Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:46:14.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Personal and Farm Characteristics upon Grain Marketing Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

James Sartwelle III
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University and Kansas State University, respectively
Daniel O'Brien
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University and Kansas State University, respectively
William Tierney Jr
Affiliation:
Kansas State University
Tim Eggers
Affiliation:
Specialist-Southwest Area with, Iowa State University
Get access

Abstract

A survey of Kansas, Texas, and Iowa agricultural producers was taken to examine the factors affecting their grain marketing practices. Sales indices models and models of qualitative choice are used to determine whether marketers' choices of cash market, forward contract, or futures and options oriented marketing practices are significantly affected by their personal and farm business characteristics. Results indicate that geographic location, farm size, grain enterprise specialization, farming experience, use of grain storage, and use of crop insurance have significant effects upon the respondents' choice of grain marketing practices.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asplund, N.M.Forster, D. L., and Stout, T. T.. “Farmers’ Use of Forward Contracting and Hedging.” Review of Futures Markets 8(1989):2437.Google Scholar
Batte, M.T., Schnitkey, G. D., and Jones, E.. “Sources, Uses, and Adequacy of Marketing Information for Commercial Midwestern Cash Grain Farmers.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 12(1990):187196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, A., Harris, T. R., Kvasnicka, W. G., and Veserat, G. M.. “Factors Influencing Rates of Adoption of Trichomoniasis Vaccine by Nevada Range Cattle Producers.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22(1998):279293.Google Scholar
Brorsen, B.W.Can Preharvest Marketing Strategies Be Used to Increase Income?Review of Agricultural Economics 20(1997):174190.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B.K. and Schroeder, T. K.. “Human Capital, Producer Education Programs, and the Adoption of Forward-Pricing Methods.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994):936947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1997.Google Scholar
Greene, W.HLIMPEP Version 7.0 User's Manual. Econometric Software, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
Griffiths, W.E.Hill, R.C., and Judge, G. G.. Learning and Practicing Econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993.Google Scholar
Hausman, J. and McFadden, D.. “Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model.” Econometrica 52(1984):12191240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, H.H. and Saupe, W. E.. “Determinants of Health Insurance Coverage for Farm Family Households: A Midwestern Study.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 9(1987):145154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makus, L.D., Lin, B.H., Carlson, J., and Krebill-Prather, R. “Factors Influencing Producer Decisions on the Use of Futures and Options in Commodity Marketing.” University of Idaho Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, A. E. Research Series 90-09, July 1990.Google Scholar
Musser, W.N., Patrick, G. F. and Eckman, D. T.. “Risk and Grain Marketing Behavior of Large Scale Farmers.” Review of Agricultural Economics 18(1996):6577.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D. L.. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. Fourth Edition. Irwin, McGraw-Hill, 1998.Google Scholar
Salant, P., and Dillman, D. A.. How to Conduct Your Own Survey. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994.Google Scholar
Sartwelle, J.D., O'Brien, D. M., and Barker, W. A.Producers’ Preferences for Market Outlook Information.” NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting and Market Risk Management Proceedings, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 165172. April 21-22, 1997.Google Scholar
Schnitkey, G., Batte, M., Jones, E., and Botomog-no, J.. “Information Preferences of Ohio Commercial Farmers: Implications for Extension.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(1992):487496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, T.C.Parcell, J. L., Kastens, T. L., and Dhuyvetter, K. C.. “Perceptions of Marketing Strategies: Producers versus Extension Economists.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23(1998):279293.Google Scholar
Shapiro, B.I. and Brorsen, B. W.. “Factors Affecting Farmers’ Hedging Decisions.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 10(1988):145153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaggs, R.K.Kirksey, R. E., and Harper, W. M.. “Determinants and Implications of Post-CRP Land Use Decisions.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(1994):299312.Google Scholar
Veall, M.R. and Zimmerman, K. F. “Goodness of Fit Measures in the Tobit Model.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 56(1994):485499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar