Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T16:27:02.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where did they Bury the Kings of the IIIrd Dynasty of Ur?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

P. R. S. Moorey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper was first read, as the Bonham Carter Memorial Lecture, to the British School of Archaeology in Iraq, in London, in June 1981.

Although the “Royal Cemetery” at Ur remains among the best-known archaeological discoveries ever made in Iraq, it still offers many complex and teasing problems of chronology and interpretation. These have to be resolved before the evidence it offers may confidently be used to illustrate particular aspects of Sumerian custom and society in the third millennium B.C. On present reckoning this concentration of hundreds of superimposed graves, cut into successive levels of rubbish, extended over at least 600 years from about 2650 to 2050 B.C. In Woolley's view it included two groups of “royal” burials. The earlier, of the archaeological period Early Dynastic III A, is the better known of the two, comprising sixteen shaft-graves or “death-pits”, with multiple burials. They were separated by an interval of between four and five centuries, and by numerous single private graves, from the rather less well-known building complex described by Woolley as the “Mausolea” of the Ur III kings (c. 2112–2004 B.C.). In 1977 I attempted to elucidate the status and social function of the people buried in the Early Dynastic “royal” graves, suggesting that it was too soon to assume that all the rulers of Sumerian city-states at this time had been buried in this particular way. Not only is it to be doubted whether the men (?) buried in the three tombs 1618, 1631 and 1648 were of the same high rank as those in the other thirteen “royal” tombs, but they may even have been of men, and more particularly of women, whose status and special privileges had more to do with the character of the cult of the city-god of Ur than with any secular authority such as kings and queens in the modern sense.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , Spring 1984 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Remarkably the cemetery is hardly mentioned in Alster, B. (ed.), Death in Mesopotamia (Copenhagen, 1980)Google Scholar.

2 The basic report is Woolley, C. L., Ur Excavations (hereafter UE) II: The Royal Cemetery (London, 1934)Google Scholar; an important re-assessment of the chronology is to be found in Nissen, H. J., Zur Datierung des Königsfriedhofes von Ur (Bonn, 1966)Google Scholar; relevant are recent studies of the earlier grave sequences at Ur, cf. Kolbus, S., Akkadica 30 (1982), 1 ff.Google Scholar; Iraq 45 (1983), 7 ff.Google Scholar; Gockel, W., Akkadica 32 (1983), 32 ff.Google Scholar; Die Stratigraphie und Chronologic der Ausgrabungen des Diyala-Gebiets und der Stadt Ur in der Zeit von Uruk/Eanna IV bis zur Dynastie von Akkad (Rome; Bretschneider, 1982)Google Scholar.

3 Woolley, C. L., UE VI: The Ur III Period (Philadelphia, 1974)Google Scholar; it is important to appreciate that this report was written by 1935 and not revised for publication in 1974, long after Woolley's death.

4 Expedition, Fall 1977, 24 ffGoogle ScholarPubMed.

5 Particularly if Boese's reading of the “Mari Bead” is accepted: ZA 68 (1978), 6 ffGoogle Scholar. If Mes-kalam-dug was indeed Mes-ane-pada's father, as Boese argued, this would make sense of the Nin-tur inscription on a copper vessel in Mes-kalam-dug's grave (PG 755) (cf. Hallo, W. W., Early Mesopotamian Royal Titles (New Haven, 1957, 30 ff.)Google Scholar, since this is the name of Mes-ane-pada's wife.

6 UE VI, 1.

7 Cf. Jacobsen, Th., The Sumerian King List (Chicago, 1939), 173 ffGoogle Scholar.

8 Buchanan, B. W., JAOS 74 (1954), 147 ffGoogle Scholar.

9 H. J. Nissen, op. cit., passim.

10 Kramer, S. N., The Sumerians (Chicago, 1963), 70 ffGoogle Scholar.

11 Antiquaries Journal 11 (1931), 343 ff.Google Scholar; UE VI (1974) written by 1935; Excavations at Ur (1954), 150 ffGoogle Scholar.

