Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T08:15:11.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural Shifts in the Treatment of Intergovernmental Aid: The Case of Rural Roads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Steven C. Deller  and
Norman Walzer
Steven C. Deller
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Norman Walzer
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL
Get access

Abstract

The effects of structural shifts in the treatment of intergovernmental aid during the 1980s are tested using a sample of 1,929 rural counties with local road responsibilities. A dynamic model is used to test the hypothesis that local public officials treated intergovernmental aid differently after the Reagan/Bush policy of Fiscal Federalism was implemented. Empirical findings from the dynamic model are that Federal aid was much more stimulative at the end of the decade than in earlier years but the effects of state aid remained the same throughout the 1980s. These differences are attributed to a perception that Federal aid is less certain and more transitory than permanent.

Keywords

intergovernmental aidstimulative and substitutive effectstransitory and permanent effectsrural roads
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , December 1995 , pp. 522 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atash, F., “Fiscal Impacts of Economic Changes on the Revues and Expenditures of Rural Local Governments and Communities.” in Economic Productivity and Adaptability. University Park, PA: Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development. April, 1991.Google Scholar
Augstyniak, S., “Some Econometric Advantages of Panel Data.” in Five Thousand American Families-Patterns of Economic Progress. University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, vo1. 9. 1981.Google Scholar
Bahl, R. and Duncombe, W., “State and Local Government Finances: Was There a Structural Break in the Reagan Years?” Growth and Change. 19,4(1988):30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahl, R. and Sjoquist, D.L., “The State and Local Fiscal Outlook: What Have We Learned and Where Are We Headed?” National Tax Journal. 43,3(1990):321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumel, P.C., and Schornhorst, E., “Local Rural Roads and Bridges: Current and Future Problems and Alternatives.” Transportation Research Record. No. 898, 1983.Google Scholar
Benton, J.E., “The Effects of Changes in Federal Aid on State and Local Government Spending.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 22(Winter, 1992):71–82.Google Scholar
Braaten, K., “Rural Counties: The Challenges Ahead.” Intergovernmental Perspective. 17:1 (Winter, 1991):38–40.Google Scholar
Census of the Governments, 1982 & 1987. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Chicoine, D.L. and Walzer, N., Financing Rural Roads and Bridges in the Midwest. Washington, DC: Office of Transportation and Agricultural Marketing Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture. October 1984.Google Scholar
Chicoine, D.L., Walzer, N. and S.C. Deller, “Financing Rural Roads and Bridges: Issues and Trends.” in Profitability and Mobility in Rural America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. 1989a.Google Scholar
Chicoine, D.L., Walzer, N. and Deller, S.C., “Representative vs. Direct Democracy and Government Spending in a Median Voter Model.” Public Finance/Finances Publiques. 44:2(1989b):225–235.Google Scholar
City and County Data Book. 1988. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Cooper, T.W., and Kane, A., “Minor Rural Roads: Finance Trends and Issues.” Transportation Research Record. No. 813, 1981.Google Scholar
Courant, P.N., Gramlich, E.M., and Rubinfeld, D.. “The Stimulative Effect of Intergovernmental Grants, or Why Money Sticks Where It Hits.” eds. Meiszkowski, P. and Oakland, W., Fiscal Federalism and Grants-In-Aid. The Urban Institute. 1979.Google Scholar
Deller, S.C, Chicoine, D.L. and Walzer, N., “Economies of Scale and Scope in Rural Low Volume Roads.” Review of Economics and Statistics. August 1988.Google Scholar
Deller, S.C. and Halstead, J., Financing Local Roads and Bridges in the Northern New England States. Orono, Maine: Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin. October, 1991Google Scholar
Gakenheimer, R., “Infrastructure Shortfall: The Institutional Problems.” American Planning Association Journal. (Winter, 1989).Google Scholar
Gramlich, E.M., “Intergovernmental Grants: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” in The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism, ed. W.E. Oates. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. 1977.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. and Hausman, J.A., “Errors in Variables in Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics. 31(1986):93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, P.J., “Intergovernmental Grants and Grantor Government Own-Purpose Expenditures.” National Tax Journal. 42,4(1989):487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, P.J., “The Impact of Federal and State Grants on Local Government Spending: A Test of the Fiscal Illusion Hypothesis.” Public Finance Quarterly. 18,3(1990):313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, J.C and Busson, T., Managing Rural Infrastructure: State Assistance to Small and Rural Governments for Public Works. Lexington, Kentucky: Center for Agriculture and Rural Development. December, 1986.Google Scholar
Hewitt, D., “Fiscal Illusion from Grants and the Level of State and Federal Expenditures.” National Tax Journal. 39(1986):471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highway Statistics, (various years). Washington, DC: US Department ot Iransportation.Google Scholar
Huckins, L.E. and Carnevale, J.T., “Federal Grants-in-Aid: Theoretical Concerns, Design Issues, and Implementation Strategy.” in Research in Urban Economics. Vol. 7. JAI Press Inc. 1988.Google Scholar
Ladd, H.F., “State Assistance to Local Governments: Changes During the 1980s.” American Economic Review. 80,2(1990): 171–175.Google Scholar
O'Brien, J.P. and Shieh, Y., “Utility Functions and Fiscal Illusion from Grants.” National Tax Journal. 43,2(1990):201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, J.J., “A View from the Commission.” Intergovernmental Perspective. 17:1(Winter, 1991):2.Google Scholar
Stewart, M.D., “Counties in the Federal System: The Washington Connection.” Intergovernmental Perspective. 17:1 (Winter, 1991): 18–20.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.P., “Financing County Government: An Overview.” Intergovernmental Perspective. 17: 1(Winter, 1991):10–13.Google Scholar
Walzer, N. and Chicoine, D.L., Rural Roads and Bridges: A Dilemma for Local Officials. Washington, DC: Office of Transportation, U.S. Department of Agriculture. April 1989.Google Scholar
Walzer, N. and Deller, S.C., “Federal Aid and Local Transportation Infrastructure Spending: A Review of the 1980s.” Policy Studies Journal. 21:2(1993):309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, J.A., “Grants-in-Aid: The Analytics of Design and Response.” National Tax Journal. 24(1971): 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar