Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-01T22:40:16.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of irrigation, plant density and genotype on pollination, fertilization and seed development in spring field beans (Vicia faba L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. L. Stoddard
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Maris Lane, Trumpington, Cambridge, CB2 2LQ

Summary

Incidences of pollination and fertilization were determined and the development of seeds was monitored in spring beans over 2 years. Plant density was varied in the 1st year and irrigation in the 2nd. The incidences of pollination, fertilization and seed development were all independent of plant density. The proportion of ovules that developed as seeds was slightly enhanced in irrigated plots as losses from abortion and from lack of fertilization within fertilized ovaries were both reduced. Autofertility, or spontaneous self-pollination leading to fertilization, led to an increase in the overall incidence of fertilization. Three autofertile stocks were up to 11% more pollinated and fertilized than two partly autofertile ones which, in turn, were up to 20% more than two non-autofertile, long-podded stocks. A closed-flower population was 30% less fertilized than the long pods and was insufficiently autofertile to allow an adequate number of pods to set on the lower flowering nodes. Three stocks, one autofertile, one with terminal inflorescences (ti) and the third with both characters, were subject to particularly high losses of fertilized ovules from abortion, 27–35%, while few ovules, 12% or less, aborted in closed flowers and long pods. Failure of seeds to mature in long pods was associated primarily with the low proportion of ovules fertilized within fertilized flowers, rather than with abortion of the fertilized ovules.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bond, D. A., Lockwood, G., Jellis, G. J., Toynbeeclarke, G., Pope, M., Aubury, R. G. & Hall, J. A. (1983). Field beans: autofertility. Report of the Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge for 1982, pp. 5152.Google Scholar
Gates, P., Yarwood, J. N., Harris, N., Smith, M. L. & Boulter, E. (1981). Cellular changes in the pedicel and peduncle during flower abscission in Vicia faba. In Vicia faba: Physiology and Breeding (ed. Thompson, R.), pp. 299312. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, P., Smith, M. L., White, G. & Boulter, D. (1983). Reproductive physiology and yield stability in Vicia faba L. In Temperate Legumes: Physiology, Genetics, Modulation (ed. Davies, D. R. and Jones, D. G.), pp. 4354. London: Pitman Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1983). Self-incompatibility: phenomenology and physiology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 218, 371395.Google Scholar
Lawes, D. A. (1981). The field bean breeding programme at the Welsh Plant Breeding Station. Report of the Welsh Plant Breeding Station for 1980, pp. 175192.Google Scholar
Lord, E. M. & Heslop-Harrison, Y. (1984). Pollenstigma interaction in the Leguminosae: stigma organization and the breeding system in Vicia faba L. Annals of Botany 54, 827836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, J. & Duc, G. (1984). A design for testing some genotypex environment interactions. In Vicia faba: Agronomy, Physiology and Breeding (ed. Hebblethwaite, P. D., Dawkins, T. C. K., Heath, M. C. and Lockwood, G.), pp. 219224. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, M. H. (1977). Obligate autogamy in Vicia faba L. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 253256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, G. G. & Bond, D. A. (1983). The relationship between number of seeds and frequency of ovule fertilization in field beans (Vicia faba L.), Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, G. G., Bond, D. A. & Parker, M. L. (1983). Estimates of the frequency of fertilization in field beans (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 2533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, G. G., Duc, G. & Picard, J. (1984). The effect of environment, apex excision and flower removal on fertility components of faba beans (Vicia faba L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 64, 95103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, D. G. (1958). The nature of the breeding system in the field bean (V. faba L.) and its relationship to breeding for yield. Heredity 12, 113124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjodin, J. (1971). Induced morphological variation in Vicia faba L. Hereditas 67, 155180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. L. (1982). Factors affecting flower abscission in field beans (Vicia faba L. minor). Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham, U.K.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1980). Statistical Methods, 7th edn.Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Stoddard, F. L. (1985). Fertilization in Vicia faba L. in relation to breeding objectives. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
Stoddard, F. L. (1986 a). Pollination and fertilization in commercial crops of field beans (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 8997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddard, F. L. (1986 b). Floral viability and pollen tube growth in Vicia faba L. Journal of Plant Physiology 123, 249262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddard, F. L. (1986 c). Autofertility and bee visitation in contrasting genotypes of winter and spring faba beans (Vicia faba L.). Zeilschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddard, F. L. (1986 d). Pollination, fertilization and seed development in winter stocks of faba beans (Vicia faba L.). Euphytica 35 (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar