Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:12:40.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mesopotamia in British Strategy, 1903–1914

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Stuart Cohen
Stuart Cohen
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Britain's strategic interest in Mesopotamia in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was a consequence of her control over India. The valleys of the Tigris and the Euphrates constitute a natural highway from Syria to the Persian Gulf, and thence to the Indian Ocean. Not until a relatively late stage in Imperial history, however, did Britain extend her formal protection to this region. In the nineteenth century successive British governments had refused to finance the establishment of either a Mesopotamian steamer service or railway line. Subsequently, they had first (1903) rejected participation in an international Baghdad railway scheme, and then (1914) sanctioned complete German control over the project as far as Basra. A small Indian force was despatched to the head of the Persian Gulf in October 1914, but the subsequent Mesopotamian campaign was ‘a haphazard affair from start to finish’ lacking political or military direction. Thus, the De Bunsen committee, which reported on Britain's desiderata in Asiatic Turkey in June 1915, had concluded that Ottoman “devolutionary control” over Mesopotamia was preferable to Indian annexation of any part of the region other than the Basra vilayet; that October, the War Cabinet experienced difficulty in deciding whether to sanction an advance on Baghdad. No proclamation of political interest in Mesopotamia was in fact made by a British government until the capture of the city in 1917. The immediate and local arguments impelling that operation have been fully investigated. By contrast, the strategic tradition that deprecated it has been relatively neglected. This paper proposes to survey the latter and to indicate the degree to which the extension of the Mesopotamian campaign contradicted previous British strategy toward the region.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , May 1978 , pp. 171 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The standard accounts are, on the nineteenth century, Hoskins, H. L., British Routes to India (New York, 1928; 2nd ed., London, 1966);Google Scholar and on the Baghdad Railway, Chapman, M. K., Great Britain and the BaĢdad Railway 1888–1914 (Northampton, Mass., 1948).Google Scholar

2 Busch, B. C., Britain, India and the Arabs 1914–1921 (Berkeley, 1971), p. 53.Google Scholar On the campaign itself, Moberley, F. J., The Campaign in Mesopotamia, 1914–1918 (4 vols; London, 1923–1927).Google Scholar

3 Klieman, A. S., “Britain's War Aims in the Middle East in 1915”, Journal of Contemporary History, 3, 3 (11 1968), 225–236;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Rothwell, V. H., “Mesopotamia in British War Aims, 1914–1918”, Historical Journal, 13, 2 (06 1970), 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 9 May 1906 Foreign Office Paper 74b, Records of the Committee of Imperial Defence (Public Record Office, London), CAB 38/11/27; and minutes of 87th CID meeting, 11 May 1906, CAB 38/11/19.

5 Minutes of 110th CID meeting, 4 May 1911, CAB 38/18/29; and minutes of 115th meeting, 14 Dec. 1911, CAB 38/19/58.

6 June 1906 memorandum by Sykes, Mark, Foreign Office Records (PRO, London), FO 371/152/22155/22155; 17 January 1910.Google ScholarTyrrell, J. (Military Attaché, Istanbul) to Sir G. Lowther (Ambassador at Istanbul 1908–1913), no. 88Google Scholar; Istanbul Embassy Archives (PRO, London), FO 195/2346; 27 April 1906 General Staff Memorandum, War Office Records (PRO, London), WO 106/41, file C3/10; and 24 May 1911 Memorandum, WO 106/43, file 03/21.

7 28 May 1907 minute by Sir C. Hardinge (Permanent Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office, 1906–1910, Viceroy of India, 1910–1916), FO 371/350/16407/16407.

8 On the Oudh Bequest, the Indian Sepoy Guard, and the imposing Residency, see Lorimer, J. G., Gazetteer of the Persian Gulf, 'Oman, and Central Arabia, vol. 1, Historical, (Calcutta, 1908).Google Scholar

9 21 Aug. 1906 Sir N. O'Conor (Ambassador at Istanbul, 1898–1908) to Sir E. Grey (Foreign Secretary, 1905–1916), FO 371/154/29027/29027.

10 22 Aug. 1910 Lorimer, J. (Resident, Baghdad, 1910–1914)Google Scholar to Lowther, enclosed in FO 271/1000/930/3478. On the naqib's local power see Lorimer, , Gazetteer App. H., pp. 2368–2379.Google Scholar

11 10 March 1906 memorandum by A. Parker (FO clerk), FO 371/148/10401/10680; Fraser, Lovat, “Some Peoples of the Persian Gulf,” The Times, 9 01. 1908Google Scholar; 30 March 1908, evidence by Col. W. Yate before CID subcommittee, CAB 16/10 paras. 1089 and 1099–1101.

12 20 Oct. 1906 F. Maunsell (Military Attaché, Istanbul) Foreign Office, FO 371/155/36546/36546; 23 Feb. 1911 Lorimer and P. Cox (Resident, Persian Gulf, to Lowther, tel. FO 195/2367(i)). This was sent privately to Sir A. Nicolson (Permanent Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office, 1910–1916), minute, idem.

13 G. Lloyd, Report on the Trading Possibilities of Mesopotamia (1908), enclosed in 11 Jan. 1908 Board of Trade to India Office, India Office Records (Commonwealth Relations Office, London), L/P and S/3, vol. 259, no. 2832.

14 Cecil, Lady G., Life of Robert, Marquis of Salisbury, Vol. 2 (London, 1921), p. 130.Google Scholar

15 9 Sept. 1913 minute by 1st Marquess of Crewe (Secretary of State for India, 1910–1915), L/P and S/u, vol. 63, flO. 3724/13.

16 28 May 1908 Block (British representative on the Council of the Ottoman Public Debt) to Hardinge pte., FO 371/538.

17 18 June 1913 Honey (Vice-Consul, Mosul) to C. Marling (Chargé, Istanbul), FO 371/1805/14470/34001; and 23 June 1913 Lorimer-Lowther, FO 371/1817/20107/29184.

18 24 Nov. 1919 Hardinge-Nicolson pte., Nicolson MSS (PRO, London), FO 800/342, p. 237.

19 14 and 30 March 1915, memoranda by Sir A. Hirtzel (Secretary, Political Dept., India Office, 1909–1917), CAB 27/1, De Bunsen Committee papers, App. 6 and 7.

20 30 Oct. 1914 Sykes-Grey pte., Grey MSS (PRO, London), FO 800/III.

21 E.g., 11 April 1952 F. Cartwright (Ambassador at Vienna)–Nicolson pte., Nicolson MSS, FO 800/356, p. 127.

22 19 June 1913 memorandum by Sir L. Mallet (Asst. Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office, 1907–1913. Ambassador at Istanbul, 1913–1914), in Gooch, G. P. and Temperley, H., eds., British Documents on the Origins of the War, 1898–1914 (London, 1928–1938), vol. 10 (i), Appendix, pp. 901–902.Google Scholar

23 28 May 1913 Grey memorandum for the Cabinet, CAB 37/115/31.

24 Cunningham, A., “The Wrong Horse? A Study of Anglo-Turkish Relations before the First World War”, St. Antony's Papers (Oxford), 17 (1965), 73.Google Scholar

25 10 March 1914 Mallet-Grey pte., Grey MSS, FO 800/80, and 25 March 1914 Mallet-Nicolson pte. ‘The more we obtain concessions in each other's so-called spheres the easier it will be to arrest a division of Turkey’ (Nicolson MSS, FO 800/373, p. 201).

26 13 May 1914 FO-Admiralty, FO 371/2121/1067/20259, and 14 May 1914 Crewe minute, L/P and S/so, vol. 310 (ii), no. 1914/1771.

27 Mallet minute on 23 June Lorimer-Lowther, above, n. 17.

28 13 Sept. 1913 Government of India Office to India Office, in FO 371/2123/1940/12320.

29 25 June 1906 Grey memorandum, FO 371/152/22545/22545.

30 16 May 1906 Earl of Minto (Viceroy of India, 1905–1910), to J. Morley (Secretary of State for India, 1905–1910), pte., Morley MSS (CRO, London), vol. 8, p. 50.

31 24 Feb. 1913 Hardinge–Nicolson pte., Nicolson MSS, FO 800/364, p. 105.

32 13 Sept. 1913 IO–FO and minutes, FO 371/1825/25533/42105.

33 Nevakivi, J., “Lord Kitchener and the Partition of the Ottoman Empire 1915–1916”, Studies in International History: Essays Presented to Professor W. Norton Medlicott (London, 1967), pp. 316–329.Google Scholar

34 16 Sept. 1907 memorandum by A. Parker, FO 371/340/12/30891.

