Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-03T04:40:09.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dalmia Cement Ltd. v. National Bank of Pakistan

International Champer of Commerce, Arbitration Tribunal.  18 December 1976 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International law in general — Relation to municipal law — Definition of war — Whether the same in international law and common law

States as international persons — In general — Sovereignty and independence — Conclusiveness of statements of the Executive — Statement concerning existence of state of war — Whether conclusive in international arbitration under International Chamber of Commerce Rules — Whether conclusive if arbitrator applies municipal law

International organization and administration — The United Nations — Legal nature of the United Nations — Obligations of membership — Armed conflict between members — Whether capable of amounting to war — Presumption against existence of state of war between members of the United Nations

Disputes — Arbitration — In general — The law applied by arbitral tribunals — Arbitration under International Chamber of Commerce Rules — Conclusiveness of Executive statements

War and neutrality — In general — Effects of outbreak of war — On private contracts — Arbitration clause in bank guarantee

War and neutrality — In general — Termination of war — Armistice agreement and agreement to restore normal relations — Whether terminating war — Intention of parties

War and neutrality — In general — Definition and technical meaning of war — Whether one definition of war exists for all purposes Distinction between war and armed conflict not amounting to war — Whether objective or subjective — Animus belligerendi — Evidence of — Broadcast by Head of State — Relevance of parties' membership of the United Nations — Presumption against the existence of a state of war — Declaration of war — Hostilities between India and Pakistan in September 1965 — Whether amounting to war

Termination of war — Whether war can be terminated by armistice agreement — Effects of Tashkent Declaration, 1966

Effects of outbreak of war — On private contracts — Arbitration clause

Arbitration — International commercial arbitration under International Chamber of Commerce Rules — Role of arbitrator — Whether statement by Executive that a State was at war conclusive in international arbitration — Whether statement conclusive if arbitrator is applying municipal law.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)