This paper was first presented at the annual American Political Science Association convention in Washington, August 1986. It was revised for presentation at St. Michael's College, Burlington, Vermont, and Brown University in October 1986 and again for the Mellon Colloquium on Religion in Political Culture at Princeton University in February 1987. The author thanks fellow panelists at the APSA convention, commentators at the subsequent presentations, and colleagues and friends in Princeton and Cambridge, Massachusetts, who have given critical support to this project, most especially Elizabeth B. Clark.

1. Miranda, José Porfirio, Communism in the Bible (Maryknoll, N.Y., 1981), 13.Google Scholar

2. Gutiérrez, Gustavo, A Theology of Liberation, trans. Inda, Sister Caridad and Eagleson, John, (Maryknoll, N.Y., 1973), 145.Google Scholar

3. Hirschman, Albert O., Journeys towards Progress: Studies in Economic Policymaking in Latin America (New York, 1963), 90.Google Scholar On this episode, see also Page, Joseph, The Revolution That Never Was: Northeast Brazil, 1955–1964 (New York, 1972)Google Scholar, and Furtado's recollections, “Modernización versus desarrollo: Un reportaje da Celso Furtado,” Crítica y utopia 4 (03 1981): 95–104.Google Scholar

4. Cited in DeKadt, Emmanuel, Catholic Radicals in Brazil (Oxford, 1970), 75.Google Scholar

5. For a portrait of these activists, see Souza, Luis Alberto Gómez de, A JUC: Os estudiantes Catolicos e a política (Petropolis, 1984)Google Scholar; and Mainwaring, Scott, The Catholic Church and Politics in Brazil, 1916–1985 (Stanford, 1986), chap. 4.Google Scholar

6. Fleet, Michael, The Rise and Fall of Chilean Christian Democracy (Princeton, 1985), chaps. 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Hirschman, , Journeys towards Progress, 220–23.Google Scholar

8. Gurrieri, Adolfo, “José Medina Echavarria: An Intellectual Profile,” CEPAL Review (12 1979): 156.Google Scholar For ECLA's history, see Love, Joseph L., “Raul Prebisch and the Origins of the Doctrine of Unequal Development,” Latin American Research Review 14 (1980): 45–72Google Scholar; and Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, “The Originality of a Copy: CEPAL and the Idea of Development,” CEPAL Review, Part 2 (1977): 7–32.Google Scholar

9. For a portrait of this process, see Mutchler, David E., The Church as a Political Factor in Latin America (New York, 1971).Google Scholar

10. Freire's principal works are Pedagogy of the Oppresed (New York, 1970)Google Scholar and Education for Critical Consciousness (New York, 1973).Google Scholar For an evaluation of his work and its impact, see Collins, Denis, Paulo Freire, His Works, Life, and Thought (New York, 1977)Google Scholar, and Schipiani, Daniel J., Conscientization and Creativity: Paulo Freire and Christian Education (Baltimore, 1984).Google Scholar

11. Chonchol, Jacques and Solar, Julio Silva, Hacia un mundo comunitario: condiciones de una política social-cristiana (Santiago, 1951).Google Scholar

12. On Torres, see Gerassi, John, ed., Revolutionary Priest: The Complete Writings and Messages of Camilo Torres (New York, 1971).Google Scholar For further materials on the theology of revolution, see Goday, Samuel Silva, El pensamiento cristiano revolucionario en América Latina y el Caribe (Salamanca, 1981)Google Scholar, and a book of documents edited by Gheerbrant, Alain, The Rebel Church (Middlesex, Eng., 1974).Google Scholar

13. On this process, see Smith, Brian H., “Churches and Human Rights in Latin America,” in Churches and Politics in Latin America, ed. Levine, Daniel H. (Beverly Hills, 1979), 155–94Google Scholar; Cleary, Edward L., Crisis and Change: The Church in Latin America Today (Maryknoll, N.Y., 1985)Google Scholar; and Lernoux, Penny, Cry of the People, 2d ed. (New York, 1982).Google Scholar For a portrait of the Medellín meeting, see Prada, Hernán, Crónica de Medellín (Bogotá, 1975).Google Scholar The bishops' report is available in English in the Second Annual Conference of Latin American Bishops, The Church in the Present Day Transformation of Latin America in Light of the Council (Washington, D.C., 1970).Google Scholar

14. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, “The Consumption of Dependency Theory in the United States,” Latin American Research Review 12 (1977): 10.Google Scholar

15. Fidel Castro is cited in Frank, Andre Gunder, Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution? (New York, 1969), 407.Google Scholar

16. On Illich, see Bastide, Roger, “Sociology of Latin American Religions: The Contribution of CIDOC,” Crosscurrents (Fall 1976): 363–72.Google Scholar See Mutchler, , Church as a Political FactorGoogle Scholar for a broader discussion of these changes.

