Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T11:43:51.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v. Netherlands

European Court of Human Rights.  11 June 2013 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Right to a fair trial — Right to a court — Right of access to a court — Whether absolute right — Applicants bringing proceedings in Netherlands in connection with 1995 Srebrenica massacre — Netherlands courts granting United Nations immunity — Applicants lodging application with European Court of Human Rights against Netherlands — Standing of applicants — Admissibility of applicants’ complaints under Article 6 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Scope of case before European Court of Human Rights — Whether plausible basis in international law for immunity of United Nations — Whether Netherlands compelled to provide remedy against United Nations in its own courts — Whether grant of immunity to United Nations serving legitimate purpose — Whether disproportionate — Netherlands Supreme Court refusing to refer to Court of Justice of European Union for preliminary ruling — Whether summary reasoning sufficient — Whether Netherlands violating applicants’ right of access to court — Whether Netherlands violating Article 6 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

International organizations — United Nations — Immunity — Nature of immunity — Netherlands granting United Nations immunity from domestic civil jurisdiction — Whether grant of immunity to United Nations serving legitimate purpose — Whether disproportionate — Whether Netherlands violating applicants’ right of access to a court — Whether plausible basis in international law for immunity of United Nations — Rules of international law relating to immunity — Applicability — Special character of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 as human rights treaty — Purpose of United Nations — International human rights law — Relevance of allegation of genocide — Whether civil claim overriding immunity from suit

Treaties — Interpretation — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — United Nations Charter, 1945 — Special character of Convention as human rights treaty — Convention forming part of international law — Relevant rules of international law — International law rules on State immunity — International human rights law — Conflicting obligations under international agreements — Prevailing obligation — Purposes of United Nations — United Nations Charter — Presumption in interpretation — Netherlands courts finding United Nations immune from domestic jurisdiction under international law — Whether Netherlands violating Article 6(1) of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)