Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:21:47.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Nation-State and the (Re)Construction of Religious, Ethnic and Gender Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2024

Azadeh Kian*
Affiliation:
Distinguished Professor of Sociology, Director of the Center for Gender and Feminist Studies and Research CEDREF, université Paris Cité

Extract

Nationalism, nationhood, and ethnicity, as Eric Hobsbawm argued, are social processes constructed essentially from above, yet cannot be understood unless also analyzed from below.1 Inspired by European Orientalism, the intellectual advocates of Western-oriented nationalism attempted to establish a new Iranian identity based on Persian language and Iran's pre-Islamic past.2 This made Iranian nationalism an attractive ideology for some political elites, and was later endorsed by the Pahlavi dynasty (1925–79) when nationalist ideology replaced Iranianness with Persianity. In this conception, there was no room for the ethnic diversity of a nation-state that is the heir of an ancient empire. The elites’ aspirations to uniformity put pressure on members of ethnic groups to conform their way of life to a new model of Iranianness, Persianized and pro-Western. Every nonconforming element was regarded as a sign of backwardness and possible threat to the modern nation and its territorial integrity.

Type
Round Table
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Iranian Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atabaki, Touraj, and Zürcher, Erik J., eds. Men of Order: Authoritarian Modernization under Atatürk and Reza Shah. London: I.B. Tauris, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Review 43, no. 6 (July 1991): 12411299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, Foucault. Sécurité, territoire, population, Cours au Collège de France, année 1977–78. Paris: Editions Gallimard, 2004.Google Scholar
Hill Collins, Patricia. Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage in association with the Open University, 1997.Google Scholar
Hobsbawn, Eric. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. Boston: South End Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Juteau, Danielle. L'ethnicité et ses frontières. Montréal: Les presses de l'université de Montréal, 1999.Google Scholar
Kian, Azadeh. Rethinking Gender, Ethnicity and Identity in Iran. An Intersectional Approach to National Identity. London and New York: I.B.Tauris, Bloomsburg Publishing, 2023.Google Scholar
Miller, Ruth. The Limits of Bodily Integrity: Abortion, Adultery, and Rape Legislation in Comparative Perspective. Aldershot, Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Shahi, Afshin, and Abdoh-Tabrizi, Ehsan, “The Shi'ite State and the Socioeconomic Challenges of the Sunni Communities in Iran. Historical and Contemporary perspectives.” In Sites of Pluralism. Community Politics in the Middle East, edited by Oruc, Firat, 87113. London: Hurst & Company, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostafa, Vaziri. Iran as Imagined Nation: The Construction of National Identity. New York: Paragon House, 1993.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira, and Anthias, Floya. Woman-Nation-State. London: Macmillan, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zia-Ebrahimi, Reza. “Self-Orientalization and Dislocation: The Uses and Abuses of the ‘Aryan’ Discourse in Iran.” Iranian Studies 44, no. 4 (2011): 445472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar