Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T00:39:29.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

School refusal, parental control and wider systems: lessons from the management of two cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Stephen Coulter
Stephen Coulter*
Affiliation:
Child and Family Clinic, Craigavon Area Hospital, 63 Lurgan Road, Portadown, Craigavon, Co Armagh, N. Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two cases of school refusal are presented. From the experience of these two cases, and support from the literature, early assessment of parental control in cases of school refusal is advocated. When parental control, even with professional therapeutic support, is not sufficient to effect an early return to school, intervention in the wider systems which are organised around the problem is recommended.

Keywords

School refusalParental controlWider systemsAssessment
Type
Case Reports
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 146 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hersov, L. School refusal. In: Rutter, M, Hersov, L, editors. Child and Adolescent Psychiaty. London: Blackwell, 1985.Google Scholar
2.Pearson, G. Prison of love: the reification of the family in family therapy. In: Armistead, N, editor. Reconstructing Social Psychology. Baltimore: Penguin, 1974.Google Scholar
3.Hoffnan, L, Long, L. A systems dilemma. Family Process 1969; 15: 303–11.Google Scholar
4.Pattison, EM. Social system psychotherapy. Am J Psychother 1973; 27: 296–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Aponte, HJ. The family-school interview: an eco-structural approach. Family Process 1976; 15:303–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Keeney, B, Sprenkle, D. Ecosystemic epistemology: critical implications for the aesthetics and pragmatics of family therapy. Family Process 1982; 21 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Maturana, H, Varela, F. Autopoiesis and cognition: the realisation of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Fruggeri, L, Matteini, M. Larger systems? Beyond a dualistic approach to the process of change. Ir J Psychol 1988; 9 (1): 183–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Anderson, H, Goolishian, H. Human systems as linguistic systems: preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process 1988; 27(4): 371–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Coulter, S, McCune, N. Changing categories in families and communities in Northern Ireland. Context 21, Winter 1994.Google Scholar
11.Bowman, G, Jeffcoat, P. The application of systems ideas in a social services field-work team J Fam Ther 1990; 12(3).Google Scholar
12.Harper, DJ, Spellman, P. Consultation to a professional network: reflections of a would-be consultant. J Fam Ther 1914; 16 (4).Google Scholar
13.Leventhal, T, Weinberger, G, et al.Therapeutic strategies with school phobias. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1967; 13: 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Carl, D, Jurkovic, GJ. Agency triangles: problems in agency – family relationships. Family Process 1983; 22: 441–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed