Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:03:17.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Canadian Physiotherapy Quality of Care Project: Analysis of a Derailed Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Carole Miles-tapping  and
G. A. (sandy) Rennie
Carole Miles-tapping
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
G. A. (sandy) Rennie
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Physiotherapy Quality of Care Project was a project of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association, sponsored by the Canadian government to ensure the quality of physiotherapy. A consensus committee of physiotherapy educators and managers developed and tested an instrument to measure changes in patients' functional status during physiotherapy. Despite scientific development and wide distribution, this technology was not adopted. Alternative methods, which were heavily marketed, gained nationwide use instead.

Type
Special Section: Assessing The Technology Of Physical Therapy
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Winter 1992 , pp. 35 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Brook, R. H., et al. Assessing the quality of medical care using outcome measures. Medical Care, 1975, 15(suppl), 1–15.Google Scholar
2.Brook, R. H., Williams, K. N., & Davies-Avery, A.Quality assurance today and tomorrow: Forecast for the future. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1976, 6, 809–16.Google Scholar
3.Bruett, T. L., & Overs, R. P.A critical review of 12 ADL scales. Physical Therapy, 1969, 49, 857–62.Google Scholar
4.Campbell, M. C.Information systems and management of hospital nursing. Ph.D. thesis. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto, 1984.Google Scholar
5.Chambers, L. W., Sackett, D. L., Goldsmith, C. H., et al. Development and application of an index of social function. Health Service Research, 1976, 11, 430–41.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Chambers, L. W., Sackett, D. L., MacPherson, A. S., et al. The development and application of indexes of health: Methodologic documentation and report of the first generation of investigations. Saint John's, Newfoundland: Memorial University, 1976.Google Scholar
7.De Geyndt, W. Five approaches for assessing the quality of care. Hospital Administration, 1970 (Winter).Google Scholar
8.Donabedian, A.Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1966, 44(suppl.), 166–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Health and Welfare Canada, Canadian Physiotherapy Association. Toward assessment of quality of care in physiotherapy. Ottawa: Health Services Directorate, Health Services and Promotion Branch, 1979.Google Scholar
10.Health and Welfare Canada, Canadian Physiotherapy Association. Toward assessment of quality of care in physiotherapy, vol. 2: Instruments to measure health status of patients receiving physiotherapy. Ottawa: Health Services Directorate, Health Services and Promotion Branch, 1981.Google Scholar
11.Health and Welfare Canada, Statistics Canada. Physiotherapy workload measurement system. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, 1988 (Catalogue H30-11/3-15E).Google Scholar
12.Huskisson, E. C.Measurement of pain. Lancet, 1974, 2, 1127–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Jette, A. M.Functional status index: Reliability of a chronic disease evaluation instrument. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1980, 61, 395–401.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Keppel, G.Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
15.Lindsay, M. I. Jr., et al. Quality of care assessment II: Outpatient medical care following hospital dismissal after myocardial infarction. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 1977, 52, 220–27.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W.Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 1965, 14, 61–65.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Mitchell, J. B.Patient outcomes in an alternative long-term care setting. Medical Care, 1978, 16, 439–52.Google Scholar
18.Patrick, D. L., Bush, J. W., & Chen, M. M.Toward operational definition of health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1973, 14, 6–23.Google Scholar
19.Reynolds, W. J., Rushing, W. A., & Miles, D. L.The validation of a function status index. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1974, 15, 271.Google Scholar
20.Sister Kenny Institute. Revised Kenny self care evaluation manual. Minneapolis, MN: Department of Audiovisual Services, Sister Kenny Institute, 1978.Google Scholar
21.Statistics Canada. Canadian schedule of unit values for physiotherapy, rev. ed. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 1977.Google Scholar
22.Stewart, A. L., Ware, J. E., Brook, R. H., & Davies-Avery, A.Conceptualization and measurement of health in adults in the health insurance study, vol. II: Physical health in terms of functioning. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, R-1987/2-HEW, 1978.Google Scholar
23.Wylie, C. M.Measuring end results of rehabilitation of patients with stroke. Public Health Reports, 1967, 82, 893–98.Google Scholar