Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Targeting the government in the referendum: the aborted 2016 Italian constitutional reform

  • Danilo Di Mauro (a1) and Vincenzo Memoli (a2)

Abstract

This study investigates the factors explaining voting in the 2016 Italian referendum on constitutional reform. As we show through voting alignments within the Parliament and key aspects of the electoral campaign, this was a case where the government took the leadership of the entire referendum process, transforming it into a plebiscite. Within this context, we hypothesize that key elements explaining voting choices follow a government-support vs. opposition dynamics. Employing Italian National Elections Studies Association pre/post-referendum survey, we estimate the effects of factors increasing predictability (e.g. party closeness, ideology, social cleavage) or uncertainty (e.g. government performance, the economy) of voting choices. The resulting logistic regression models show that the leading role of the government in the referendum reshapes the impact of factors explaining voting choices. While some lose significance, others follow a pro- or anti-government logic.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Aguiar-Conraria, L. and Magalhães, P.C. (2010), ‘Referendum design, quorum rules and turnout’, Public Choice 144(1–2): 6381.
Bellucci, P., Garzia, D. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2017), ‘Understanding electoral politics in contemporary Italy: policy preferences, personalisation, partisanship and the economy’, Contemporary Italian Politics 9(1): 37.
Bowler, S. and Donovan, T. (2002), ‘Do voters have a cue? Television advertisements as a source of information in citizen–initiated referendum campaigns’, European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 777793.
Calise, M. (2007), ‘The presidentialization, Italian style’, in T. Poguntke and P. Webb (eds), The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 88106.
de Vreese, C.H. and Semetko, H.A. (2004), ‘News matters: influences on the vote in the Danish 2000 euro referendum campaign’, European Journal of Political Research 43(5): 699722.
de Vreese, C.H. (ed.) (2007), The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns: An International Perspective, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Evans, G. (1999), ‘Europe: a new electoral cleavage?’, in G. Evans and P. Norris (eds), Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-Term Perspective, London: Sage, pp. 207222.
Franklin, M.N. (2002), ‘Learning from the Danish case: a comment on Palle Svensson’s critique of the Franklin thesis’, European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 751757.
Franklin, M.N., Van der Eijk, C. and Marsh, M. (1995), ‘Referendum outcomes and trust in government: public support for Europe in the wake of Maastricht’, West European Politics 18(3): 101117.
Gabel, M. (2000), ‘European integration, voters and national politics’, West European Politics 23(4): 5272.
Hobolt, S.B. (2006), ‘How parties affect vote choice in European integration referendums’, Party Politics 12(5): 623647.
Hobolt, S.B. (2009), Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, D., Thorsen, E. and Wring, D. (2016), ‘EU referendum analysis 2016: media, voters and the campaign’. Retrieved 3 January 2018 from http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/24337/1/EU%20Referendum%20Analysis%202016%20-%20Jackson%20Thorsen%20and%20Wring%20v1.pdf
Johnston, R., Blais, A., Gidengil, E. and Nevitte, N. (1996), The Challenge of Direct Democracy: The 1992 Canadian Referendum, Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
LeDuc, L. (2002), ‘Opinion change and voting behavior in referendums’, European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 711732.
LeDuc, L. and Pammett, J.H. (1995), ‘Referendum voting: attitudes and behaviour in the 1992 constitutional referendum’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 28(1): 333.
Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Paldam, M. (2000), ‘Economic voting: an introduction’, Electoral Studies 19(2): 113121.
Lupia, A. (1992), ‘Busy voters, agenda control, and the power of information’, American Political Science Review 86(2): 390403.
Morel, L. (2011), ‘Referenda’, in B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser and L. Morlino (eds), International Encyclopedia of Political Science, Vol. 1, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 22262230.
Morlino, L. (ed.) (1991), Costruire la democrazia: gruppi e partiti in Italia, Vol. 292, Bologna: Il Mulino.
Parisi, M. (2015), Il Patto del Nazareno. 18 gennaio 2014–31 gennaio 2015, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
Pasquino, G. (2016), ‘Renzi: the government, the party, the future of Italian politics’, Journal of Modern Italian Studies 21(3): 389398.
Sinnott, R. (2002), ‘Cleavages, parties and referendums: relationships between representative and direct democracy in the Republic of Ireland’, European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 811826.
Vatter, A. (2000), ‘Consensus and direct democracy: conceptual and empirical linkages’, European Journal of Political Research 38(2): 171192.

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Di Mauro and Memoli Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Targeting the government in the referendum: the aborted 2016 Italian constitutional reform

  • Danilo Di Mauro (a1) and Vincenzo Memoli (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed