We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 August 2008
This study discusses the pattern of development of child-related policies, particularly in recent years. The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lacks interest in public engagement in child-related issues, whereas Komeito, the recent coalition partner of the LDP, has been the driving force of recent developments. The study investigates the historical development of three child-related policies: namely, child allowance, childcare services, and the facilitation of work–life balance of employees, and discusses the role of Komeito in the recent coalition government. An analytical model is provided to explain why Komeito was active in the development of child allowance, but not other policies. On the whole, the participation of Komeito in the coalition government seems to give impetus to the development of child-related polices, but the scope of that party's behavior is constrained, due to its position as a minor partner in the coalition government.
1 The record was marked in 1966, the year called ‘Hinoe-uma’. ‘Hinoe-uma’ comes every 60 years, and it was widely believed that those girls born in that year would bring evil to their family. Therefore, many Japanese preferred to avoid childbirth in that particular year.
2 United Nations, World Population Policies 2005 (Geneva: United Nations, 2006), p. 264Google Scholar.
3 Higuchi, Yoshio, ‘Ikujikyugyo seido no jissho bunseki’ [Empirical Analysis of the Childcare Leave System], in Shakaihoshokenkyujo (ed.), Gendai kazoku to shakai hosho [Contemporary Family and Social Security] (Tokyo: Tokyodaigaku Shuppankai, 1994), pp. 181–204Google Scholar; Yoko, Morita, ‘Kosodate ni tomonau disuinsentibuno kanwasaku’ [Measures to Relax Disincentives of Childcare], in Yoshio, Higuchi and Policy Research Institute of Ministry of Finance (eds), Shoshika to nihon no keizaishakai [Falling Birthrate and Japanese Economy and Society] (Tokyo: Nihonhyoronsha, 2006), pp. 49–80Google Scholar; Shigeno Yukiko, ‘Shuro to shussan, ikuji no ryoritsu – kigyo no ikuji shien to hoikujo no shusseiritsu kaifuku heno kouka’ [Balancing Employment, Childbirth and Childcare – the Effect of Corporate Support and Nursery School on the Recovery of the Birthrate], in Higuchi Yoshio and Policy Research Institute of Ministry of Finance, pp. 81–114; Yukiko, Shigeno and Katsumi, Matsuura, ‘The Effects of Child-Care Leave, Working Hours and Day Nurseries on Fertility in Japan’, Osaka City University Economic Review, 39: 97–113.Google Scholar
4 Komeito once dissolved in 1994 and reunited in 1998. The formal English name of the party after the reunion is New Komeito. To avoid confusion, however, only Komeito is used here. It should be noted that the formal Japanese name is Komeito even after 1998.
5 William, Riker, The Theory of Political Coalition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Abram, de Swaan, Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1973)Google Scholar; Michael, Laver and Norman, Schofield, Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998)Google Scholar; Carol, Mershon, The Costs of Coalition (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
6 Maurice, Wright, ‘Who Governs Japan? Politicians and Bureaucrats in the Policy-making Processes’, Political Studies, 47: 939–54.Google Scholar
7 Chalmers, J. Johnson, MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar; Michio, Muramatsu and Krauss, Ellis S., ‘The Conservative Policy Line and the Development of Patterned Pluralism’, in Yamamura, Kozo and Yasuda, Yasukichi (eds), The Political Economy of Japan, Volume 1: The Domestic Transformation (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987), pp. 516–54Google Scholar; Pempel, T.J., ‘The Unbundling of “Japan Inc.”: The Changing Dynamics of Japanese Policy Formation’, in Pyle, Kenneth B. (ed.), The Trade Crisis: How will Japan Respond? (Seattle: University of Washington, 1987)Google Scholar; Calder, Kent, Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political Stability in Japan 1949–1986 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Ramseyer, J. Mark and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, Japan's Political Marketplace (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Kazuo, Yoshida, Kanryo hokai: Atarashii kanryozo wo motomete [Bureaucracy Collapse: Seeking a New Image of Bureaucracy] (Tokyo: Nihonhyoronsha, 1997)Google Scholar; Cerase, Francesco Paolo, ‘Japanese Bureaucracy in Transition: Regulating Deregulation’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68 (4): 629–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Masato, Shimizu, Kantei shudo – Koizumi Junichiro no kakumei [Leadership by Prime Minister's Office – the Revolution of Junichiro Koizumi] (Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbunsha, 2005).Google Scholar
8 Takashi, Inoguchi and Tomoaki, Iwai, Zoku Giin no Kenkyu [Research on Tribe Diet Members] (Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbunsha, 1987)Google Scholar; Curtis, Gerald L., The Japanese Way of Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Schoppa, Leonard J., ‘Zoku Power and LDP Power: A Case Study of the Zoku Role in Education Policy’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 17 (1): 79–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tomohito, Shinoda, Kantei no Kenryoku [Power of the Prime Minister's Office] (Tokyo: Chikuma Shinsho, 1996)Google Scholar; Browne, Eric C. and Kim, Sunwoong, ‘Factional Rivals and Electoral Competition in a Dominant Party: Inside Japan's Liberal Democratic Party, 1958–1990’, European Journal of Political Research, 42: 107–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Leduc, Benoit, ‘The Anatomy of the Welfare-Zoku: The Institutional Complementarity of the Party Commissions and the National Reform Councils in LDP Decision Making’, Pacific Affairs, 76 (4): 569–92Google Scholar; Kensuke, Takayasu, ‘Prime-Ministerial Power in Japan: A Re-Examination’, Japan Forum, 17 (1): 163–84.Google Scholar
9 See, for example, the special issue of Leviathan entitled ‘Renritsu seiken ka no seitou saihen to seisaku kettei’ [Reorganization of Party System and Policy-Making under Coalition Government] (Tokyo: Mokutakusha, 1998); Pekkanen, Robert, ‘Japan's New Politics: The Case of the NPO Law’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 26 (1): 111–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mulgan, Aurelia George, ‘The Dynamics of Coalition Politics in Japan’, Asia Pacific Review, 7 (2): 66–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tamura, Shigenobu, Toyoshima, Norio, Koeda, Yoshito and Niwa, Fumio, Nihon no renritsu seiken [Coalition Government in Japan] (Tokyo: Shingaku shuppan, 2005)Google Scholar.
10 OECD, Society at a Glance: OECD Social Indicators – 2005 Edition (Paris: OECD, 2005)Google Scholar.
11 United Nations, World Population Prospects: The 2002 Revision Population Database (Geneva: United Nations, 2003).
12 OECD, Extending Opportunities: How Active Social Policy Can Benefit Us All (Paris: OECD, 2005), p. 76Google Scholar.
13 Immervoll, Herwig and Barber, David, Can Parents Afford to Work? Childcare Costs, Tax-Benefit Policies and Work Incentives, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper 31 (Paris: OECD, 2005), p. 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 OECD, Society at a Glance.
15 Kent Calder, Crisis and Compensation.
16 Campbell, John C., How Policies Change: The Japanese Government and the Aging Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992), p. 371.Google Scholar
17 Maeda Yukio, ‘Saikin no jijiseronchosa ni okeru seito shijiritsu to naikaku shijiritsu [Party Support and Cabinet Support in the Recent Opinion Survey]’, Chuochosaho, 581, Online: http://www.crs.or.jp/58111.htm
18 The data are for the 43rd election for the House of Representatives, according to the Association for Promoting Fair Elections, Dai 43 kai shugiin sosenkyo ni okeru nenreibetsu tohyoritsu [Voter Turnout by Age in the 43rd Election for the House of Representatives] (Tokyo: Association for Promoting Fair Elections, 2004). Online: http://www.akaruisenkyo.or.jp/various/09/index.html
19 Masajuro Shiokawa, Education committee, House of Representative, 26 May 1987.
20 Tokyo Shimbun, 4 July 2003.
21 Kanter, Rosabeth M., ‘Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women’, American Journal of Sociology, 82 (5): 965–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Yumiko, Mikanagi, Josei to seiji [Women and politics] (Tokyo: Shinhyoron, 1999), pp. 88–9Google Scholar.
23 Mainichi Shimbun, 16 January 2006.
24 Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, 17 May 2006.
25 For example, see Nippon Keidanren, Keizai 3 dantai kyosai sinnen shukuga pati go no kyodo kishakaiken ni okersu okuda kaicho hatsugen yoshi [Summary of the speech of the chairman Okuda at the press conference after the new year celebration party held by thee business associations] (Tokyo: Nippon Keidanren, 2005), Online. http://www.keidanren.or.jp/japanese/speech/kaiken/2005/0105.html
26 Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, ‘Shussei zengo no shugyo henka ni kansuru tokei’ no gaikyo – Jinko dotai shokugyo sangyo betsu tokei to 21seiki shusseiji judan chosa no rinkeji bunseki [The Overview of ‘The Statistics of the Change in Employment before and after Childbirth’ – the Linkage Analysis of the Statistics of Population Dynamics by Work and Industry and the Chronological Survey on Childbirth in the 21st Century] (Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, 2004).
27 Yomiuri Shimbun, 5 January 2006.
28 Cabinet Office, Shoshika taisaku ni kansuru tokubetsu yoron chosa [Special Survey on the Countermeasures to Falling Birthrate] (Tokyo: Cabinet Office, 2004), Online: http://www8.cao.go.jp/survey/tokubetu/h16-syousika.pdf
29 Hideki, Wada (2006) ‘Jinko gensho de hanei ka suibo ka [Will Japan Prosper or Decline with The Population Reduction?]’, Bungeishunju, 84 (7) (May 2006): 151–54.Google Scholar
30 John C. Campbell, How Policies Change, p. 367.
31 Gerald L. Curtis, The Japanese Way of Politics, p. 24.
32 Ibid. p. 25.
33 Yomiuri Shimbun, 23 April 2006.
34 Gerald L. Curtis, The Japanese Way of Politics, pp. 263–70.
35 Mainichi Shimbun, 12 October 1999.
36 Sankei Shimbun, 8 September 2004.
37 For instance, see Cabinet Office, Shoshika shakai hakusho, Heisei 16 nen ban [White paper on the society of falling birthrate, 2004 edition] (Tokyo: Cabinet Office, 2005), Online: http://www8.cao.go.jp/shoushi/whitepaper/w-2004/html-h/index.html
38 Kazuhiko, Yokoyama, ‘Jido teate seido no seido kaikaku’ [The Reform of the Chid Allowance System], in Yokoyama, and Hidenori, Tada (eds), Nihon shakai hosho no rekishi [The History of Social Security in Japan] (Tokyo: Gakubunsha, 1991)Google Scholar.
39 The calculation excludes the ‘Hinoe-uma’ year. The figure is 2.02 when that year is included.
40 Kent Calder, Crisis and Compensation, p. 372.
41 Ministry of Health and Welfare, Koseihakusho [Annual Report of Health and Welfare] 1971 (Tokyo: Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1972). Online: http://wwwhakusyo.mhlw.go.jp/wpdocs/hpaz197101/body.html
42 Akemi, Kita, ‘Nihon no jidoteate seido no tenkai to henshitsu: Jo (The Development and Transformation of the Child Benefit System in Japan: Part I)’, Ohara shakaimondai kenkyujo zasshi, 524, p. 20.Google Scholar
43 Economic Planning Agency, Annual report on lifestyle 1990 (Tokyo: Economic Planning Agency, 1990)Google Scholar.
44 A comment of Kenzo Muraoka, the Chief Cabinet Secretary in early 1998, quoted from Sankei Shimbun, 24 December 1998.
45 Cabinet Office, Shoshika taisaku ni kansuru tokubetsu yoron chosa.
46 Mainichi Shimbun, 21 November 2003.
47 Tokyo Shimbun, 28 December 2005.
48 Ministry of Health and Welfare before the reorganization of government ministeries in 2001.
49 Ministry of Education before the reorganization of government ministeries in 2001.
50 For a classic analysis of bureaucratic behavior, see Niskanen, William A., Bureaucracy and Public Economics (revised edition) (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1994)Google Scholar.
51 Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Shoshika taisaku purasu wan [Policies for Falling Birthrate Plus One] (Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, 2002)Google Scholar.
52 Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Jisedai ikusei shien ni kansuru tomen no torikumi hoshin [Current Policies about the Support for the Upbringing of the Next Generation] (Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, 2003).Google Scholar
53 Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Heisei 16 nendo josei koyo kanri kihon chosa [The Basic Survey on the Labor Management of Women in 2004] (Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, 2005)Google Scholar.
54 Cabinet Office Japan, Danjo kyodo sankaku shakai ni kansuru seron chosa [The Survey on Equal Participation Society] (Tokyo: Cabinet Office Japan, 2005)Google Scholar.
55 Tokyo Shimbun, 4 October 2005.
56 Mainichi Shimbun, 7 December 2005.
57 Mainichi Shimbun, 14 June 2005.
