Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T01:57:44.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Progress on Firms Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2009

Duncan Neuhauser
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University

Abstract

Firms research combines parallel providers of care, ongoing patient randomization, and continuous experimental changes and improvement. This form of efficient research now has a substantial track record of published studies by a growing number of hospitals.

Type
General Essays
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Cargill, V., Cohen, D., Kroenke, K., & Neuhauser, D.Ongoing randomization: An innovation in medical care research. Health Service Research, 1986, 21, 663–78.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Cargill, V., Conti, M., Neuhauser, D., & McClish, D.Improving the effectiveness of screening colorectal cancer by involving nurse clinicians. Medical Care, 1991, 29, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Cebul, R.Randomized, controlled trials using the metro firm system. Medical Care, 1991, 29(suppl.), SJ918.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Cebul, R. D., Dawson, N. V.Translating theory into practice: The metro firm system. Society of General Internal Medicine Newsletter, 1987, 10(5), 23.Google Scholar
5.Cohen, D. I., Breslau, D., Porter, D. K., et al. The cost implications of academic group practice: A randomized controlled trial. New England Journal of Medicine, 1986, 314, 1553–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Cohen, D. I., Breslau, D., Porter, D. K., et al. Academic group practice: The physician's view. Medical Care, 1987, 25, 686–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cohen, D. I., Breslau, D., Porter, D. K., & Hershey, C. O.Academic group practice: The patient's perspective. Medical Care, 1986, 24, 990–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Cohen, D. I., Dawson, N. V., Goldberg, H. I., & Hershey, C. O.Academic group practice (letter). New England Journal of Medicine, 1986, 315, 1420.Google Scholar
9.Cohen, D. I., Jones, P., Littenberg, B., & Neuhauser, D.Does cost information availability reduce physician test usage? Medical Care, 1982, 20, 286–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Cohen, D. I., Littenberg, B., Wetzel, C., & Neuhauser, D.Improving physician compliance with preventive medicine guidelines. Medical Care, 1982, 20, 1040–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Cohen, D. I., & Neuhauser, D. The metro firm trials: An innovative approach to ongoing randomized clinical trials. In Institute of Medicine (ed.), Assessing medical technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985, 529–34.Google Scholar
12.Cohen, S. J., Stookey, G. K., Katz, B. P., et al. Encouraging primary care physicians to help smokers quit. A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1989, 110, 648–52.Google Scholar
13.Cohen, S. J., Weinberger, M., Hui, S. L., et al. The impact of readings on physicians’ nonad-herence to recommended standards of medical care. Social Science Medicine, 1985, 21, 909–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Dawson, N. V.The metro firm system: Meeting the challenges of a changing health care environment. Health Matrix, 1988, 5, 2733.Google Scholar
15.Dawson, N. V.Organizing the metro firm system for research. Medical Care, 1991, 29(suppl.), SJ51925.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Ebert, T. H.Initiating a firm system at a community teaching hospital. Medical Care, 1991, 29(suppl.), SJ56570.Google Scholar
17.Gillespie, K. N., Romeis, J. C., Virgo, K. S., et al. Practice pattern variation between two medical schools. Medical Care, 1989, 27, 537–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Goldberg, H. I.Innovations and institutions: The metro firm system: A primer. Society for Internal Medicine Newsletter, 1988, 11(2), 45.Google Scholar
19.Goldberg, H. I.Ethical issues in administrative continuous improvement: Applying the concept of prior notification to the conduct of firm trials. Medical Care, 1990, 28, 822–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Goldberg, H. I., Cohen, D. I., & Hershey, C. O.A randomized controlled trial of academic group practice (letter). Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987, 258, 613–14.Google Scholar
21.Goldberg, H. I., Cohen, D. I., Hershey, C. O., et al. A randomized controlled group of academic group practice: Improving the operation of the medicine clinic. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987, 257, 2051–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Goldberg, H. I., & McGough, H.The ethics of ongoing randomization trials: Investigation amongst intimates. Medical Care, 1991, 29(suppl.), SJ4148.Google Scholar
23.Goldberg, H. I., Mullen, M., Ries, R. K., et al. Alcohol counseling in a general medicine clinic: A randomized, controlled trial of strategies to improve referral and show rates. Medical Care, 1991, 29(suppl.), SJ4956.Google Scholar
24.Halperin, W., & Neuhauser, D.MEU: A way of measuring efficient utilization of hospital services. Health Care Management Review, 1976, 1, 6370.Google ScholarPubMed