17. On Gutiérrez, see Brown, Robert McAfee, Gustavo Gutiérrez (Atlanta, 1980)Google Scholar, and Gibellini, Rossino, ed., Frontiers of Theology in Latin America (Maryknoll, N.Y., 1979), 311–13.Google Scholar

18. Cited in Broderick, Walter J., Camilo Torres: A Biography of the Priest-Guerillero (New York, 1975), 257.Google Scholar

19. The literature on CEBs is vast and growing. For an introduction, see Cleary, , Crisis and Change, chap. 5Google Scholar, and Berryman, Phillip, Liberation Theology (New York, 1986), chap. 4.Google Scholar

20. On the debate between developmentalists and radicals within the church, see exchanges in CELAM, Liberación: Diálogos en el CELAM (Bogotá, 1974)Google Scholar, and Socialismo y socialismos en América Latina (Bogotá, 1977).Google Scholar On Puebla, see Berryman, Phillip, “What Happened in Puebla,”Google Scholar in Levine, , ed., Churches and Politics, 55–86Google Scholar; and Eagleson, John and Scharper, Philip, eds., Puebla and Beyond (Maryknoll, N.Y., 1979).Google Scholar

21. A range of writings by liberation theologians can be found in Gibellini, , ed., Frontiers of TheologyGoogle Scholar, and Torres, Sergio and Eagleson, John, eds., Theology in the Americas (Maryknoll, N.Y., 1976).Google Scholar

22. Cited in Morais, J. F Regis de, Os Bispos e a política no Brasil (São Paulo, 1982), 151.Google Scholar

23. Gutiérrez, Gustavo, We Drink from Our Wells: The Spiritual Journey of a People (Maryknoll, N.Y., 1985), 160.Google Scholar

24. On the human rights movements, see Diboye, Carolyn Cook, “The Roman Catholic Church and the Political Struggle for Human Rights in Latin America,” Journal of Church and State 24 (Autumn 1982): 497–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25. Jellin, Elizabeth, “Los movimientos sociales en la Argentina contemporanea: Una introducción a su estudio,” in Jellin, , ed. Los nuevos movimientos sociales (Buenos Aires, 1985), 39.Google Scholar See also Mainwaring, Scott and Viola, Eduardo, “New Social Movements, Political Culture, and Democracy: Brazil and Argentina,” Telos 61 (Fall 1984): 17–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26. On the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo, see Simpson, John and Bennett, J., The Disappeared and the Mothers of the Plaza (New York, 1985)Google Scholar, and Baldez, Lisa, “In the Spirit of Antigone: The Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo” (unpublished ms., Princeton University, 1986).Google Scholar

27. For an introduction to this question, see Berryman, Phillip, The Religious Roots of Rebellion: Christians in Central American Revolution (Maryknoll, N.Y., 1984)Google Scholar, and Montgomery, Tommie Sue, “Liberation and Revolution: Christianity as a Subversive Activity in Central America,” in Trouble in Our Backyard, ed. Diskin, Martin (New York, 1984), 75–100.Google Scholar

28. On Nicaragua, see Dodson, Michael, “Nicaragua: The Struggle for the Church,” in Religion and Political Conflict in Latin America, ed. Levine, Daniel H. (Chapel Hill, 1986), 79–105.Google Scholar Opposing views are O'Brien, Conor Cruise, “God and Man in Nicaragua,” Atlantic Monthly 257 (08 1986): 50–72Google Scholar, and Belli, Humberto, Breaking Faith: The Sandinista Revolution and its Impact on Freedom and Christian Faith in Nicaragua (Westchester, Ill., 1985).Google Scholar

29. For materials on the relation between church organizing and peasant rebels, see Berryman, , Religious Roots of Rebellion, part IIGoogle Scholar, and Pearce, Jennie, Promised Land: Peasant Rebellion in Chalatenango. El Salvador (London, 1986), chaps. 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30. For materials on radical Christianity and proletarians in Brazil, see Mainwaring, Scott, “Brazil: The Catholic Church and the Popular Movement in Nova Igaucu, 1974–1985,” in Levine, ed., Religion and Political Conflict, 124–55Google Scholar; Moises, José Alvaro, Licoes de liberdade e de opressão: O novo sindicalismo e a política (Rio de Janiero, 1982)Google Scholar; and Greenhalg, L. E. et al. , Fe e participão popular (São Paulo, 1984).Google Scholar On Chile, see Smith, Brian, “Chile: Deepening the Alliance of Working Class Sectors to the Church in the 1970s,” in Levine, ed., Religion and Political Conflict, 156–86.Google Scholar For a critique of the workers' party, see Sader, Emir, “The Workers' Party in Brazil,” New Left Review 165 (09/10 1987): 93–103.Google Scholar

31. For example, see Nolan, Molly, “Economic Crisis, State Policy, and Working Class Formation in Germany, 1870–1900,” in Working-Class Formation: Nineteenth-Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States, ed. Katznelson, Ira and Zolberg, Aristide R. (Princeton, 1986), 352–96.Google Scholar

32. The issue of “popular religion” and its relation to politics is the subject of intense debate but very few careful studies. An optimistic view is in Scannone, Juan Carlos, “Evangelization of Culture, Liberation, and ‘Popular’ Culture: The New Theological Synthesis in Latin America,” in The Church and Culture since Vatican II, ed. Gremillion, Joseph (Notre Dame, 1985), 74–89Google Scholar; more skeptical is Osiel, Mark J., “Going to the People: Popular Culture and Intellectuals in Brazil,” Archivs Europennes de Sociologie 25 (1984): 245–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Levine, Daniel H., “Religion, the Poor, and Politics in Latin America Today,” in Levine, ed., Religion and Political Conflict, 15.Google Scholar For a suggestive treatment of “anticipatory” radical communitarianism, see the seminal article on North American utopianism: Bestor, Arthur Jr., “Patent-Office Models of the Good Society: Some Relationships between Social Reform and Westward Expansion,” American Historical Review 58 (04 1953): 505–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34. Reilly, Charles A., “Latin America's Religious Populists,” in Levine, ed., Religion and Political Conflict, 42–58.Google Scholar

35. On the libertarian socialists, who had the most accessible ideological articulation, see two general histories: Viñas, David, Anarquistas en América Latina (Mexico City, 1983)Google Scholar, and Gómez, Alfredo, Anarquismo y anarcosindicalismo en América Latina (Madrid, 1980)Google Scholar, and the following monographs: Hart, John, Anarchism and the Mexican Working Class, 1860–1931 (Austin, Tex., 1978)Google Scholar; Blanchard, Peter, The Origins of the Peruvian Labor Movement, 1883–1919 (Pittsburgh, 1982)Google Scholar; and DeShazo, Peter, Urban Workers and Labor Unions in Chile, 1902–1927 (Madison, 1983).Google Scholar

36. Antonio Díaz Soto y Gama's phrase cited in Hart, , Anarchism and the Mexican Working Class, 124.Google Scholar

37. On Mariátegui, see Chavarria, Jesús, José Carlos Mariátegui and the Rise of Modern Peru, 1890–1930 (Albuquerque, 1979).Google Scholar

38. Wolin, Sheldon, Politics and Vision (Boston, 1960), 98.Google Scholar

39. Gutiérrez, , We Drink from Our Wells, 160.Google Scholar

40. Cited in Berryman, , “What Happened at Puebla,” 162.Google Scholar

41. Boff, Leonardo, “The Need for Political Saints,” Crosscurrents (Fall 1980): 384.Google Scholar

42. For Puritans and other groups in the English revolution, see Hill, Christopher, The World Turned Upside Down (Middlesex, Eng., 1985)Google Scholar, and “God and the English Revolution,” in The Collected Essays of Christopher Hill, ed. Hill, (Amherst, 1966), 2:321–42.Google Scholar