Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T16:06:52.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Behavioral Primacy Interacts with Short-Term Marketing Tactics to Influence Subsequent Long-Term Brand Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2005

ARCH G. WOODSIDE  and
MARK D. UNCLES
ARCH G. WOODSIDE
Affiliation:
Boston College, woodsiar@bc.edu
MARK D. UNCLES
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney, m.uncles@unsw.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

In a new purchasing environment (e.g., where a consumer moves to a new city), do consumers tend to keep buying the first brand that they try? If so, a behavioral primacy effect might be at work. Behavioral primacy exists when consumers tend to repeat-buy the first brand that they purchased more often than other brands that are bought in the same purchase environment. This report assumes the physical experience of buying and using the first brand is satisfactory, and that all competing brands are available in adjacent spaces (as in a supermarket or on a website). This article presents findings that demonstrate a behavioral primacy effect: purchasing a brand in the first week was found to have a significant impact on how often a brand was subsequently bought. Furthermore, initial experience in combination with marketing influence tactics (such as specific prices, coupons, and advertising) greatly increases the probability of purchase of a given brand. The findings support the focus by many marketers on attracting consumers to try their brand first. One rationale for this strategy is that in mundane product categories, if a brand experience is satisfactory, continuing to buy the first-brand bought helps to conserve cognitive effort for a consumer's more important concerns.Assistance in data analysis by Eric Goodwin, Boston College, is acknowledged with gratitude. Partial financial support from an ARC research grant is acknowledged (DP0344446).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Advertising Research , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 229 - 240
Copyright
© Copyright © 1960-2005, The ARF

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnould, Eric J., Linda L. Price, and George M. Zinkhan. Consumers. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2004.
Bargh, John A. “Losing Consciousness: Automatic Influences on Consumer Judgment, Behavior, and Motivation.” Journal of Consumer Research 29, 2 (2002): 280–85.Google Scholar
Barnard, Neil, and Andrew S. C. Ehrenberg. “Advertising: Strongly Persuasive or Nudging?” Journal of Advertising Research 37, 1 (1997): 21–31.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Gregory S., Rashi Glazer, and Kent Nakamoto. “Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes.” Journal of Marketing Research 31, 3 (1994): 339–50.Google Scholar
Charlton, Peter, Andrew S. C. Ehrenberg, and Bryan Pymont. “Buyer Behavior under Mini-Test Conditions.” Journal of the Market Research Society 14, 2 (1972): 171–83.Google Scholar
East, Robert. The Effect of Advertising and Display: Assessing the Evidence. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press, 2003.
East, Robert, and Kathy Hammond. “The Erosion of Repeat-Purchase Loyalty.” Marketing Letters 7, 2 (1996): 163–71.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. Repeat Buying: Theory and Applications, 2nd ed. New York: North-Holland, 1988.
Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C., and Peter Charlton. “An Analysis of Simulated Brand Choice.” Journal of Advertising Research 13, 1 (1973): 21–33.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C., and Gerald J. Goodhardt. “New Brands: Near-Instant Loyalty.” Journal of Marketing Management 16, 6 (2000): 607–17.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C., Kathy Hammond, and Gerald J. Goodhardt. “The After-Effects of Price-Related Consumer Promotions.” Journal of Advertising Research 34, 4 (1994): 11–21.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C., John Scriven, and Neil Barnard. “Advertising and Price.” Journal of Advertising Research 37, 3 (1997): 27–35.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C., Mark D. Uncles, and Gerald J. Goodhardt. “Understanding Brand Performance Measures: Using Dirichlet Benchmarks.” Journal of Business Research 57, 12 (2004): 1307–25.Google Scholar
Eskin, G. J., and P. H. Baron. “Effects of Price and Advertising in Test Market Experiments.” Journal of Marketing Research 14, 4 (1994): 499–508.Google Scholar
Foxall, Gordon R. “The Substitutability of Brands.” Managerial and Decision Economics 20, 5 (1999): 241–57.Google Scholar
Hays, W. L. Statistics, 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1994.
Hebets, Eileen. “Subadult Experience Influences Adult Male Choice in an Arthropod: Exposed Female Wolf Spiders Prefer Males of a Familiar Phenotype.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 100, 23 (2003): 13390–95.Google Scholar
Jedidi, K., C. F. Mela, and S. Gupta. “Managing Advertising and Promotion for Long-Run Profitability.” Marketing Science 18, 1 (1999): 1–22.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Konrad. King's Solomon's Ring. New York: Penguin Books, 1952/1997.
Motes, William H., and Arch G. Woodside. “Field Test of Package Advertising Effects on Brand Choice Behavior.” Journal of Advertising Research 24, 1 (1984): 39–47.Google Scholar
Motes, William H., and Arch G. Woodside. “Purchase Experiments of Extra-Ordinary and Regular Influence Strategies Using Artificial and Real Brands.” Journal of Business Research 53, 1 (2001): 15–35.Google Scholar
Muthukrishnan, A. V. “Decision Ambiguity and Incumbent Band Advantage.” Journal of Consumer Research 22, 1 (1995): 98–109.Google Scholar
Muthukrishnan, A. V., and Frank Kardes. “Persistent Preferences for Product Attributes: The Effects of the Initial Choice Context and Uninformative Experience.” Journal of Consumer Research 28, 1 (2001): 89–104.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Leon, David Bednall, Elizabeth Cowley, Aron O'Cass, Judith Watson, and Leslie Kanuk. Consumer Behaviour, 2nd ed. Sydney: Prentice Hall, 2001.
Tellis, Gerald J. “Advertising Exposure, Loyalty and Brand Purchase: A Two-Stage Model of Choice.” Journal of Marketing Research 25, 2 (1988): 134–44.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, The MIT Press, 2002.
Wellan, Dee M., and Andrew S. C. Ehrenberg. “A Successful New Brand: Shield.” Journal of the Market Research Society 30, 1 (1988): 35–44.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. D. Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002.
Wright, Malcolm, Byron Sharp, and Gerald J. Goodhardt. “Purchase Loyalty is Polarised into Either Repertoire or Subscription Patterns.” Australasian Marketing Journal 10, 3 (2002): 7–20.Google Scholar
Zaltman, Gerald. How Customers Think. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.