25.Hershey, C. O., Cohen, D. I., Goldberg, H. I., et al. Effect of an academic group practice on patient show rates: A randomized controlled trial. Medical Care, 1987, 25, 7277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Hershey, C. O., Dawson, N. V., McLaren, C. E., et al. Resident knowledge of charges: Are we asking the right questions? American Journal of Medical Science, 1987, 293, 182–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Hershey, C. O., Goldberg, H. I., & Cohen, D. I.The effect of computerized feedback coupled with a newsletter upon outpatient prescribing charges. Medical Care, 1988, 26, 8893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Hershey, C. O., Porter, D. K., Breslau, D., & Cohen, D. I.Influence of simple computerized feedback on prescription charges in an ambulatory clinic: A randomized clinical trial. Medical Care, 1986, 24, 472–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Hershey, C. O., Tomford, J. W., McLaren, C. E., et al. The natural history of intravenous catheter-associated phlebitis. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1984, 144, 1373–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Landefeld, C. S., Rosenthal, G. E., Aucott, J., et al. The Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center firm system. InternationalJournal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1992, 8, 325–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.McDonald, C. J., Hui, S. L., Smith, D. M., et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record: A two-year randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1984, 100, 130–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Mosteller, F.The contributions of firms: A fresh movement in medicine. Medical Care, 1991, 29(suppl.), SJ34.Google ScholarPubMed
33.Nerenz, D. R., Zajac, B. M., Miron, L. L., et al. Inpatient firms in a teaching hospital: The Henry Ford Hospital experience. Medical Care, 1991, 29(suppl.), SJ2630.Google Scholar
34.Neuhauser, D.Editorial. Medical Care, 1986, 24, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Neuhauser, D. The metro firm trials and ongoing randomization. In Tanur, J. M., Mosteller, F., Kruskal, W. H., et al., (eds.), Statistics: A guide to the unknown, 3rd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks, 1989, 2530.Google Scholar
36.Neuhauser, D.Parallel providers, ongoing randomization, and continuous improvement. Medical Care, 1991, 29(suppl.), SJ58.Google ScholarPubMed
37.Neuhauser, D., Cohen, D., Austin, S., et al. Ongoing patient randomization for better health care. Bulletin of the Cleveland Medical Library, 1985, 31, 57.Google Scholar
38.Office of Medical Applications of Research, National Institutes of Health. Health care delivery research using hospital firms, Workshop Summary, April 30–May 1,1990. Bethesda, MD: USPHS, NIH, OMAR, 1991, 17.Google Scholar
39.Ronan, L., & Stoeckle, J. D.An experimental ward improving care and learning. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1992, 8, 318–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Schubert, S. P., Billowitz, A., Gabinet, L., & Friedson, W.Effect of liaison psychiatry on attitudes toward psychiatry, rate of consultation and psychosocial documentation. General Hospital Psychiatry, 1989, 11, 7787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Simmer, T. L., Nerenz, D. R., Rutt, W. M., et al. A randomized, controlled trial of an attending staff service in general internal medicine. Medical Care, 1991, 29(suppl.), SJ3140.Google ScholarPubMed
42.Tierney, W. M., Hui, S. L., & McDonald, C. J.Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminds to perform preventive care: Effects on physician compliance. Medical Care, 1986, 24, 659–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Tierney, W. M., McDonald, C. J., Hui, S. L., & Martin, D. K.Computer predictions of abnormal test results: Effects on outpatient testing. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1988, 259, 1194–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Tierney, W. M., McDonald, C. J., Martin, D. K., et al. Computerized display of past test results: Effect on outpatient testing. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1987, 107, 569–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Tierney, W. M., Miller, M. E., Hui, S. L., & McDonald, C. J.Practice randomization and clinical research: The Indiana experience. Medical Care, 1991, 29(suppl.), SJ5764.Google ScholarPubMed
46.Tierney, W. M., Miller, M. E., & McDonald, C. J.The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 322, 14991504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Tomford, J. W., Hershey, C. O., McLaren, C. E., et al. Intravenous therapy team and peripheral venous catheter-associated complications: A prospective controlled study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1984, 144, 1191–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48.Vinicor, F., Cohen, S. J., Mazzuca, S. A., et al. DIABEDS: A randomized trial of the effects of physician and/or patient education on diabetes patient outcomes. Journal of Chronic Disease, 1987, 40, 345–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Waggoner, D. M., Frengley, J. D., Griggs, R. C., & Rammelkamp, C. H.A “firm” system for graduate training in general internal medicine. Journal of Medical Education, 1979, 54, 556–61.Google Scholar