12 UE VI, 7.

13 Excavations at Ur (1954), 150Google Scholar; names modernized.

14 UE VI, 8.

15 Orientalia 46 (1977), 223Google Scholar.

16 UE VI, 29, 101: Baghdad: IM 14322 (U. 16530): E. Sollberger, UET VIII (II), no. 22.

17 UE VI, 1 ff.; on which the following account draws.

18 UE VI, 1, Pl. 2b.

19 UE VI, 22.

20 UE II, 142; cf. Bienkowski, P. A., Levant 14 (1982), 80 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 JAOS 74 (1954), 150Google Scholar.

22 H. J. Nissen, op. cit., 119 ff.

23 In Oppenheim, A. L., Ancient Mesopotamia (Chicago, 1977), 335 ff.Google Scholar; for other chronologies see Hallo, W. A., “Gutium”, RLA III, 713 ffGoogle Scholar.

24 UE II, Pl. 274.

25 UE II, 187 ff.

26 Excavations at Ur (1954), 111Google Scholar.

27 Zettler, R. L. in Gibson, M. and Biggs, R. D. (ed.), Seals and Sealing in the Ancient Near East (hereafter Seals and Sealing) (Undena, Malibu, 1977), 33 ffGoogle Scholar.

28 UE II, Pl. 211: 290 (U. 12470).

29 UE II, Pl. 211: 292 (U. 12471).

30 Franke, J. A. in Seals and Sealing, 61 ff.Google Scholar; Collon, D., Catalogue of Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum: Cylinder Seals II (London, 1982), 125 ff.Google Scholar; 145 ff.

31 UE II, Pl. 206: 188 (U. 7956); for the inscribed seal U. 7953 see UE II, 314, Pls. 191, 205: 178.

32 UE II, 412 (U. 7951), 498 (U. 10788, 10790, 10795, U. 11102).

33 PGs nos. 35, 643, 689, 692, 697, 743, 903, 968, 991, 1003; P.J. Sargonid 101, 139.

34 UE II, Pl. 205: 180 (U. 9679), Pl. 206: 190 (U. 9681), pp. 434–5.

35 UE II, Pl. 221 (U. 9914).

36 UE II, Pl. 214: 350 (U. 11442), p. 500.

37 UE II, 500.

38 UE II, Pl. 214: 339 (U. 11458); Pl. 213: 317 (U. 11457).

39 UE II, 500.

40 UE II, 206, 500.

41 UE II, 192 ff.

42 UE II, 194.

43 Excavations at Ur (1954), 112Google Scholar.

44 Cf. UE II, 212–3.

45 Orientalia 46 (1977), 220 1Google Scholar.

46 Preusser, C., Die Paläste in Assur (Berlin, 1955), 27, Pl. 3, 46Google Scholar; Haller, A., Gräber und Grufte von Assur (Berlin, 1954), 170 ff.Google Scholar; Andrae, W., Das wiedererstandene Assur (Munich, 1977), 194 ffGoogle Scholar.

47 Weidner, E. F., AfO 13 (1939–1941), 204 ff.Google Scholar; Ebeling, E., Stiftungen und Vorschriften für assyrische Tempel (Berlin, 1954), 18 ffGoogle Scholar.

48 Tadmor, H., Eretz Israel 5 (1958), 150 ffGoogle Scholar. (Hebrew with English summary on p. 93*).

49 Luckenbill, D. D., Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia (Chicago, 1927) II, 310Google Scholar; for Elamite royal tombs, cf. Ghirshman, R., Tchoga-Zanbil II (Paris, 1968), 60 ff., Fig. 23–30Google Scholar; Stève, M.-J., Tchoga Zanbil III (Paris, 1967), 103Google Scholar, no. 61, Pl. XXI: 1–3; Haft Tepe: Reiner, E., AfO 24 (1973), 87 ffGoogle Scholar.

50 Brinkman, J. A. in Studies Presented to A. Leo Oppenheim (Chicago, 1964), 27Google Scholar.

51 Grayson, A. K., Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles (Locust Valley, 1975), 142Google Scholar.

52 Michalowski, P., Orientalia 46 (1977), 220, n. 3Google Scholar.

53 Khalesi, Y. M., Mesopotamia 12 (1977), 53 ffGoogle Scholar. Mesopotamian Monumental Secular Architecture in the Second Millennium B.C. (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms, 1975), 148 ffGoogle Scholar.

54 I am most grateful to Dr. Stephanie Dalley for advice on Mari.

55 Lenzen, H. J., UVB XIX (1963), 35, Pl. 23aGoogle Scholar; for the text see Falkenstein, A., Baghdader Mitteilungen 2 (1963), 42, no. 2Google Scholar.

56 Laroche, E., in Schaeffer, C. F. A., Ugaritica III (Paris, 1956), 102 ff.Google Scholar; I am most grateful to Professor H. J. Houwink ten Cate for calling this text to my attention.

57 Professor O. R. Gurney and Dr. I Singer kindly advised me on this point.

58 Akurgal, E., Ancient Civilization and Ruins of Turkey (Istanbul, 1970), 288–9Google Scholar.

59 Cf. Gurney, O. R., The Hittites (London, 1975), 164 ff.Google Scholar; Otten, H., Hethitische Totenrituale (Berlin, 1958), 106 ffGoogle Scholar.

60 Matthiae, P., Ugarit-Forschungen 11 (1979), 563 ffGoogle Scholar.

61 Woolley, C. L., Alalakh (London, 1956), 95 ff.Google Scholar; Fig. 36, Pls. XX–XXI.

62 Schaeffer, C. F. A., Syria 28 (1951), 16, Fig. 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 UE VI, 43 ff., Pl. 57; Weadock, P. N., Iraq 37 (1975). 101 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Kramer, S. N., JCS 21 (1967), 104 ff.Google Scholar; cf. Wilcke, C., Actes de la XVII Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale (ed. Finet, A.; Brussels, 1970), 81 ffGoogle Scholar.

65 Wilcke, C. in Garelli, P. (ed.), Le Palais et la Royauté (Paris, 1974), 180, n. 67Google Scholar.

66 Michalowski, P., JCS 28 (1976), 169 ffGoogle Scholar.

67 Whiting, R., JCS 28 (1976), 182Google Scholar.

68 Michalowski, P., Mesopotamia 12 (1977), 90Google Scholar.

69 Kramer, S. N., JCS 21 (1967), 114Google Scholar: 71, 74.

70 Legrain, L., UET III (London, 1947), 76Google Scholar, col. I: 6; 21, rev. 4; Michalowski, , Orientalia 46 (1977), 221, n. 10Google Scholar.

71 Michalowski, P., Orientalia 46 (1977), 221Google Scholar.

72 Grégoire, J. P., Inscriptions et archives administratives cunéiformes (Rome, 1981), 18Google Scholar.

73 Orientalia 46 (1977), 223Google Scholar.

74 Ibid.

75 UE VI, 36 ff., Pl. 56.

76 UE VI, 38.

77 Ellis, R., Foundation Deposits in Ancient Mesopotamia (New Haven, 1968), 63 ffGoogle Scholar.

78 Limet, H. in van Donzel, et al., Le Temple et le Culte (Istanbul, 1975), 80 ffGoogle Scholar.

79 UE VI, 37.

80 In reviewing the data for royal burial places in Mesopotamia, I have assumed that the deification of kings from Ur III through Isin-Larsa into the First Dynasty of Babylon did not substantially affect the attitude to the place of burial, however significant its impact in other ways.

81 Moorey, P. R. S., Expedition, Fall 1977, 24 ffGoogle Scholar.