Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T13:21:38.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lactation in heifers induced by oestrogen implants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. T. Day
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge
J. Hammond
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge

Extract

Average lactation curves have been prepared from selected animals in a group of heifers treated for 60 or 100 days with stilboestrol or hexoestrol tablet implants. A treatment period of 100 days appears to give poorer results than one of 60 days. The optimum duration, on the average, is probably about 75 days, but seems to depend upon the way lactation develops—which bears no obvious relationship to the amount of oestrogen absorbed.

A rise in yield follows tablet removal whether this is done while the yield is still rising or after it has begun to decline. Yield in an induced lactation may fall very far short of the animal's inherent capacity, but comparison between induced lactations and those at subsequent calvings shows that it may very nearly approach what would be a normal yield.

A heifer which was treated twice did rather less well in her second induced lactation.

Breeding histories of a number of implanted heifers are outlined. They were all animals which had failed previously to get in calf. 5–10% (without further treatment) did not return to an ovulatory cycle. About 70% of anatomically normal heifers got in calf, the service rate being about 2·6. A rather high incidence of abortions may be a feature of a recovery period from treatment, but may have been due to selection of animals with such a tendency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Folley, S. J. & Malpress, F. H. (1944). J. Endocrinol. 4, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr & Day, F. T. (1944). J. Endocrinol. 4, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. & Sanders, H. G. (1923). J. Agric. Sci. 13, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, A. S. & Glover, R. E. (1944). J. Endocrinol. 4, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. G. (1927). J. Agric. Sci. 17, 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, S. M. & Stanley, A. J. (1940). Anat. Rec. 78 (Suppl.), 142.Google Scholar