Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T00:57:36.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Description and outcome evaluation of Jigsaw: an emergent Irish mental health early intervention programme for young people

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

L. O’Keeffe ,
A. O’Reilly ,
G. O’Brien ,
R. Buckley  and
R. Illback
L. O’Keeffe*
Affiliation:
Planning and Evaluation Officer, Headstrong: The National Centre for Youth Mental Health, Dublin, Ireland
A. O’Reilly
Affiliation:
Education and Training Officer, Headstrong: The National Centre for Youth Mental Health, Dublin, Ireland
G. O’Brien
Affiliation:
Director of Clinical Governance, Headstrong: The National Centre for Youth Mental Health, Dublin, Ireland
R. Buckley
Affiliation:
Director of Quality Assurance, Headstrong: The National Centre for Youth Mental Health, Dublin, Ireland
R. Illback
Affiliation:
CEO and Senior Evaluation Researcher at REACH Evaluation, Louisville, Kentucky, and Deputy CEO, Headstrong, Dublin, Ireland
*
*Address for correspondence: L. O’Keeffe, PhD, Headstrong: The National Centre for Youth Mental Health, 16 Westland Square, Pearse Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. (Email: lynsey.okeeffe@headstrong.ie)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

Jigsaw is an early intervention mental health service developed by Headstrong which provides support to young people, aged 12–25 years, in 10 communities across Ireland. This study aimed to profile young people who availed of Jigsaw, in one calendar year, and to provide evidence that Jigsaw’s model facilitates the reduction of psychological distress.

Methods

Participants were 2420 young people who received support, directly or indirectly, from Jigsaw. Demographic details, including age, gender, presenting issues and referral pathways, captured on the Jigsaw Data System were described and psychological distress was assessed using the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) questionnaires.

Results

A gender balance was almost observed and the majority of participants were between 15 and 17 years old. The most common presenting issue was anxiety and the most common referral sources were self, parent, general practitioner, school and Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS). Participants reported high levels of psychological distress pre-intervention and levels were significantly lower post intervention.

Conclusions

Although a lack of control group limits interpretation of the study findings, this study provides emerging evidence that Jigsaw is an accessible and effective service which plays a key role in the continuum of mental health care for young people in Ireland.

Keywords

Community servicesearly interventionyouth mental health

Information

Type
Original Research
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 32 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Youth Mental Health , March 2015 , pp. 71 - 77
Copyright
© College of Psychiatrists of Ireland 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bewick, BM, Gill, J, Mulhern, B, Barkham, M, Hill, AJ (2008). Using electronic surveying to assess psychological distress within the UK university student population: a multi-site pilot investigation. E-Journal of Applied Psychology 4, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, M, Coughlan, H, Clarke, M, Harley, M, Kelleher, I (2013). The Mental Health of Young People in Ireland: A Report of the Psychiatric Epidemiology Research across the Lifespan (PERL) Group. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland: Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Clayton, R, Illback, RJ (2013). Needs Analysis and Programme Description. Headstrong: Dublin, Irelandhttp://www.headstrong.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Economic_Justification_Paper_1_-_Needs_Analysis_and_Programme_Description_v21.pdf. Accessed 2nd December 2014.Google Scholar
Connell, J, Barkham, M (2007). CORE-10 User Manual, Version 1.1. CORE System Trust & CORE Information Management Systems Ltd.Google Scholar
Department of Health & Children (2006). A Vision for Change’ Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy. Stationery Office: Dublin.Google Scholar
Dooley, B, Fitzgerald, A (2012). My World Survey: National Study of Youth Mental Health in Ireland. Headstrong – The National Centre for Youth Mental Health, UCD School of Psychology: Dublin, Ireland.Google ScholarPubMed
Dooley, B, Fitzgerald, A (2013). Methodology on the My World Survey (MWS): a unique window into the world of adolescents in Ireland. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 7, 12–22.Google Scholar
Gaynor, K, Brown, JSL (2013). Self-referrers to community workshops: who are they and why do some participants not consult with their GP about their mental health difficulties? Journal of Mental Health 22, 227–236.Google Scholar
Goldenring, JM, Cohen, E (1988). Getting into adolescent heads. Contemporary Pediatrics 5, 75–90.Google Scholar
Illback, RJ, Bates, T, Hodges, C, Galligan, K, Smith, P, Sanders, D, Dooley, B (2010). Jigsaw: engaging communities in the development and implementation of youth mental health services and supports in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Mental Health 19, 422–435.Google Scholar
McGorry, P, Bates, T, Birchwood, M (2013). Designing youth mental health services for the 21st century: examples from Australia, Ireland and the UK. British Journal of Psychiatry 202, 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, K, Murray, G, Prior, S, Stark, L (2011). An evaluation of a school counselling service with direct links to child and adolescent mental health (CAMH) services. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 39, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, K, Powell, A, Patulny, R, Flaxman, S, McDermott, S, Oprea, I, Gendera, S, Vespignani, J, Sitek, T, Abello, D, Katz, I (2009). Headspace Evaluation Report. Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, New South Wales.Google Scholar
Purcell, R, Jorm, AF, Hickie, IB, Yung, AR, Pantelis, C, Amminger, GP, Glozier, N, Killackey, E, Phillips, LJ, Wood, SJ, Harrigan, S, Mackinnon, A, Scott, E, Hermans, DF, Guastella, AJ, Kenyon, A, Mundy, L, Nichles, A, Scaffidi, A, Spiliotacopoulos, D, Taylor, L, Tong, JPY, Wiltink, S, Zmicerevska, N, McGorry, P (2014). Demographic and clinical characteristics of young people seeking help at youth mental health services: baseline findings of the Transitions study. Early Intervention in Psychiatry. doi: 10.1111/eip.12133.Google Scholar
Rickwood, DJ, Telford, NR, Parker, AG, Tanti, CJ, McGorry, P (2014). Headspace – Australia’s innovation in youth mental health: who are the clients and why are they presenting? Medical Journal of Australia 2, 1–4.Google Scholar
Twigg, E, Barkham, M, Bewick, BM, Mulhern, B, Connell, J, Cooper, M (2009). The Young Person’s CORE: development of a brief outcome measure for young people. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 9, 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twigg, E, McInnes, B (2010). YP-CORE User Manual, Version 1.0. Rugby. CORE Information Management Systems Ltd.Google Scholar