Eisen, Albert E., I Law Ethics and the Visual Arts, 2 (1987).Google Scholar
15. DuBoff, Leonard D. & Caplan, Sally Holt, The Deskbook of Art Law, Booklet D Art: The Victim of War, 3 (1996).Google Scholar
16. Guhl, E. & Koner, W., The Greeks and Romans, 586 (1989).Google Scholar
17. Wilhelm Treue, Art Plunder, 19, (Creighton, Basil, trans.) 1957.Google Scholar
18. The wanton destruction by the Vandals engendered the modern term “vandalize.”Google Scholar
19. Treue, supra note 17, at 20.Google Scholar
20. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 4.Google Scholar
21. Cooke, Jean et al., History's Timeline, 71 (1981) 202 (hereinafter “Timeline”).Google Scholar
22. DuBoff, , supra note 16, at 5.Google Scholar
23. DuBoff, , supra note 16, at 4.Google Scholar
24. Id. Google Scholar
25. Nafziger, James A. R., International Penal Aspects of Protecting Cultural Property,” 19 International Lawyer, 835.Google Scholar
26. Treue, supra note 18, at 38–39.Google Scholar
27. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 3.Google Scholar
28. Timeline, supra note 22, at 99–107.Google Scholar
29. The colonization of North America was conceived as permanent settlements by traders and religious refugees. The extent of the harm to indigenous populations in North America was not immediately evident but by the Civil War the legal status and level of ethno-cultural discrimination was evident. Measures to reverse and atone for those practices have only been undertaken by the U.S. Federal Government in recent history. However, this does not fall neatly within the concept of armed conflict in the sense of Hague 54, but interpretations of non-international armed conflict under Hague 54 would appear to apply to the extent that there was initial acquiescence by the indigenous population.Google Scholar
30. Timeline, supra note 22, at 99–107.Google Scholar
31. Timeline, supra note 22, at 130.Google Scholar
32. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 6.Google Scholar
33. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 9.Google Scholar
34. Bassiouni, supra note 9, at 288.Google Scholar
35. deVattel, E., 2 Le Droit des Gens [The Law of Mankind], 139-40 (1758), cited by Nahlik, Stanislaw E., International Law and the Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflicts, 27 Hastings Law Journal 1069, 1070 (1976).Google Scholar
36. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 6.Google Scholar
37. Timeline, supra note 22, at 152–153.Google Scholar
38. Timeline, supra note 22, at 224.Google Scholar
39. Case of the Vessel Marquis de Somereules, 1812 Stewart's Vice Admiralty Reports 482, cited in Bassouini, supra note 8, at 288.Google Scholar
40. Bassiouni, M. Cherif, supra note 8, at 288.Google Scholar
41. Id. Google Scholar
42. Timeline, supra note 22, at 99–107.Google Scholar
43. Cecil Gould, Trophy of Conquest, The Musee Napoleon and the Creation of the Louvre, 1965.Google Scholar
44. Quynn, Dorothy Mackay, The Art Confiscations of the Napoleonic Wars, 50 American Historical Review 437 (1945).Google Scholar
45. Merryman, , supra note 15, at 16.Google Scholar
46. Merryman, , supra note 15, at 15.Google Scholar
47. In this way, the perpetrator introduced an artifice of the law into a previously lawless practice and this would be the pattern of the future, greatest war against culture in history — World War II.Google Scholar
48. Merryman, supra note 15, at 17.Google Scholar
49. Id. Google Scholar
50. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 288.Google Scholar
51. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 6.Google Scholar
52. Merryman, supra note 15, at 18.Google Scholar
53. Merryman, supra note 15, at 17.Google Scholar
54. Merryman, supra note 15, at 18.Google Scholar
55. Id. Google Scholar
56. Timeline, supra note 22, at 224.Google Scholar
57. Apr. 24, 1863, cited in Bassiouni, supra note 9, at 289 and Merryman, supra note 15, at 14.Google Scholar
58. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 7.Google Scholar
59. France Objects to UNESCO Proposal for Joint Registration of Korean Assets, Korea Herald, 1 April 1999, 1.Google Scholar
60. Kwan-woo, Jun, Paris’ Alleged Omission of Seized Items from Retrieval List Stirs Controversy, The Korea Herald, 24 March 1999, 1.Google Scholar
61. SNU Calls for Unconditional Return of French-seized Assets, The Korea Herald, 30 March 1999, 1.Google Scholar
62. Declaration of the Conference of Brussels [not ratified], cited in Merryman, supra note 15, at 14.Google Scholar
63. Id. Google Scholar
64. Merryman, supra note 15, at 14.Google Scholar
65. 89 U.N.T.S. 93; 32 Stat. 1803; 1 Bevans at 247.Google Scholar
66. 36 Stat. 2277; TS 539; 1 Bevans 631.Google Scholar
67. Id. Google Scholar
68. Id. Google Scholar
69. Merryman, supra note 15, at 18. See also, Chapter III.A. The Convention, for a discussion of the exception for military necessity in Hague 54.Google Scholar
70. Nahlik, Stanislaw E., International Law and the Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflicts, 27 Hastings Law Journal 1069, 1074 (1976).Google Scholar
71. [1929] 1 King's Bench 718.Google Scholar
72. 82 Journal du droit Int. (Clunet) 119 (Civ. Trib. of Seine, July 12, 1954), cited in Merryman, supra note 15, at 28.Google Scholar
73. Merryman, supra note 15, at 28.Google Scholar
74. [1929] 1 King's Bench 718.Google Scholar
75. Decree 111, Council of People's Commissars, 1921 and Decree No., 245 All Russian Central Executive Committee, 1923; cited in Merryman, supra note 15, at 27.Google Scholar
76. [1929] 1 King's Bench 718, 725.Google Scholar
77. 420 F. Supp. 18 (1976).Google Scholar
78. 24 N.Y.2d 91 (1969).Google Scholar
79. Id. Google Scholar
80. Id. Google Scholar
81. Eirinberg, Keith W., The United States Reconsiders the 1954 Hague Convention, 3 International Journal of Cultural Property 27 (1994).Google Scholar
82. Eirinberg, supra note 82, at 27.Google Scholar
83. 15 American Journal of International Law Supplement 179-81 (1921) cited in Bassiouni, supra note 9, at 292.Google Scholar
84. Bassiouni, supra note 9, at 292.Google Scholar
85. Bassiouni, supra note 9, at 292, note 53.Google Scholar
86. Bassiouni, supra note 9, at 292.Google Scholar
87. 1933 Ann. Dig. 438 (In re G. Booty Case) 1924.Google Scholar
88. Id. Google Scholar
89. 46 Stat. 2343 (1929), 94 U.N.T.S. 57.Google Scholar
90. See Chapter U.C. below, this paper.Google Scholar
91. 49 Stat. 3267 (1935).Google Scholar
92. Nahlik, supra note 71, at 1075.Google Scholar
93. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 16.Google Scholar
94. Meyer, David A., The 1954 Hague Cultural Property Convention and Its Emergence into Customary International Law, 11 Boston University International Law Journal 349, 358 (1993).Google Scholar
95. Timeline, supra 22, at 202.Google Scholar
96. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 70.Google Scholar
97. Id. Google Scholar
98. 334 F. Supp. 111 (1971).Google Scholar
99. Id. at 115.Google Scholar
100. Roxan, David and Wastall, Ken, The Rape of Art, the Story of Hitler's Plunder of Europe, 1965. See also, Charles de Jaeger, The Linz File, Hitler's Plunder of Europe's Art, 1981.Google Scholar
101. Nahlik, , supra note 70, at 1076.Google Scholar
102. DuBoff, , supra note 16, at 17.Google Scholar
103. In December, 1941, the Reichminster (for the West) emptied 69,619 Jewish homes (38,000 in Paris). Later, plunder of the occupied countries was even more productive. “From the period of March 1941 to July 1944, the Special Staff for Pictorial Art brought into the Reich 29 large shipments including 137 freight cars with 4, 174 cases of art works.” 40 A.J.I.L. 172 (Judicial Decisions, Nuremberg), 238 (1947).Google Scholar
104. Merryman, supra note 15, at 23.Google Scholar
105. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 34.Google Scholar
106. Merryman, supra note 15, at 22.Google Scholar
107. Merryman, supra note 15, at 25.Google Scholar
108. No. 42255-84 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., filed Aug. 8, 1984).Google Scholar
109. Merryman, , supra note 15, at 25.Google Scholar
110. VIII Dept. State Bull. 21-22 (No. 185, January 9, 1943).Google Scholar
111. See Nuremberg, , Chapter II.C.1., this paper.Google Scholar
112. 678 F.2d 1150 (1982).Google Scholar
113. 678 F.2d 1140, 1153.Google Scholar
114. 536 F. Supp. 813 (1978), Federal Republic of Germany v. Elicofon.Google Scholar
115. 678 F. 2d 1150 (1982).Google Scholar
116. [1929] 1 King's Bench 718.Google Scholar
117. Merryman, supra note 15, at 23.Google Scholar
118. 41 American Journal of International Law 172, 237 (1947).Google Scholar
119. Chief of the Naval Staff (Staff Ia No. 1601/41 29. ix. 1941) cited in Merryman, supra note 15, at 21.Google Scholar
120. Id. Google Scholar
121. 40 American Journal of International Law 172 (Judicial Decisions, Nuremberg), 238 (1947).Google Scholar
122. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 68.Google Scholar
123. Breslau, Karen and Tucker, Elizabeth, The Heist of 1945, The Looted Treasures of Europe may at last be Returning to their Owners, Newsweek, 15 July 1991, 51.Google Scholar
124. Bird, Maryann, Looted And Disputed: Art From Europe's Dark Days, Time, 4 November 1996, 22.Google Scholar
125. Id. Google Scholar
126. 444 F. Supp. 1065 (1977), 569 F.2d 1109 (1977) (appealed).Google Scholar
127. Merryman, supra note 15, at 24.Google Scholar
128. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 67.Google Scholar
129. 444 F. Supp. 1065 (1977), 569 F.2d 1109 (1977).Google Scholar
130. 444 F. Supp. 1065, 1068 (1977).Google Scholar
131. 18 United States Code 2314, 2315.Google Scholar
132. Getier, Michael, Hungarian Leader See Better Ties With U.S. as Historic Crown is Returned, The Washington Post, 7 January 1978, A-10.Google Scholar
133. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 67.Google Scholar
134. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 66.Google Scholar
135. Timeline, supra note 22, at 195.Google Scholar
136. Chang, Iris, The Rape of Nanking, 215 (1998).Google Scholar
137. Id. Google Scholar
138. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 70.Google Scholar
139. Id. Google Scholar
140. Id. Google Scholar
141. James Saylor, Japanese-American Grievances Against the United States Government: Background and Summary of Proposed Legislation in the U.S. Senate to put into Effect the Findings of the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, Government Division, Library of Congress, 87-752 GOV, September 10, 1987, 1.Google Scholar
142. Id. Google Scholar
143. To Accept the Findings and to Implement the Recommendations of the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians on S. 1009, Before the Subcommittee on Federal Services, Post Office, and Civil Service, 100th Congress, S. Hrg. 100-260 (1987).Google Scholar
144. S. Hrg. 100-260, 453.Google Scholar
145. Id. Google Scholar
146. S. Hrg. 100-260, 453.Google Scholar
147. Saylor, supra note 143, at 7.Google Scholar
148. P.L. 100-383 (1988).Google Scholar
149. Timeline, supra note 22, at 212.Google Scholar
150. S. Rept. 97–298.Google Scholar
151. 3 Bevans 1207.Google Scholar
152. Id. Google Scholar
153. Military Government Regulations, United States 18-501.5.Google Scholar
154. Yalta Conference as quoted in S. Rept. 97-298.Google Scholar
155. P.L. 95–517.Google Scholar
156. Farmer, Walter I., Custody and Controversy at the Wiesbaden Collecting Point, 131, The Spoils of War (Simpson, Elizabeth, ed., 1997).Google Scholar
