Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:28:37.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fertilizer Demand Functions for Five Crops in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Kisan R. Gunjal
Affiliation:
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University
Roland K. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii
Earl O. Heady
Affiliation:
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University
Get access

Extract

Fertilizer consumption by the U.S. agricultural sector has increased dramatically for several decades. Nitrogen fertilizer use increased 632 percent between 1952 and 1976. Phosphate and potash fertilizer use increased 138 and 229 percent, respectively, in the same period (USDA 1978). However, the upward trend in fertilizer use was temporarily interrupted during the early and mid-1970s as the real fertilizer price began to increase after many years of decline.

Higher levels of aggregate fertilizer consumption over the 1952–1976 period outweighed the decline in the real price of fertilizer as real dollar expenditures for fertilizer continued to rise. Our study includes an attempt to relate fertilizer use for different crops to relevant economic variables.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Griliches, Zvi.The Demand for Fertilizer: An Economic Interpretation of a Technical Change.J. Farm Econ. 40(Aug. 1958):591606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heady, Earl O. and Martin H. Yeh. “National and Regional Demand Functions for Fertilizer.J. Farm Econ. 41(May 1959):332–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibach, D. B. and Adams, J. R.. Fertilizer Use in the United States, by Crops and Areas, 1964 Estimates. USDA Statist. Bull. 408, 1967Google Scholar
Ibach, D. B.. Adams, J.R., and Box, E. I.. Commercial Fertilizer Used on Crops and Pasture in the United States—1959 Estimates. USDA Statist. Bull. 348,1964.Google Scholar
Nerlove, Marc.Distributed Lags and Estimation of Long-Run Supply and Demand Elasticities: Theoretical Considerations.J. FarmEcon. 40(May 1958):301–11.Google Scholar
Ray, Daryli E.An Econometric Simulation Model of United States Agriculture with Commodity Submodels.” Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, 1971.Google Scholar
Schatzer, Raymond Joe, Roberts, Roland K., Heady, Earl O., and Gunjal, Kisan R.. An Econometric Simulation Model to Estimate Input Stocks and Expenses for Several U.S. Agricultural Commodities. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, forthcoming CARD report.Google Scholar
Stoecker, Arthur L.A Quadratic Programming Model of United States Agriculture in 1980: Theory and Application.” Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, 1974.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices. AMS, Crop Reporting Board. Various April and September issues 1952-59.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Fertilizer Used on Crops and Pasture in the United States, 1954 Estimates. ARS Statist. Bull. 216,1957.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Cropping Practices: Corn, Cotton, Soybeans and Wheat, 1964-70. SRS-17, 1971.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics, 1977a.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Changes in Farm Production and Efficiency, 1977. ERS Statist. Bull. 581, 1977b.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Farm Income Statistics. ERS Statist. Bull. 576,1977c.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices Annual Summary. SRS Crop Reporting Board, Pr. 1-3(61) through Pr. 1-3(77), 1961-77.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Commercial Fertilizers. SRS Crop Reporting Board, SpCr 7(78), 1978 and previous issues.Google Scholar