Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:40:19.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanisms of resistance of lentil Lens culinaris Medikus, genotypes to the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

Alemtaye Andarge*
Affiliation:
Insect Biochemical Physiology Laboratory, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE 68583-0816, USA
M.C. Van Der Westhuizen
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of the Free State, PO Box 339, BFN 9300, South Africa
Get access

Abstract

Glasshouse studies were conducted to determine mechanisms of resistance of five genotypes of lentil Lens culinaris (Medikus) previously identified as resistant and moderately resistant to the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). A susceptible standard, ILL 8127, was also included. French Indigo had high levels of antibiosis, demonstrated by reduced reproductive period, fecundity and longevity, while Spanish Brown had high levels of antixenotic and tolerance components of resistance. Based on overall resistance, French Indigo was the most resistant genotype followed by Spanish Brown. These genotypes could be a source for resistance to A. pisum. All five genotypes had varying levels of antibiosis, antixenosis and tolerance components of resistance compared with ILL 8127.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackman, R. L. and Eastop, V. F. (1984) Aphids on the World 's Crops: Identification Guide. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
De Loach, C. J. (1974) Rates of increase of populations of cabbage, green peach, and turnip aphids at constant temperatures Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 67 332340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, D. (2000) Insect Pest Management. CAB International Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallun, R. L. (1972) Genetic interrelationships between host plants and insects J. Environ. Qual. 1 259265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, P. A., Lamb, R. J. and Smith, M. A. H. (1993) Variability in life history traits of the aphid, A. pisum (Harris) from sexual and asexual populations Oecol. 94 330338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maiteki, G. A., Lamb, R. J. and Ali-Khan, S. T. (1986) Seasonal abundance of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae), in Manitoba field peas Can. Entomol. 118 601607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MSTAT-C (1990) User's guide to MSTAT-C. A software program for the design, management and analysis of agronomic research experiments. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
Painter, R. H. (1951) Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. Macmillan New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. (1993) Conditioning host plant affects Antixenosis and antibiosis to Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) J. Econ. Entomol. 86 602606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, L. M. and Quisenberry, S. S. (1997) Categorization of six wheat plant introduction lines for resistance to the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) J. Econ. Entomol. 90 14081413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J. A. and Innayatullah, C. (1988) Assessment of experimental designs for green bug (Homoptera: Aphididae) antixenosis test J. Econ. Entomol. 81 12461250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J. A., Starks, K. J. and Burton, R. L. (1987) Plant resistance studies with the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae), a new United States wheat pest J. Econ. Entomol. 80 944949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, I. J. and White, P. F. (1977) Simple estimation of intrinsic rates for increase and tetranychid mites J. App. Ecol. 14 757766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar