Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T14:28:58.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficient Cash and Hedged Enterprise Combinations in Feeder Calf Backgrounding Operations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Barry W. Bobst ,
Orlen C. Grunewald  and
J. T. Davis
Barry W. Bobst
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Orlen C. Grunewald
Affiliation:
Kansas State University
J. T. Davis
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Backgrounding of feeder cattle is a growing specialty operation in the so-called “Fescue Belt” grasslands of the South (Bradford et al.). Backgrounding is largely a seasonal enterprise, consisting of the purchase of weaned calves that are placed on pasture and supplemental feed for several months and then resold for placement in feedlots. Since feeder calf and feeder cattle prices are among the most volatile of all classes of cattle, backgrounders face considerable price risk (Russell and Franzmann). In principle, hedging could shift this risk, but there has been a question whether hedging can be worthwhile, given the additional costs and financial obligations involved.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , December 1982 , pp. 105 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blank, S. “Commodity Futures Price Theory for Semi-Storable Products.” A paper presented at the AAEA annual meeting, Clemson, South Carolina, July, 1981.Google Scholar
Bradford, G. A., Boling, J. A., Rutledge, S. R., and Moss, T. W.. “Comparing Management Systems for Beef Cattle Backgrounding: A Multidisciplinary Approach.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 10(1978):57–62.Google Scholar
Franzmann, J. R. “Simulated Results of Hedging Feeder Cattle with the Aid of Technical Tools of Analysis”, in Livestock Futures Research Symposium. Leuthold, R. M. and Dixon, P. (eds.), Chicago: Chicago Mercantile Exchange, 1980.Google Scholar
Grunewald, O. C. “A Risk Programming Analysis of the Role of Hedging in the Kentucky Feeder Cattle Industry.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Kentucky, 1980.Google Scholar
Leuthold, R. M., “The Price Performance on the Futures Market of a Nonstorable Commodity: Live Beef Cattle.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 56(1974):271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H.Portfolio Selection. New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
Martin, L. and Garcia, P., “The Price-Forecasting Performance of Futures Markets for Live Cattle and Hogs: A Disaggregated Analysis.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 63(1981):209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musser, W. N., Shurley, W. D. and Williams, F. W.. “An E-V Analysis of Beef Cattle Backgrounding Systems in Georgia.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 12(1980):37–42.Google Scholar
O'Bryan, S. L., Bobst, B. W..and Davis, J. T.. “Factors Affecting Efficiency of Feeder Cattle Hedging in Kentucky.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 9(1977):185–189.Google Scholar
Russell, J. R. and Franzmann, J. R.. “Oscillators as Decision Guides in Hedging Feeder Cattle: An Economic Evaluation.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 11(1979):83–88.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. F., Bradford, G. A..and Boling, J. A.. “Minimum Cost Feeding Systems for Backgrounding Beef Cattle in Central Kentucky.” Research Report No. 26, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 1976.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock and Meat Situation. Washington, D.C.: USDA, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock Meat Wool Market News. Washington, D.C.: USDA, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1978 Census of Agriculture, Vol. 1, Parts 4, 17, 42. (Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1981.Google Scholar