Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:02:23.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Macroeconomic Factors and the Thoroughbred Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Peter Karungu ,
Michael Reed  and
Douglas Tvedt
Peter Karungu
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky Department of Economics, University of Witwatersrand University, Johannesburg, South Africa
Michael Reed
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Douglas Tvedt
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Get access

Abstract

A capitalization approach is used to estimate econometrically the effects of exchange rate, interest rate and tax law changes on thoroughbred yearling prices. The analysis found that exchange rate and tax law changes have significantly influenced yearling prices since the early 1980s. Another serious price-reducing event was the 1986 tax law change. Both of these factors have counteracted the positive impact of increased purse rates on yearling prices.

Keywords

exchange ratemacroeconomicstax lawspurse ratesthoroughbreds
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , July 1993 , pp. 165 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bessler, David A. “Relative Prices and Money: A Vector Autoregression on Brazilian Data.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 66(1984):25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Robert G. “Agricultural and Financial Market Interdependence in the Short-Run.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 6(1984): 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Robert G., and Richard Just, E.. “Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on U.S. Agriculture: A Dynamic Analysis. “ Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 63(1980): 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devados, S., and Meyers, William H. “Relative Prices and Money: Further Results of the United States.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 6(1984): 838–42.Google Scholar
Johnson, Paul R., Grennes, Thomas, and Thursby, Marie “Devaluation Foreign Trade Controls and Domestic Wheat Prices.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 59(1977): 619–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kost, William “Effects of Exchange Rate on Agricultural Trade.” Agr. Econ. Res. 28(1976): 99–106.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Robert G. “All About Purses. “The Thoroughbred Record. Aug. 1989, pp.886-889Google Scholar
Longmire, J., and Morey, A. “Strong Dollar Dampens Demand for U.S. Farm Exports.” Foreign Agricultural Economics Report No. 193, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C. (1983).Google Scholar
Newberry, James H. Jr., Legal Aspects of Horse Farm Operations, University of Kentucky College of Law, Continuing Legal Education Monograph Series. 1990.Google Scholar
Orden, David. “Agriculture, Trade, and Macroeconomics: The U.S. Case.” Journal of Policy Modelling 8 (1986): 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, Edward G., “The Exchange Rate and U.S. Agriculture.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 56 (1974): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Blood-Horse: A Weekly Publication of the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association, Lexington, KY.: Blood-Horse, Inc., various issues.Google Scholar
Thoroughbred Times, Lexington, Ky: Thoroughbred Publications, January 1990.Google Scholar