Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T05:39:25.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Water Resources Management: Policy Economics for an Era of Transitions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Leonard A. Shabman
Leonard A. Shabman*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Get access

Extract

Prior to the last decade, federal water-project construction programs dominated water policy. These programs continue, but at a reduced level of funding, and the nation now is denning a new agenda of water resources issues to include water quality management and water allocation. Economists engaged in studies of water resources policy, and who seek to influence the direction of policy through research, teaching, and extension will find these exciting times.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , July 1984 , pp. 53 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, B. and Hassler, W.. Clean Coal-Dirty Air. New Haven: 1981. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, G. The Essence of Decision. Boston: Little Brown. 1971.Google Scholar
Anderson, T., ed. Water Rights: Scarce Resource Allocation, Bureaucracy and the Environment. Cambridge: Ballinger. 1983.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. and Hill, P.. “The Role of Private Property in the History of American Agriculture,” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976):937–945.Google Scholar
Ashford, N., Ryan, C., and Caldart, C.. “Law and Science Policy in the Federal Regulation of Formaldehyde,” Science. 222(1983):894–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batie, S. Soil Erosion. Washington: The Conservation Foundation. 1983.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. Cost and Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1969.Google Scholar
Burness, H. S., Cummings, R. G., Gorman, W. D., and Lansford, R. R.. “U.S. Reclamation Policy and Indian Water Rights,” Nat. Res. J.. 20(1980):807–826.Google Scholar
Cochrane, W. “Some Non-Conformist Thoughts on Welfare Economics and Commodity Stabilization Policy,” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 62(1980):508–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Budget Office. Charging for Federal Services. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1983.Google Scholar
Crandall, R. “Has Reagan Dropped the Ball?” Regulation. September/October(1981): 15–18.Google Scholar
Crandall, R. and Lave, L.. The Scientific Basis of Health and Safety Regulation. Washington: Brookings Institution. 1981.Google Scholar
Davies, J. The Politics of Pollution. New York: Pegasus. 1970.Google Scholar
Eckstein, O. Water Resource Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1958.Google Scholar
Foster, D. “Planning for the Development of Economic Incentives under Institutional Constraints: The Role for Guided Incrementalism,” in Joeres, E. and David, M., eds., Buying a Better Environment: Cost Effective Regulation Through Permit Trading. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Freeman, A. “Technology Based Effluent Standards: The U.S. Case,” Water Res. Research. 16(1980):21–27.Google Scholar
Freeman, A. M. The Benefits of Environmental Improvement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1979.Google Scholar
Hanke, S. and Davis, R.. “The Role of User Fees and Congestion Tolls in the Management of Inland Waterways,” Water Res. Bull.. 10(1974):54–65.Google Scholar
Hart, S. “The Environmental Movement: Fulfillment of the Renaissance Prophecy?” Nat. Res. J., 20(1980):501–522.Google Scholar
Haveman, R. Water Resources Development and the Public Interest. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. H. A History of Federal Water Resources Programs, 1800-1960. Misc. Pub. 1233. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 1972.Google Scholar
Joeres, E. and David, M., eds. Buying a Better Environment: Cost Effective Regulation Through Permit Trading. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Kalt, J. and Zupan, M.. “Further Evidence on Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics,” Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Discussion Paper 979, August 1983.Google Scholar
Kelman, S. What Price Incentives?: Economists and the Environment. Boston: Auburn House. 1981.Google Scholar
Kneese, A. The Economics of Regional Water Quality Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Lindbloom, C. “Still Muddling, Not Yet Through,” Public Admin. Rev., 39(1979):517–526.Google Scholar
Lowi, T. The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: W. W. Norton. 1969.Google Scholar
Maass, A. Muddy Waters, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maass, A. “Public Investment Planning in the United States: Analysis and Critique,” Public Policy, (1970):211–243.Google Scholar
March, J. “Theories of Choice and Making Decisions,” Society, 141(1982):29–39.Google Scholar
Marshall, H. “Economic Efficiency Implications of Federal-Local Cost Sharing in Water Resource Development,” Water Res. Research, 6(1970):673–682.Google Scholar
McKean, R. Efficiency in Government Through Systems Analysis. New York: John Wiley. 1958.Google Scholar
Meltsner, A. Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1976.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. “The New Controversy about the Rationale of Economic Evaluation,” J. Econ. Issues, XVI(1982):29–48.Google Scholar
National Water Commission. Water Policies for the Future. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1975.Google Scholar
North, D. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton. 1981.Google Scholar
Pinchot, G. “The Birth of Conservation, ” Nash, R., ed. The American Environment. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. 1968.Google Scholar
Powledge, F. “Water: The Magnificent Liquid of Life.” National Wildlife, February/March (1984):7–9.Google Scholar
Randall, A. “Policy Science in the Land Grant Complex: A Perspective on Natural Resource Economics.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 14(1982):85–92.Google Scholar
Rhoads, S. “Economists and Policy Analysis,” Public Admin. Rev., 38(1978):112–120.Google Scholar
Ricci, P. and Molton, L.. “Risk and Benefit in Environmental Law.” Science. 214(1981):1096–1100.Google Scholar
Shabman, L. Decision Making in Water Resource Investment and the Potential of Multi-Objective Planning. Technical Report 42. Cornell University Water Resources Center, Ithaca, N.Y. 1972.Google Scholar
Shabman, L. “Non-Market Valuation and Public Policy: Historical Lessons and New Directions” in Allee, D. and Haimes, Y., eds. Multiobjective Analysis in Water Resources, New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1984.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. “On Predicting the Future of Administrative Law,” Regulation, May/June(1982):18–25.Google Scholar
Shultze, C. The Public Use of the Private Interest. Washington: Brookings Institution. 1977.Google Scholar
Steiner, P. “Public Expenditure Budgeting, ” in The Economics of Public Finance, Washington: Brookings Institution, 1974.Google Scholar
Wengert, N. “A Critical Review of the River Basin as a Focus for Resource Planning, Development and Management,” ed. North, R. et al. Unified River Basin Management. Minneapolis: American Water Resources Association. 1981:9–27.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. New York: Little Brown. 1979.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. “The Political Economy of Efficiency.” ed. Ranney, A.. Political Science and Public Policy. Chicago: Markham. 1968.Google Scholar