Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T21:16:44.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Economic Evaluation of a Multi-Area Recreation System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Michael E. Wetzstein
Michael E. Wetzstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia
Get access

Extract

Researchers as well as planners have been concerned with the impact of augmenting an existing recreation system with new recreational areas. That is, they are concerned with the substitution or duplication of services stemming from additional numbers of recreational areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , December 1982 , pp. 51 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armington, P. S. “Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 16:1(1969):159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, O. R. and D. Brewer. “Estimation of Net Social Benefits from Outdoor Recreation.” Econometrica, 39(1971):813–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, C. J., Fisher, A. C., and Smith, V. K.. “An Econometrics Evaluation of Generalized Consumer Surplus Measure: The Mineral King Controversy.” Econometrica, 44:6(1976):1259–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawson, M. and Knetsch, L.. Economics of Outdoor Recreation, Johns Hopkins Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Gorman, W. M. “Community Preference Fields.” Econometrica, 21(1953):63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, H. A.J.Aggregation in Economic Analysis: An Introductory Survey, Princeton University, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, H. W. and Goodwin, J. T.. Economic Evaluation of Water Orientation Recreation in the Preliminary Texas Water Plan, Texas Water Development Board, September 1968.Google Scholar
Rausser, G. C. and Oliveira, R. A.. “An Econometric Analysis of Wilderness Area Use.” J. of Amer. Stat. Assoc. 71:354(1976):276–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinden, J. A. “A Utility Approach to the Valuation of Recreational and Aesthetic Experiences.” Amer. J. of Agr. Econ., 56(1974):61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital.” The Rev. of Econ. Studies, 23 (1955-1956):101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strotz, R. H. “The Utility Tree: A Correction and Further Appraisal.” Econometrica, 27(1959):482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzstein, M. E. “An Econometric Analysis of California Wilderness Use with Emphasis on Measuring the Effects of Introducing New Areas.” Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Davis, 1978.Google Scholar
Wetzstein, M. E. and Green, R. D.. “Use of Principal Component Atrractiveness Indexes in Recreation Demand Function.” W. J. of Agr. Econ. 3(1978):11–21.Google Scholar
Wetzstein, M. E., Green, R. D., and Eisner, G. H.. “Estimation of Wilderness Use Functions for California: An Analysis of Covariance Approach.” J. of Leis. Res., 14(1982):16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzstein, M. E. and McNeely, J. G. Jr.. “Specification Errors and Inference in Recreation Demand Models.” Amer. J. of Agr. Econ. 62(1980):798–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. R. “Consumer Behavior Models: Time Allocation, Consumer Assembly, and Outdoor Recreation.” An Economic Study of the Demand for Outdoor Recreation, Cooperative Regional Research Technical Committee, Reno, Nevada, Rept. No. 2, June 16-18, 1970.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. R.The Demand for Non-Urban Outdoor Recreation in Texas: 1968–2000, Texas A&M University, Texas Agr. Exp. Sta., June 1, 1972.Google Scholar