35 Black, C. E. D., “A Railway to India”, Nineteenth Century and After, 65 (1909), 163–169Google Scholar; C. E. D. Black-Sir W. Tyrrell (Grey's private secretary), FO 371/1246/9388/13011.

36 25 May 1909 Lowther-Grey 375 secret, FO, 371/340/12/30891.

37 17 Sept. 1907 minute by Grey, FO 371/340/12/30891.

38 27 July 1914 Parker-Mallet (draft), FO 371/2125/2390/33655, p. 21; see also Verete, M., “The Balfour Declaration and Its Makers”, Middle Eastern Studies, 6, 1 (01 1970), 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 24 July 1909, Report of the Mesopotamian Railways Conimittee, FO 371/764/2074/ 29701.

40 See, e.g., 20 July 1907 Admiralty memorandum 99d, CAB 38/13/26; and March 1911 Churchill memorandum, CAB 37/105/27.

41 15 Nov. 1904 War Office memorandum, Effect of the Bagdad Railway on Our Relations with Persia and the Defence of India, WO 106/52.

42 Hale, O. J., Publicity and Diplomacy, with Special Reference to Britain and Germany (New York, 1940), p. 262.Google Scholar

43 E.g., 8 March 1907 Grey-F. Lascelles (Ambassador at Berlin), Gooch, and Temper-ley, , British Documents, 6, (247), pp. 354–355.Google Scholar

44 3 Nov. 1907 Morley-Minto pte., Morley MSS, vol. 2, p. 299.

45 Taylor, A. J. P., The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918 (Oxford, 1957), p. 518.Google Scholar

46 Minutes of Nov. 1902 meeting, CAB 28/4/10 no. and Dilks, D., Curzon in India, vol. 1 (London, 1969), p. 148.Google Scholar

47 5 April 1914 Mallet-Nicolson pte., Nicolson MSS, FO 800/373, p. 210.

48 Greaves, R. L., “Some Aspects of the Anglo-Russian Convention and Its Workings in Persia, 1907–1914”, pt. 2, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 31 (1968), 308.Google Scholar

49 Parker minute on 18 June 1912 WO–FO, FO 37 5/5485/2064/26379; Hirtzel and Crewe minutes on 2 Feb. 1911 FO–IO, L/P and S/3, vol. 276, no. 1910/2961–2.

50 See Trumpener, U., Germany and the Ottoman Empire 1914–1918 (Princeton, 1968), p.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 24 Feb. 1911 Sir V. Chirol–Hardinge pte., Hardinge MSS (Cambridge University Library), vol. 92(i), no. 38, p. 60; The Times, 24 May 1912.

52 4 Aug. 1913 Lorimer–Marling, in FO 371/1485/42138/42138.

53 Busch, B. C., Britain and the Persian Gulf 1894–1914 (Berkeley, 1967), pp. 108–110, 255–257, 308–310, respectively.Google Scholar

54 19 June 1907 Nicolson–Hardinge pte., Nicolson MSS, FO 800/338, p. 155.

55 18 July 1912 Nicolson-Hardinge pte., Nicolson MSS, FO 800/357, p. 311, also 27 March 1911 minute by Eyre Crowe, Gooch and Temperley, British Documents 10 (ii), (23), p. 36.

56 28 August 1913 Parker–Stanley, FO 371/1792/6463/39776; for the agreements see Gooch and Temperley, British Documents, 10 (ii), (124), pp. 183–198; (133), pp. 203–206; (188), pp. 283–298; (249), pp. 397–408.

57 8 Jan. 1913, Hardinge–Crewe tel., Hardinge MSS, vol. 97 (ii), no. 15, p. 6.

58 1874, War Office memorandum, quoted in E. Elath, Britaniya u-Netiveha le-Hodu (Hebrew: ‘Britain's Routes to India’) (Jerusalem, 1971), pp. 178–179.

59 Parker minute on Maunsell's memorandum, above, note 12.

60 Note dated 24 Feb. 1915 by Sir M. Hankey (Secretary to the CID), CAB 38/12/60.

61 16 July 1906, War Office memorandum 84b, CAB 38/12/42.

62 24 July 5906 memorandum by Esher, CAB 38/13/45.

63 1 May 1911 War Office paper 104d, CAB 38/17/25.

64 11 July 1906 memorandum by Capt. Grant Duff, Military Policy in a War with Turkey, WO 106/42, file C3/21a; and 13 March 1912 minute by Capt. A. G. Stuart, Local Action in the Persian Gulf, 1911, WO 106/42, file C3/37.

65 30 April 1912 IO–FO, FO 371/1490/3369/18365.

66 21 Dec. 1903 Drury (C-in-C East Indies) to Admiralty, Admiralty Records (PRO, London), ADM 1/7964.

67 19 Nov. 1907 departmental minute, ADM 1/7985.

68 Enclosure in 30 March 1912 IO–FO, FO 371/1490/3369/18365.

69 13 March 1912 Stuart minute, above n. 64; and 3 April 1904 Admiralty memorandum 39d, CAB 38/4/25, p. 2.

70 27 April 1906 General Staff memorandum, WO 106/41, file C3/10; 29 June 1906 Morley–Minto pte., Morley MSS, vol. I, p. 140.

71 E.g. Maunsell's Military Report on Asiatic Turkey (1904), WO 33/325, p. 5; and evaluations, dated 1913, by Honey in FO 371/1805/14478/34001; and Lorimer in L/P and S/10, vol. 212, nos. 1913/2358 and 1913/3105.

72 The phrase in 27 June 1914 R. Bullard (Acting Vice-Consul, Basra, 1914) to Mallet FO 371/2135/29919/42808. For descriptions of attacks see FO 371/541, file 11395 (1908); FO 195/2308 (1909); FO 371/1785, file 45001 (1913); FO 371/2124, file 1990 (1914).

73 O'Conor minute on 17 April, 1907 F. Crow (Consul, Basra) to O'Conor, FO 195/2242.

74 22 Feb. 1909 J. Ramsay (Resident, Baghdad), to W. Young (Vice-Consul, Mosul), FO, 195/2308.

75 March 1914 Mallet–Grey pte., Grey MSS, FO 800/80; and 27 March 1914. Mallet–Grey tel. 194, FO 371/2123/1990/13605.

76 May 1906 minute by Capt. A. Grant Duff (DAQMG), WO 106/42, file C3/10.

77 24 April 1911 minute by H. Wilson, WO 106/43, file C3/21.

78 11 March 1909, Report of the CID Sub-committee on the Military Requirements of the Empire as Affected by the Defence of Egypt and the Soudan, CAB 16/4.

79 Minutes of 100th CID meeting, 4 May 1911, CAB 38/10/29.

80 6 March 1911 memorandum by the Foreign Office, FO 371/1245/8429/8429; 5 April 1911 Hirtzel-Sir R. T. Ritchie (Permanent Under-Secretary at the India Office, 1910–1912), L/P and S/10, vol. 162, no. 1911/3267a; and 8 June 1911 Government of India–India Office tel., L/P and S/10, Vol. 188, no. 1911/4523.

81 21 Dec. 1910 Adm–FO, FO 371/1015/36702/46211.

82 1 May 1911 War Office paper 104d, CAB 38/17/25.

83 Report of the McMahon Committee (15 Jan. 1912) and covering letter from the Government of India, in 30 April 1912 IO-FO, FO 371/1490/3369/18365.

84 27 June 1912 Government of India–War Office, WO 106/42, file C3/37.

85 12 Dec. 1910 Nicolson–Marling pte., Nicolson MSS, FO 800/344, p. 325; and 21 Aug. 1913 Crewe–Hardinge pte., Hardinge MSS, vol. 119 (i), no. 38, p. 65.

86 Rothwell, , “Mesopotamia in British War Aims”, pp. 286–292;Google Scholar “People forget how lately this asset began to dominate the region's economy and disturb its politics” (Monroe, E., Britain's Moment in the Middle East, 1914–1956 [London, 1963], p. 95).Google Scholar

87 10 June 1915 minute by Gen. Barrow (Military Secretary at the India Office 1914–1917), L/P and S/10, vol. 410 (i), no. 1914/2248. Also ra June 1914 minute by Holderness, ibid.; and 1 July 1914 Crewe minute, L/P and S/10, vol. 300(i), no. 1914/2351. In an unanswered despatch of 17 July 1914 Crewe asked Hardinge to confirm that an Indian expedition to defend the oil would not be contemplated (ibid.).

88 17 June 1914 Hardinge–Chirol pte., Hardinge MSS, vol. 93(ii), no. 173, p. 163.

89 29 April 1910 FO–WO, FO 371/1009/13041/13041.

90 21 May 1913 unsigned letter to Young, Young MSS (St. Antony's College, Oxford), file 1.