Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Matchar, David B. Bilger, Marcel Do, Young K. and Eom, Kirsten 2015. International Comparison of Poststroke Resource Use: A Longitudinal Analysis in Europe. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 24, Issue. 10, p. 2256.

    Ward, Anthony B. Chen, Christopher Norrving, Bo Gillard, Patrick Walker, Marion F. Blackburn, Steven Holloway, Laura Brainin, Michael and Philp, Ian 2014. Evaluation of the Post Stroke Checklist: a pilot study in the United Kingdom and Singapore. International Journal of Stroke, Vol. 9, p. 76.

    Freburger, Janet K. Holmes, George M. Ku, Li-Jung E. Cutchin, Malcolm P. Heatwole-Shank, Kendra and Edwards, Lloyd J. 2011. Disparities in Postacute Rehabilitation Care for Stroke: An Analysis of the State Inpatient Databases. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 92, Issue. 8, p. 1220.

    Reinhold, Thomas Brüggenjürgen, Bernd Schlander, Michael Rosenfeld, Stephanie Hessel, Franz and Willich, Stefan N. 2010. Economic analysis based on multinational studies: methods for adapting findings to national contexts. Journal of Public Health, Vol. 18, Issue. 4, p. 327.

    Svendsen, Marie Louise Ehlers, Lars Holger Andersen, Grethe and Johnsen, Søren Paaske 2009. Quality of Care and Length of Hospital Stay Among Patients With Stroke. Medical Care, Vol. 47, Issue. 5, p. 575.

    Woo, Jean Chan, Shiu Yu Sum, Mi Wan Cecilia Wong, Eric and Chui, Yeuk Ping Maria 2008. In patient stroke rehabilitation efficiency: Influence of organization of service delivery and staff numbers. BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 1,

    Ditunno, P L Patrick, M Stineman, M Morganti, B Townson, A F and Ditunno, J F 2006. Cross-cultural differences in preference for recovery of mobility among spinal cord injury rehabilitation professionals. Spinal Cord, Vol. 44, Issue. 9, p. 567.

    Putman, Koen de Wit, Liesbet Schupp, Wilfried Ilse, Baert Berman, Peter Connell, Louise Dejaeger, Eddy de Meyer, Anne-Marie de Weerdt, Willy Feys, Hilde Walter, Jenni Lincoln, Nadina Louckx, Fred Anneleen, Martens Birgit, Schuback Smith, Bozena and Leys, Mark 2006. Use of time by physiotherapists and occupational therapists in a stroke rehabilitation unit: A comparison between four European rehabilitation centres. Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 28, Issue. 22, p. 1417.

  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 19, Issue 2
  • April 2003, pp. 267-277

HEALTH CARE RESOURCE USE AND STROKE OUTCOME: Multinational Comparisons within the GAIN International trial

  • Kjell Asplund (a1), Sharron Ashburner (a2), Kathy Cargill (a2), Margaret Hux (a3), Ken Lees (a4) and Michael Drummond for the GAIN International Investigators (a5)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2003

Background and Purpose: Outcome in patients hospitalized for acute stroke varies considerably between populations. Within the framework of the GAIN International trial, a large multicenter trial of a neuroprotective agent (gavestinel, glycine antagonist), stroke outcome in relation to health care resource use has been compared in a large number of countries, allowing for differences in case mix.

Methods: This substudy includes 1,422 patients in 19 countries grouped into 10 regions. Data on prognostic variables on admission to hospital, resource use, and outcome were analyzed by regression models.

Results: All results were adjusted for differences in prognostic factors on admission (NIH Stroke Scale, age, comorbidity). There were threefold variations in the average number of days in hospital/institutional care (from 20 to 60 days). The proportion of patients who met with professional rehabilitation staff also varied greatly. Three-month case fatality ranged from 11% to 28%, and mean Barthel ADL score at three months varied between 64 and 73. There was no relationship between health care resource use and outcome in terms of survival and ADL function at three months. The proportion of patients living at home at three months did not show any relationship to ADL function across countries.

Conclusions: There are wide variations in health care resource use between countries, unexplained by differences in case mix. Across countries, there is no obvious relationship between resource use and clinical outcome after stroke. Differences in health care traditions (treatment pathways) and social context seem to be major determinants of resource use. In making comparisons between countries, great care should be exercised in using outcome variables as indicators of quality of stroke care.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *