Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T04:46:34.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plant Nutrient Demand Functions for Tennessee with Prices of Jointly Applied Nutrients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Roland K. Roberts
Roland K. Roberts*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Tennessee
Get access

Abstract

Several studies have estimated plant nutrient demand functions for nitrogen, phosphate, and potash. All included own-price effects but excluded prices of jointly applied nutrients. In this study, nutrient demand functions, which include prices of all three nutrients, are estimated for Tennessee by seemingly unrelated regression. Results suggest that cross-price eflfects are important in determining plant nutrient demand, at least in the case of Tennessee, and that multicollinearity need not be a hindrance in all cases to including cross-price eflfects in plant nutrient demand models.

Keywords

fertilizerplant nutrientsinputsfactor demandelasticitiesmulticollinearity
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , December 1986 , pp. 107 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., and Welsch, R. E.. Regression Diagnostics, Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carman, H. F. “The Demand for Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potash Fertilizer Nutrients in the Western United States.” West. J. Agr. Econ., 4(1979):23–31.Google Scholar
Doll, J. P. and Orazem, F.. Production Economics: Theory with Practice. Columbus, Ohio: Grid Inc., 1978.Google Scholar
Gisser, M. Introduction to Price Theory. 2nd Edition, Scranton, Pennsylvania: International Textbook Company, 1966.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. “The Demand for Fertilizer: An Economic Interpretation of Technical Change.” J. Farm Econ., 40(1958):591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z.. “Distributed Lags, Disaggregation, and Regional Demand Functions for Fertilizer.” J. Farm Econ., 41(1959):90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunjal, K. R., Roberts, R. K., and Heady, E. O.. “Fertilizer Demand Functions for Five Crops in the United States.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 12,2(1980):111–116.Google Scholar
Gyawu, E. A., Jones, L. D., Debertin, D. L., and Pagoulatos, A.. An Econometric Analysis of the U. S. Fertilizer Industry. University of Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station, Agricultural Economics Research Report 39, 1984.Google Scholar
Heady, E. O. and Yeh, M. H.. “National and Regional Demand Functions for Fertilizer.” J. Farm Econ., 41(1959):332–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heady, E. O. and Yeh, M. H.. “Factors Related to the United States and Regional Demand for Fertilizer.” Commercial Fertilizer and Plant Food Industry. 100(March, 1960):32–38.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M. and Quandt, R. E.. Microeconomic Theory. 2nd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1971.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. Econometric Methods. 3nd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1984.Google Scholar
Leong, S. “Multicollinearity Revisited: A Comparison of Selected Diagnostic Tools for Agricultural Economic Research.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association; Orlando, Florida; February 3-5, 1986.Google Scholar
Miller, S. E., Capps, O. Jr. and Wells, G. J.. “Confidence Intervals for Elasticities and Flexibilities from Linear Equations.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 66,3(1984):392–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesek, J. T. and Heady, E. O.. “Surfaces, Isoquants, and Isoclines from Fertilization.” Chapter 15 in Heady, E. O. and Dillon, J. L.. Agricultural Production Functions. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Rausser, G. C. and Moriak, T. F.. “The Demand for Fertilizer, 1949-1964: An Analysis of the Coefficients from Periodic Cross Sections.” Agr. Econ. Res., 22(1970):45–56.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. K. and Heady, E. O.. “Fertilizer Demand Functions for Specific Nutrients Applied to Three Major U. S. Crops.” West. J. Agr. Econ., 7(1982):265–277.Google Scholar
Tennessee Department of Agriculture. Tennessee Agricultural Statistics: 1984 Annual Bulletin. Tennessee Crop Reporting Service, Bulletin T-21, 1984.Google Scholar
Tennessee Valley Authority. Fertilizer Summary Data. National Fertilizer Development Center; Muscle Shoals, Alabama, 1964–1984.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices: Annual Summary. Statistical Reporting Service, 1964–1984.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1965–1983.Google Scholar
White, K. J. “A General Computer Program for Econometric Methods: SHAZAM.” Econometrica, 46(1978):239–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar