Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation

  • Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah (a1) and Ian Robinson (a1)
Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the benefits of and barriers to user involvement in medical device technology development and evaluation.

Methods: A structured review of published literature in peer-reviewed journals was conducted.

Results: This literature review revealed that the main benefits of user involvement were an increased access to user needs, experiences, and ideas; improvements in medical device designs and user interfaces; and an increase in the functionality, usability, and quality of the devices. On the other hand, resource issues, particularly those of time and money were found the key impediments to involving users in the development and evaluation of medical device technologies. This study also has categorized both the benefits of and barriers to user involvement.

Conclusions: The involvement of users in medical device technology development and evaluation requires resources, which are limited; however, this involvement is essential from both users and manufacturers perspectives.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bairstow PJ, Mendelson R, Dhillon R, Valton F. 2006 Diagnostic imaging pathways: Development, dissemination, implementation, and evaluation. Int J Qual Health Care. 18: 5157.
Batavia AI, Hammer GS. 1990 Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. J Rehabil Res Dev. 27: 425436.
Bobrowski PE, Wilemon D. Restructuring to achieve integration in the medical technology development process. In: Proceedings of managing in a global environment - IEEE International Engineering Management Conference. Eatontown, NJ: October 25–28, 1992: 6770.
Bray DD. 2000 Creative collaboration: User-centered design in practice. MD&DI. March: 7689.
Brockhoff K. 2003 Customers' perspectives of involvement in new product development. Int J Technol Manage. 26: 464481.
Brooks NA. 1991 User's responses to assistive devices for physical disability. Soc Sci Med. 32: 14171424.
Buckley KM, Tran BQ, Prandoni CM, Clark HM. 2002 Training future providers in home care and telehealth technologies: A collaborative effort between nursing and biomedical engineering. Home Health Care Manag Pract. 14: 362371.
Buhler C. 1996 Approach to the analysis of user requirements in assistive technology. Int J Ind Ergon. 17: 187192.
Buhler C, Hoelper R, Hoyer H, Humann W. 1995 Autonomous robot technology for advanced wheelchair and robotic aids for people with disabilities. Rob Auton Syst. 14: 213222.
Campbell AJ, Cooper RG. 1999 Do customer partnerships improve new product success rates? Ind Market Manag. 28: 507519.
Conway HA, McGuinness NW. 1986 Idea generation in technology-based firms. J Prod Innov Manage. 3: 276291.
Conway S. 1993. The role of users in the innovation process. Doctoral Working Paper Series, No 10 (NS). Aston Business School, Birmingham, UK;
Craig J, Russell C, Patterson V, Wootton R. 1999 User satisfaction with realtime teleneurology. J Telemed Telecare. 5: 237241.
Craven MP, Martin JL. 2004. How does the healthcare industry involve users in medical device development?—Pointers for UbiHealth. Paper presented at UbiHealth 2004: The 3rd International Workshop on Ubiquitous Computing for Pervasive Healthcare Applications. Nottingham, England: September 67
De P, Ferratt TW. 1998 An information system involving competing organizations. Commun ACM. 41: 9098.
De P, Ferratt TW. An interorganizational information system in the health care arena: Insights gained from a hierarchical analysis. In: Agarwal R, ed. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research. Boston, MA: March 26–28, 1998: 214223.
Deslandres V, Pierreval H. 1997 Knowledge acquisition issues in the design of decision support systems in quality control. Eur J Oper Res. 103: 296311.
Franz CR, Robey D. 1984 An investigation of user-led system design: Rational and political perspectives. Commun ACM. 27: 12021209.
Fundin AP, Bergman BLS. 2003 Exploring the customer feedback process. Measur Bus Excell. 7: 5565.
Gales L, Mansour-Cole D. 1995 User involvement in innovation projects: Toward an information processing model. J Eng Technol Manage. 12: 77109.
Gallivan MJ, Keil M. 2003 The user-developer communication process: A critical case study. Inf Syst J. 13: 3768.
Garmer K, Liljegren E, Osvalder A-L, Dahlman S. 2002 Application of usability testing to the development of medical equipment. Usability testing of a frequently used infusion pump and a new user interface for an infusion pump developed with a human factors approach. Int J Ind Ergon. 29: 145159.
Garmer K, Liljegren E, Osvalder A-L, Dahlman S. 2002 Arguing for the need of triangulation and iteration when designing medical equipment. J Clin Monit Comput. 17: 105114.
Garmer K, Ylven J, MariAnne Karlsson IC. 2004 User participation in requirements elicitation comparing focus group interviews and usability tests for eliciting usability requirements for medical equipment: A case study. Int J Ind Ergon. 33: 8598.
Gemunden HG, Ritter T, Heydebreck P. 1996 Network configuration and innovation success: An empirical analysis in German high-tech industries. Int J Res Mark. 13: 449462.
Glen JMW, Lord M. 1996 New product development processes within the UK medical device industry. Med Eng Phys. 18: 670676.
Government of USA. Assistive Technology Act of 1998. Public Law 105–394. Vol. 112 STAT.; Nov. 13, 1998: 36273662.
Gronbaek K, Kyng M, Mogensen P. 1993 CSCW challenges: Cooperative design in engineering projects. Commun ACM. 36: 6777.
Gruner KE, Homburg C. 2000 Does customer interaction enhance new product success? J Bus Res. 49: 114.
Habermeier KF. 1990 Product use and product improvement. Res Policy. 19: 271283.
Handels H, Rinast E, Busch C, et al. 1997 Image transfer and computer-supported cooperative diagnosis. J Telemed Telecare. 3: 103107.
Hasu M. 2000 Constructing clinical use: An activity-theoretical perspective to implementing new technology. Technol Anal Strateg Manage. 12: 369382.
Hasu M, Engestrom Y. 2000 Measurement in action: An activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 53: 6189.
Herstatt C, von Hippel E. 1992 From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a “low-tech” field. J Prod Innov Manage. 9: 213221.
Hummel M, van Rossum W, Omta O, et al. 2001 Types and timing of inter-organizational communication in new product development. Creativ Innov Manage. 10: 225233.
Hummel MJM, Rossum Wv, Verkerke GJ, Rakhorst G. 2002 Product design planning with the analytic hierarchy process in inter-organizational networks. R&D Manage. 32: 451458.
Kauppinen M, Kujala S, Aaltio T, Lehtola L. Introducing requirements engineering: How to make a cultural change happen in practice. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering. September 9–13, 2002: 4351.
Kittel A, Marco AD, Stewart H. 2002 Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 24: 106114.
Kristensson P, Gustafsson A, Archer T. 2004 Harnessing the creative potential among users. J Prod Innov Manage. 21: 414.
Kristensson P, Magnusson PR, Matthing J. 2002 Users as a hidden resource for creativity: Finding from an experimental study on user involvement. Creativ Innov Manag. 11: 5561.
Kyng M. 1991 Designing for cooperation: Cooperating in design. Commun ACM. 34: 6573.
LaBahn DW, Ali A, Krapfel R. 1996 New product development cycle time: The influence of project and process factors in small manufacturing companies. J Bus Res. 36: 179188.
Lacey G, Slevin F. Putting the user at the centre of the design process. In: Abstracts of the proceedings of International Conference on Technology and Aging. Toronto, ON, Canada: Sept. 12–14, 2001: 65.
Lasky FD, Boser RB. 1997 Designing in quality through design control: A manufacturer's perspective. Clin Chem. 43: 866872.
Lettl C, Gemunden HG. 2005 The entrepreneurial role of innovative users. J Bus Ind Market. 20: 339346.
Lichter H, Schneider-Hufschmidt M, Zullighoven H. 1994 Prototyping in industrial software projects-bridging the gap between theory and practice. IEEE Trans Software Eng. 20: 825832.
Lilien GL, Morrison PD, Searls K, et al. 2002 Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Manage Sci. 48: 10421059.
Liljegren E, Osvalder A-L. 2004 Cognitive engineering methods as usability evaluation tools for medical equipment. Int J Ind Ergon. 34: 4962.
Lin L, Isla R, Doniz K, et al. 1998 Applying human factors to the design of medical equipment: Patient-controlled analgesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 14: 253263.
Lin L, Vicente KJ, Doyle DJ. 2001 Patient safety, potential adverse drug events, and medical device design: A human factors engineering approach. J Biomed Inform. 34: 274284.
Luck R. 2003 Dialogue in participatory design. Design Stud. 24: 523535.
Luthje C. 2003. Customers as co-inventors: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of customer-driven innovations in the field of medical equipment. Paper presented at 32nd European Marketing Academy Conference (EMAC). Glasgow, UK: May 20–23
Marshall R, Case K, Oliver R, et al. 2002 A task based ‘design for all’ support tool. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 18: 297303.
McLaughlin J, Skinner D. 2000 Developing usability and utility: A comparative study of the user of new IT. Technol Anal Strateg Manage. 12: 413423.
Miettinen R, Hasu M. 2002 Articulating user needs in collaborative design: Towards an activity-theoretical approach. Comput Support Coop Work. 11: 129151.
Morrison PD, Roberts JH, Midgley DF. 2004 The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status. Res Policy. 33: 351362.
Mulholland SJ, Packer TL, Laschinger SJ, et al. 2000 Evaluating a new mobility device: Feedback from women with disabilities in India. Disabil Rehabil. 22: 111122.
Neale MR, Corkindale DR. 1998 Co-developing products: Involving customers earlier and more deeply. Long Range Plann. 31: 418425.
Nijssen EJ, Biemans WG, de Kort JF. 2002 Involving purchasing in new product development. R&D Manage. 32: 281289.
Noyes JM, Starr AF. Working with users in system development: Some methodological considerations. Integrating HCI in the Lifecycle, IEE Colloquium on. April 11, 1995: 7/17/3.
Obradovich JH, Woods DD. 1996 Users as designers: How people cope with poor HCI design in computer-based medical devices. Hum Factors. 38: 574592.
Ogawa S. 1998 Does sticky information affect the locus of innovation? Evidence from the Japanese convenience-store industry. Res Policy. 26: 777790.
Olson EL, Bakke G. 2001 Implementing the lead user method in a high technology firm: A longitudinal study of intentions versus actions. J Prod Innov Manage. 18: 388395.
Ornetzeder M. Assessing technology from the users' perspective. Possibilities and limitations of focus group discussions illustrated by ecological housing construction. In: Proceedings of Technological Studies: User Involvement in Technological Innovation, International Summer Academy. Deutschlandsberg, Austria: July 8–13, 2001: 155166.
Ornetzeder M, Rohracher H. 2006 User-led innovations and participation processes: Lessons from sustainable energy technologies. Energ Policy. 34: 138150.
Powers DM, Greenberg N. 1999 Development and use of analytical quality specifications in the in vitro diagnostics medical device industry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 59: 539543.
Rauterberg M, Strohm O, Kirsch C. 1995 Benefits of user-oriented software development based on an iterative cyclic process model for simultaneous engineering. Int J Ind Ergon. 16: 391409.
Ritter T, Walter A. 2003 Relationship-specific antecedents of customer involvement in new product development. Int J Technol Manage. 26: 482501.
Rohracher H. 2003 The role of users in the social shaping of environmental technologies. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res. 16: 177192.
Samuelsson K, Larsson H, Thyberg M, Gerdle B. 2001 Wheelchair seating intervention. Results from client-centered approach. Disabil Rehabil. 23: 677682.
Shah SGS, Robinson I. 2006 User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: Structured literature review. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 19: 500515.
Shaw B. 1985 The role of the interaction between the user and the manufacturer in medical equipment industry. R&D Manage. 15: 283292.
Shaw B. 1998 Innovation and new product development in the UK medical equipment industry. Int J Technol Manage. 15: 433445.
Stickle MS, Ryan S, Rigby PJ, Jutai JW. 2002 Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: Evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disabil Rehabil. 24: 115125.
Tsai W-T, Mojdehbakhsh R, Rayadurgam S. Experience in capturing requirements for safety-critical medical devices in an industrial environment. In: Proceedings of 2nd IEEE High-Assurance Systems Engineering Workshop. Washington, DC: August 11–12, 1997: 3236.
Urban GL, von Hippel E. 1988 Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Manage Sci. 34: 569582.
von Hippel E. 1986 Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Manage Sci. 32: 791805.
von Hippel E, Thomke S, Sonnack M. Creating breakthroughs at 3M8. Harv Bus Rev. 1999: 4757.
Voss CA. 1985 The role of users in the development of applications software. J Prod Innov Manage. 2: 113121.
Woodside AG, Breaux R, Briguglio E. 1998 Testing care-giver acceptance of new syringe technologies. Int J Technol Manage. 15: 446457.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2003. Medical device regulations: Global overview and guiding principles. Geneva: WHO;
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed