Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T05:39:15.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors influencing the publication of health research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2004

Eugenia Cronin  and
Trevor Sheldon
Eugenia Cronin
Affiliation:
South East London Strategic Health Authority
Trevor Sheldon
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Assess the degree to which research project findings were published and explore factors that influenced publication.

Methods: Questionnaire to project leaders. Classification of publications and findings. Chi-squared; univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

Results: Forty percent of projects published in peer-reviewed journal; highly statistically significant relationships between publication in peer-reviewed journals and (1) projects in Responsive/Fellowships streams (p=.045); and (2) projects awarded >£22,713 (p=.02); influence of study findings not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Funders should consider the significant number of studies that did not result in publication and the higher rate of publication in peer-reviewed journals from some programs.

Keywords

Publication biasMeta-analysisPublic policy
Type
RESEARCH REPORTS
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , August 2004 , pp. 351 - 355
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Smith H. 1987 Publication bias and clinical trials. ControlClin Trials. 8: 343– 353.Google Scholar
Dickersin K, Min YL, Meinert CL. 1992 Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA. 267: 374– 378.Google Scholar
Peckham M. 1993 Research for health. London: Department of Health;
Song F, Eastwood AJ, Gilbody S, Duley L, Sutton AJ. 2000 Publication and related biases. Health Technol Assess. 4: No. 10.Google Scholar