Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T05:18:46.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetics of sorghum, maize, rice and sugar-cane resistance to the cereal stem borer, Chilo spp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

R. S. Pathak
R. S. Pathak
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Several species of Chilo are serious pests (stem borers) of sorghum, maize, rice and sugar-cane. Studies on genetics of resistance to Chilo species have been carried out only In a few cases. In maize and sorghum resistance to C. partellus, measured in terms of leaf-feeding, dead hearts and stem-tunnelling is polygenic. Both additive and non-additive gene effects are important in the inheritance of resistance to C. partellus. However, the importance of additive and non-additive gene effects in determining resistance, varies with the resistance parameter in two crops. Resistance to leaf-feeding and stem-tunnelling is governed predominantly by additive genes, while both additive and non-additive genes are important in the inheritance of dead hearts. The non-additive gene action, however, is of higher magnitude and more important in the inheritance of resistance to dead hearts in maize than that in sorghum. Recurrent selection using S1, S2 lines would be efficient in increasing levels of resistance both in sorghum and maize. Tolerance should be considered as an important factor in sorghum breeding for borer resistance.

The level of resistance in rice to C. suppressalis is low to moderate and appears to be under polygenic control. A recurrent selection programme using male sterile lines could be effective in improving the level of resistance. No information is available on genetics of resistance to Chilo spp. in sugar-cane.

Résumé

Plusieurs espèces de Chilo sont d'importants ravageurs de sorgho, de maïs, de riz et de la canne à sucre. Les ètudes sur la génétique de rèsistance aux Chilo spp. ont été conduites dans certains cas seulement. Dans le cas du maïs et du sorgho, la rèsistance au Chilo partellus est polygènique (évaluée en termes de dégâts foliaires, de casse des tiges, et des galeries). Les effets des génes additifs et non additifs sont importants dans l'acquisition de la résistance au C. partellus. Cependant, l'importance des effects des gènes additifs et non additifs dans le déterminisme de la résistance varie avec le paramétre de résistance lié aux deux plantes. La résistance aux dégâts foliaires et aux galeries des tiges est contrôlée d'une manière prédominante par les génes additifs, alors que les génes additifs et non additifs sont importants dans l'héritage de résistance de la casse des tiges. Cependant, l'action du gène non additif est de plus grande amplitude, et plus importante dans l'acquisition de la résistance à l'égard de la casse des tiges dans le maïs que dans le sorgho. L'utilisation fréquente des lignés S1, S2 serait efficace dans l'augmentation des niveaux de résistance aussi bien pour le sorgho que pour le maïs. La tolérance devrait être considérée comme un facteur important dans la séléction du sorgho pour la résistance aux foreurs des tiges.

Le niveau de résistance du riz au C. suppressalis est faible ou modéré, et semble être polygénique. Un programme de séléction utilisant fréquemment des lignées mâles stériles pourrait être efficace dans l'amélioration du niveau de résistance. Les informations concernant la résistance génétique de la canne à sucre aux Chilo spp. ne sont pas disponsibles.

Keywords

Chilo spp.sorghummaizericeresistancegeneticstoleranceinheritanceadditive and non-additive gene actionrecurrent selectionChilo spp.sorghomaïsrizrésistancegénétiquetolérancehéritageaction des génes additifs et non additifsfréquente selection
Type
Breeding and Resistance Genetics
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 11 , Special Issue 4-5: Tropical Stem Borers of Graminaceous Crops: A New Synthesis , October 1990 , pp. 689 - 699
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agrawal, B. L. and Taneja, S. L. (1989) Breeding for resistance to stem-borer (Chilo partellus Swinhoe) in sorghum. Proc. Int. Workshop on Sorghum Stem Borers, 17–20 Nov. 1987, ICRISAT Center, Patancheru, A. P. 502 324, India, pp. 159–168.Google Scholar
Ashraf, Mohammad, Fatima, Bilquis and Hussain, Sajjan (1986) Evaluation of sugar-cane varieties and mutant strains for resistance to sugarcane borers. Atomic Energy Agric. Res. Cent., Tondojam, Pakistan, Nucleus, Pakistan 3, 41–43.Google Scholar
Ampofo, J. K. O., Dabrowski, Z. T. and Omolo, E. O. (1986a) Registration of germplasm lines of maize. Crop Sci. 26, 650.Google Scholar
Ampofo, J. K. O., Saxena, K. N., Kibuka, J. G. and Nyangiri, E. O. (1986b) Evaluation of some maize cultivars for resistance to the stem-borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in western Kenya. Maydica 61, 379–389.Google Scholar
Barry, B. D., Zuber, M. S., Antonio, A. Q. and Darrah, L. L. (1983) Selection for resistance to the second generation of the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in maize. J. econ. Entomol. 6, 392–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. D. (1965) Resistance in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 10, 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhary, R. C., Khush, G. S. and Heinrichs, E. A. (1984) Varietal resistance to rice stem-borers in Asia. Insect Sci. Applic. 5, 447–463.Google Scholar
Chatterji, S. M., Sarup, P., Marwaha, K. K., Panwar, V. P. S., Siddiqui, K. H. and Bhamburkar, M. W. (1973) Studies on insect plant relationship, comparative tolerance of some elite indigenous maize lines to Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) under artificial infestation. Indian J. Entomol. 35, 156–159.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Z. T. and Kidiavai, E. L. (1983) Resistance of some sorghum lines to the spotted stalk borer, Chilo partellus under western Kenya conditions. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 119–126.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Z. T. and Nyangiri, E. O. (1983) Some field and screenhouse experiments on maize resistance to Chilo partellus under western Kenya conditions. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 109–118.Google Scholar
David, H. and Joseph, K. J. (1985) Nature and extent of losses in sugarcane caused by the internode borer, Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (Kapur). Proc. Sugarcane Technologists' Association, India 1983, received 1985, 47, 19–30.Google Scholar
Doggett, H. (1970) Sorghum. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Durbey, S. L. and Sarup, P. (1982) Morphological character-development and density of trichromes on varied maize germplasm in relation to preferential oviposition by the stalk borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). J. entomol. Res. 6, 187–196.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D. (1989) Breeding maize and sorghum for resistance to the European corn borer. In Proc. International Workshop on Sorghum Stem Borers, 17–20 Nov. 1987 ICRISAT Center, Patancheru, A. P. 502 324, India, pp. 169–175.Google Scholar
Hagi, H. M. (1984) Gene effects for resistance to stem-borer (Chilo partellus Swinhoe) in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). M.Sc. thesis. Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.Google Scholar
Jennings, C. W., Russell, W. A. and Guthrie, W. D. (1974) Genetics of resistance in maize to first-and second brood European corn borer. Crop Sci. 14, 394–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jotwani, M. G. (1978) Investigations on insect pests of sorghum and millets with special reference to host plant resistance: final technical report (1972–1977). IARI Research Bulletin (New Series) No. 2. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Jotwani, M. G. and Davies, J. C. (1979) Insect resistance studies on sorghum at international institutes and national programmes with special reference to India. In Biology and Breeding for Resistance to Arthropods and Pathogens in Agricultural Plants (Edited by Harris, M. K.). Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
Khush, G. S. (1984) Breeding rice for resistance to insects. Prot. Ecol. 7, 147–165.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, N. and Murty, K. N. (1981) Stem-borer resistance in sorghum. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 41, 167–169.Google Scholar
Omolo, E. O. (1983) Screening of local and exotic maize lines for stem-borer resistance with special reference to Chilo partellus. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 105–108.Google Scholar
Ortega, A., Vasal, S. K., Mihm, J. A. and Hershey, C. (1980) Breeding for insect resistance in maize. In Plants Resistance to Insects (Edited by Maxwell, F. G. and Jennings, P. R.), pp. 371–419, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Panwar, V. P. S., Marwaha, K. K. and Siddiqui, K. H. (1982) Response of “introduction nursery” comprising exotic and indigenous maize germplasms to the stalk borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) under artificial infestation J. entomol. Res. 6, 202–205.Google Scholar
Panwar, V. P. S. and Sarup, P. (1980) Differential development of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in various maize varieties. J. entomol. Res. 4, 28–33.Google Scholar
Pathak, R. S. (1983) Genetics of sorghum resistance to stem-borers. In Abstracts of Contributed Papers of the Fifteenth International Congress of Genetics, 12–21 December 1983, New Delhi, India, Pt 2. New Delhi, India: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Pathak, R. S. (1985) Genetic variation of stem-borer resistance and tolerance in three sorghum crosses. Insect Sci. Applic. 6, 359–364.Google Scholar
Pathak, R. S. (1988) Genetics of resistance to stem-borer, Chilo partellus in maize. Genome 30 (suppl. 1) 35.34.10. Abstracts: XVIth International Congress of Genetics, August 20–27, 1988, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Pathak, R. S. (1989) Gene effects for resistance to the spotted stem-borer (Chilo partellus Swinhoe) in sorghum. In Breeding Research: The key to the Survival of the Earth: Proc. 6th International Congress of the Society for the Advancement of Breeding Researches in Asia and Oceania (SABRO), August 21–25, 1989, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 231–234.Google Scholar
Pathak, R. S. (1990) Genetic expression of the spotted stem-borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) resistance in three maize crosses. In Proc. Second International Conference on Tropical Entomology, 31 July-5 August 1989, Nairobi, Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 11, (In press).Google Scholar
Pathak, R. S. and Olela, J. C. (1983) Genetics of host plant resistance in food crops with special reference to sorghum stem-borers. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 127–134.Google Scholar
Pathak, R. S. and Othieno, S. M. (1990) Inheritance of resistance to the spotted stem-borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize. Maydica 35, 247–252.Google Scholar
Rana, B. S. and Murty, B. R. (1971) Genetic analysis of resistance to stem borer in sorghum, Indian. J. Genet. Plant Breed. 31, 521– 529.Google Scholar
Rana, B. S., Singh, B. U. and Rao, N. G. P. (1985) Breeding for shootfly and stem-borer resistance in sorghum. In Proc. International Sorghum Entomology Workshop, 15–21 July 1984, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas USA pp. 347–360.Google Scholar
Rana, B. S., Singh, B. U., Rao, V. J. M., Reddy, B. B. and Rao, N. G. P. (1984) Inheritance of stem borer resistance in sorghum. Indian J. Gen. Plant Breed. 44, 7–14.Google Scholar
Russell, W. A., Lawrence, G. D. and Guthrie, W. D. (1979) Effects of recurrent selection for European corn borer resistance on other agronomic characters in synthetic cultivars of maize. Maydica 24, 33–47.Google Scholar
Sarup, P. (1980) Insect pest management in maize. In Breeding, Production and Protection Methodologies of Maize in India (Edited by Singh, J.), pp. 193–197. All India Co-ordinated Maize Improvement Project, IARI, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Sarup, P., Mukherjee, B. K., Marwaha, K. K., Panwar, V. P. S., Siddiqui, K. H. and Singh, N. N. (1975) Identification of a source of resistance to Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Colombian maize hybrid H207 and formulation of a suitable breeding procedure for its utilization. J. entomol. Res. 36, 1–5.Google Scholar
Saxena, K. N. (1986) Sorghum resistance/susceptibility to stem-borers. In ICIPE's Fourteenth Annu. Rep. 1986 pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. K. and Chatterji, S. M. (1972) Further studies on the nature of antibiosis in maize (Zea mays Linn.) against the maize stem-borer, Chilo zonellus (Swinhoe). Indian J. Entomol. 34, 11–19.Google Scholar
Seshu, Reddy K. V. (1983) Studies on the stem-borer complex of sorghum in Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 3–10.Google Scholar
Seshu, Reddy K. V. (1985) Relative susceptibility and resistance of some sorghum lines to stem-borers in Western Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 6, 401–404.Google Scholar
Singh, J. (1967) Studies on breeding in maize for resistance to top shoot borer (Chilo zonellus Swin). Ph.D. Thesis, P. G. School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Singh, J. (1983) Breeding for resistance to insect pests of maize. In Techniques of Scoring for Resistance to the Major Pests of Maize (Edited by Singh, J.), pp. 1–15. All India Coordinated Maize Improvement Project, IARI, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Singh, S. P. and Verma, A. N. (1988) Combining ability for stem-borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) resistance in sorghum. Insect Sci. Applic. 9, 665–668.Google Scholar
Sitch, L. A. (1989) Incompatibility barriers operating in crosses of Oryza sativa with related species and genera. In Proc. Nineteenth Stadler Genetics Symposium, University of Columbia, Missouri, USA. March 1989 (In press).Google Scholar
Taneja, S. L. and Leuschner, K. (1985) Methods of rearing, infestation and evaluation of Chilo partellus resistance in sorghum. In Proc. International Entomology Workshop. 15–21 July 1984, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA. pp. 175–188.Google Scholar
Temrak, S. A. (1985) The susceptibility to Chilo agamemnon Blesz (Lep: Grambidae) in two commercial varieties of sugarcane and factors affecting intensity of infestation. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypte 1982/83 No. 64, 1–7.Google Scholar
Temrak, S. A. and Negm, A. A. (1978) Simultaneous use of several damage criteria to evaluate differential response of certain sugarcane varieties to infestation by the purple-lined sugarcane borer, Chilo agamemnon Blesz. Proc. Fourth Conf. Pest Control, Sept. 30–Oct. 3, 1978 (Part 1), Cairo, Egypt: Academy of Scientific Research and Technology and National Research, pp. 167–178.Google Scholar
Vasal, S. K., Ortega, A. C. and Pandey, S. (1982) CIMMYT'S Maize Germplasm Management, Improvement, and Utilization Program. CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico.Google Scholar