157. Id. at 133.Google Scholar
158. Statement of Ronald S. Lauder, Chairman, Commission for Art Recovery, World Jewish Congress, The Restitution of Art Objects Seized by the Nazis from Holocaust Victims, Hearings before the House Committee on Banking and Financial Services, 105th Cong. 1998.Google Scholar
159. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 68.Google Scholar
160. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 17.Google Scholar
161. Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis, [Charter of the International Military Tribunal - Nuremberg] Aug 18, 1945, 59 Stat. 1544 (1945), 82 United Nations Treaty Series 279.Google Scholar
162. Nuremberg Charter, supra note 153, at 1547.Google Scholar
163. 59 Stat. 1547.Google Scholar
164. Id. Google Scholar
165. Nahlik, supra note 71, at 1077.Google Scholar
166. Merryman, supra note 15, at 20.Google Scholar
167. Professor Lambert, Thomas F., Recalling the War Crimes Trials of World War II, 149 Military Law Review 15, 20 (1995).Google Scholar
168. Merryman, supra note 15, at 23 and Bassiouni, supra note 9, at 293.Google Scholar
169. Bassiouni, supra note 9, at 293.Google Scholar
170. Law No. 59, U.S. Military Government for Germany, November 10, 1947, cited in Bassiouni, supra at note 9, 293.Google Scholar
171. 6 United States Treaties & Other International Agreements 3516, 75 United Nations Treaty Series 287 (1956).Google Scholar
172. Bassiouni, supra note 9, at 296.Google Scholar
173. Bassiouni, supra note 9, at 294.Google Scholar
174. Id. Google Scholar
175. Nafziger, supra note 25, at 839.Google Scholar
176. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 75.Google Scholar
177. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 76.Google Scholar
178. Nahlik, Stanislaw E., International Law and the Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflict, 27 Hastings Law Journal 1069, 1077 (1976).Google Scholar
179. Meyer, supra note 95, at 352.Google Scholar
180. UNESCO, (last modified 14 January 1999) (hereinafter “Hague Ratifications”) http://www.unesco.org/general/clheritage/eng/legal/rat.html.Google Scholar
181. Nahlik, S. E., On Some Deficiencies of the Hague Convention of 1954 on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. 44 Annuaire d'AAA, 100 (1974) (hereinafter “Nahlik-Annuaire”).Google Scholar
182. 249 United Nations Treaty Series 240 (1954).Google Scholar
183. Id. Google Scholar
184. Duboff, supra note 16 at 76.Google Scholar
185. DuBoff, supra note 16, at 77.Google Scholar
186. UNESCO, Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 249 United Nations Treaty Series 215, http://www.unesco.org/general/eng/legal/clheritage/hague/index/html.Google Scholar
187. Nafziger, supra note 167, at 835.Google Scholar
188. Hague Convention Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, Oct. 18, 1907, 36 Stat, 2277, TS 539, 17 Bevan 631.Google Scholar
189. 249 United Nations Treaty Series 240 (1954).Google Scholar
190. Id. Google Scholar
191. Id. Google Scholar
192. See Chapter IA this paper.Google Scholar
193. 249 United Nations Treaty Series 240 (1954).Google Scholar
194. Hague Ratifications, supra note 172.Google Scholar
195. 249 United Nations Treaty Series 240 (1954).Google Scholar
196. Nahlik, , supra note 70, at 1079.Google Scholar
197. Nahlik, S. E., supra note 181, at 102.Google Scholar
198. 249 United Nations Treaty Series 240 (1954).Google Scholar
199. Nahlik, supra note 181, at 101.Google Scholar
200. Id. at 100.Google Scholar
201. Bassiouni, supra note 8, at 1024.Google Scholar
202. Meyer, supra note 95, at 360.Google Scholar
203. Meyer, supra note 95, at 357.Google Scholar
204. Bill Broadway, No Shelter for Yugoslav Shrines, Accounts Conflict on Damage to Sites Near NATO Targets, The Washington Post, 22 May 1999, B-8.Google Scholar