Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T23:14:05.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Re-Evaluation of the Contribution of the Rural-To-Urban Labor Flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Russell H. Brannon  and
Kurt R. Anschel
Russell H. Brannon
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Kurt R. Anschel
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1954, W. Arthur Lewis published his well-known landmark article conceptualizing a two-sector model of a developing nation, and centered his analysis around the classical assumption of an unlimited supply of labor [12]. The two sectors in the model consisted of the non-capital-using subsistence sector, and the capitalist sector which used reproducible capital. Among the key features of the model was the gain in productivity to be derived from the transfer of labor from the labor-abundant subsistence sector to the more productive capital-using sector. Given an assumption of a negligible marginal productivity of labor in the subsistence sector, labor could be transferred at a very low opportunity cost and with very little required increase in wages. Cheap labor was viewed as a boon to development since it produced a “capitalist surplus” which could be reinvested in capitalist enterprise for continued growth. This capitalist surplus would continue to be reaped so long as there existed surplus labor in the subsistence sector to provide labor to the capitalist sector at a constant wage. The capitalist surplus was viewed as the key to the model since it was assumed that savings and investment were available primarily from profits and not from wages or rents.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , December 1971 , pp. 37 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Adams, Dale W., “Rural Migration and Agricultural Development in Colombia,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 527–539, July 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Brannon, Russell H., The Agricultural Development of Uruguary: The Problems of Government Policy, New York: Frederick A. Praeger Publishing Co., 1968.Google Scholar
3.Davis, Kingsley, “Population,” Technology and Development, pp. 35–36, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963.Google Scholar
4.Dovring, Folke, “Unemployment in Traditional Agriculture,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 163–173, Jan. 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Eicher, Carl, Zalla, Thomas, Kocher, James, and Winch, Fred, “Employment Generation in African Agriculture,” Mimeo. draft, Dept. of Agr. Econ., Michigan State University, March 17, 1970.Google Scholar
6.Flinn, William L., “The Process of Migration to a Shantytown in Bogota, Colombia,” Inter-American Economic Affairs, Vol. XXII, No. 2, pp. 77–88, Autumn 1968.Google Scholar
7.Harbison, Frederick H., “The Generation of Employment in Newly Developing Countries,” paper presented at Conference on Education, Employment, and Rural Development, Nairobi, Kenya, 1967.Google Scholar
8.Harris, John R. and Todaro, Michael P., “Migration, Unemployment, and Development: A Two Sector Analysis,” Am. Econ. Rev., Vol. LX, No. 1, pp. 126–142, March 1970.Google Scholar
9.Herrick, Bruce H., Urban Migration and Economic Development in Chile, Cambridge: the M.I.T. Press, 1965.Google Scholar
10.Johnston, Bruce F. and Mellow, John W., “The Role of Agriculture in Economic Development.” Am. Econ. Rev., Vol. LI, No. 4, pp. 566–593, Sept. 1961.Google Scholar
11.Jorgenson, Dale W., “The Development of a Dual Economy,” Econ. J., Vol. 71, No. 282, pp. 309–334, June 1961.Google Scholar
12.Lewis, W. Arthur, “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor,” Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. XXII, No. 2, pp. 139–191, May 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Nelson, Philip, “Migration, Real Income, and Information,” J. of Regional Sc., Vol 1, No. 2, pp. 43–74, Spring 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Ranis, Gustav and Fei, John C. H., “Innovation, Capital Accumulation, and Economic Development,” Am. Econ. Rev., Vol. LIII, No. 3, pp. 283–313, June 1963.Google Scholar
15.Raup, Philip M., “The Contribution of Land Reforms to Agricultural Development: An Analytical Frame-work,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. XII, No. 1, pp. 1–21, Oct. 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Reynolds, Lloyd G., “Wages and Employment in a Labor Surplus Economy,” Am. Econ. Rev., Vol. LV, No. 1, pp. 19–39, March 1965.Google Scholar
17.Rostow, Walter W., “Agriculture's Role in Economic Development,” Foreign Agr., Vol. 1, No. 35, pp. 3–5, Sept. 2, 1963.Google Scholar
18.Sabota, Gian S., “An Economic Analysis of Internal Migration in Brazil,” J. of Pol. Economy, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 218–245, March-April 1968.Google Scholar
19.Sewell, Grenville H., “Squatter Settlements in Turkey: Analysis of a Social, Political, and Economic Problem,” Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T., 1964.Google Scholar
20.Stevens, Robert D., “Elasticity of Food Consumption Associated with Changes in Income in Developing Countries,” Foreign Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 23, U.S. Dept. of Agr., Washington, D. C, 1965.Google Scholar
21.Thiesenhusen, William C, “Population Growth and Agricultural Employment in Latin America, with Some U.S. Comparisons,” Am. J. of Agr. Econ., Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 735–752, Nov. 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Todaro, Michael P., “A Model of Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries,” Am. Econ. Rev., Vol. LIX, No. 1, pp. 138–148, March 1969.Google Scholar
23.Turner, John C. “Uncontrolled Urban Settlement: Problems and Policies,” Development Digest, Vol. VII, No. 3, pp. 47–57, July 1969.Google Scholar
24.United Nations Economic and Social council, Report of the Population Commission, World Population Situation Report of the Secretary-General, E/4778 E/CN.9/231, Sept. 23, 1969.Google Scholar
25.United Nations, Economic Commission for Latin America, “Urbanization in Latin America—Results of a Field Survey of Living Conditions in an Urban Sector,” E/Cn 12/662, mimeo., March 13, 1963.Google Scholar
26.United Nations, Statistical Office of the United Nations, Demographic Yearbook 1957, pp. 153–154, New York: United Nations, 1958.Google Scholar
27.United Nations, Statistical Office of the United Nations, Demographie Yearbook 1968, pp. 92–93, New York: United Nations, 1969.Google Scholar
28.United Nations, “Urbanization Development Policies and Planning.” Internat. Soc. Dev. Rev., No. 1, New York: United Nations, 1968.Google Scholar