Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T08:28:49.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consensus Development: An Historical Note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Seymour Perry
Seymour Perry
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Medical Center
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has always carefully limited its responsibilities to biomedical research and knowledge development, including clinical trials, dissemination of results of research, and training. Ten years ago, NIH undertook to examine its possible role in the evaluation of medical technologies.

In 1976, the U.S. Congress became alarmed over the increase in health care costs: in particular, that a number of expensive technologies, such as coronary artery bypass surgery and electronic fetal monitoring, had entered the delivery system without adequate study of their safety, efficacy, cost, or other implications. At the time, there was no formal structure or forum in either the executive branch of the government or in the private sector for seeking a consensus that a medical innovation was actually safe, beneficial, and ready to be transferred into the health care delivery system. Similarly, there was no structured process through which the parties who comprise the delivery system could meet with representatives of the research community to examine the medical-scientific issues surrounding a given innovation along with cost and cost- effectiveness, ethics, and other societal issues of importance to the system.

Type
Editorial
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 481 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

References

REFERENCES

1. Javits, J. K. United States Senate, letter to Dr. Donald Fredrickson, 03 23, 1976.Google Scholar
2. Kennedy, E.Where should the money go? The Sciences, 1976, 16, 10–11, 27.Google Scholar
3. McCarthy, E. J., & Kilpatrick, J. J. A political bestiary. Washington Star, 09 29, 1980, p. 24.Google Scholar
4. National Institutes of Health. The responsibilities of the NIH at the health research/health care interface. Bethesda, MD: Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, 1977.Google Scholar
5. Simmons, W. W. The Consensor. The Futurist, 1979 (04), 91–4.Google Scholar
6. Twain, M.On the damned human race. American Century Series, 1862.Google Scholar