Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T22:33:06.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economics of Alternative Beef Cattle Genotype and Management/Marketing Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Kenneth W. Stokes
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Clemson University
Donald E. Farris
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Thomas C. Cartwright
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University
Get access

Extract

Two questions commonly raised by cow-calf producers are, “What type of beef animal is most profitable?” and “Can profits be increased by maintaining ownership of calves through the stocker and feeding stages?”

These two questions are highly interrelated as performance in cow-calf stage carries over into the Dostweanine staees.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System. Federal Reserve Bulletin. Washington, D.C., various issues, 1972-79.Google Scholar
Joandet, G. E. and Cartwright, T. C., “Modeling Beef Production System.J. Animal Sci. 41 (1975): 1238-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, J. O.Application of a Beef Cattle Production Model to the Evaluation of Genetic Selection Criteria.” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M, 1977.Google Scholar
Sanders, J. O. and Cartwright, T. C.A General Cattle Production System Model Part 1—Structure of the Model.Agri. Systems, 4(1979a):217–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, J. O. and Cartwright, T. C.A General Cattle Production System Model Part 2—Procedures Used for Simulating Animal Performance.Agri. Systems, 4(1979b):289309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schake, L. M., Ljungdahl, P. W., and Egenolf, R. C.Establishing and Operating Inter- and Intrafirm Comparisons for Feedlots.Mimeo. College Station: Texas A&M, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Kenneth W.Economics of Alternative Beef Genotypes and Cattle Management/Marketing Systems.” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M, 1980.Google Scholar
Stuth, J. W., Kirby, D. R., Chmielewski, R. E., and Long, C. R.Integration of Forage Resources for Livestock Production Systems on Texas Rangelands—Progress Report.Beef Cattle Field Day Report—McGregor—1978, Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Report No. 78-1, 1978.Google Scholar
Texas A&M University. Texas Crop and Livestock Budgets. Texas Agr. Ext. Serv., B-1241, 1977.Google Scholar
Texas Department of Agriculture. Texas Livestock Marketing News. Austin, Texas, various issues, 1972-78.Google Scholar
Texas Department of Agriculture. Texas Prices Received and Paid by Farmers. Austin, Texas, various issues, 1972-78.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices: Annual Summary. ESCS Crop Reporting Board, June 1979.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock and Meat Situation. ESCS LMS-232, various issues, 1972-79.Google Scholar