Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T03:07:11.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-weaning growth performance, carcass characteristics and preliminary heritability estimates for some carcass traits of two types of Sudan Desert sheep on intensive feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. I. A. El Karim  and
J. B. Owen
A. I. A. El Karim
Affiliation:
Centre for Arid Zone Studies, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd
J. B. Owen
Affiliation:
Centre for Arid Zone Studies, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Twenty-five male Shugor, 25 female Shugor, 25 male Watish and 25 female Watish lambs, individually fed for 57 days, were used to study post-weaning growth performance and carcass composition of these breed types when subjected to a period of intensive feeding.

Means and standard error of means of daily gain on experiment were 191·0±5·81, 166·0±5·81, 150·0±5·81 and 134·0±5·81 g for Shugor males, Watish males, Shugor females and Watish females, respectively. The means and S.E. for feed conversion ratio (FCR) were 5·79±0·190, 7·30±0·190, 7·47±0·190 and 8·00±0·190 in the same order. Shugor and male lambs had better gain (P < 0·001) and FCR (P < 0·01)than Watish and female lambs respectively.

Shugor had heavier slaughter weight and cold carcass weight than Watish (P < 0·01). Males were superior to females in slaughter weight, carcass weight and dressing percentage (P < 0·01). No difference was detected in lean, fat or bone percentage between breed type or sex (P < 0·05). Males had larger muscle area (P < 0·001) than females. On the other hand, females had more percentage kidney knob and channel fat (P < 0·001) and thicker fat depth (P <0·01) than males. Shugor were superior (P < 0·01) in fat depth to Watish.

Percentage non-carcass components showed that females had more percentage omental and mesenteric fat (P < 0·001) and percentage full stomach (P < 0·01). Breed type and sex showed significant effect (P < 0·001) on percentage liver.

In linear measurements, Shugor had greater carcass length and femur length (P < 0·01). Males had bigger circumference of buttocks and chest depth (P < 0·001).

For carcass joints as a percentage of side weight, the only clear effect of breed type was on percentage loin (P < 0·05). Males had bigger percentage middle neck (P < 0·001) and shoulder and percentage scrag (P < 0·01) than females, whereas females had higher percentage loin and chump.

Heritability estimates of some carcass traits, admittedly based on limited numbers, ranged from 0·32 (S.E. 0·183) for leg to 0·18 (S.E. 0·180) for loin weights. Linear carcass measurements showed low heritability of around 0·10 (S.E. 0·160).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 109 , Issue 3 , December 1987 , pp. 531 - 538
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bichard, M. & Yalcin, B. C. (1964). Crossbred sheep production. III. Selection for growth and carcass attributes in the second cross lamb. Animal Production 6, 179–187.Google Scholar
Botkin, M. P., Field, R. A., Riley, M. L., Nolan, J. C. & Roehrkrasse, G. P. (1969). Heritability of carcass traits in lambs. Journal of Animal Science 29, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, J. C. & Hendy, C. R. C. (1972). A study of retail requirements and genetic parameters of carcass quality in Polled Dorset Horn Sheep. Animal Production 14, 189–198.Google Scholar
Bowman, J. C, Marshall, J. E. & Broadbent, J. S. (1968). Genetic parameters and carcass quality in Down cross sheep. Animal Production 10, 183–191.Google Scholar
Bradford, G. E. & Spurlock, G. M. (1972). Selection for meat production in sheep. Results of progeny test. Journal of Animal Science 34, 737–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W., Francombe, M. A. & Dransfield, E. (1984). Carcass and meat quality of ram and ewe lambs. Animal Production 39, 107–113.Google Scholar
Cotterill, P. P. & Roberts, E. M. (1976). Preliminary heritability estimate of some lamb carcass traits. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 11, 53–56.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A., Harrington, G. & Smith, R. J. (1972). Tissue separation to assess beef and lamb variations. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 1972, pp. 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Hag, M. G. & Hamad, A. F. (1983). Sudan desert sheep performance on different levels of agro-industrial by-products supplemented with urea. World Review of Animal Production 19 (4), 21–28.Google Scholar
El Karim, A. I. A. (1980). Effect of docking on growth and carcass characteristics of Dubasi Desert sheep. Tropical Animal Production 5, 15–17.Google Scholar
Fourie, P. D., Kirton, A. H. & Jurry, K. E. (1970). Effect of breed and sex on the growth and carcass composition of the Southdown and Romney and their crosses. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 753–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaili, E. S. E. (1977). Evaluation of body composition of male Sudan sheep. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 54 (2), 127–133.Google Scholar
Gaili, E. S. E. (1979). Effect of breed-type on carcass weight and composition of sheep. Tropical Animal Health and Production 11, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guma, A. Y. (1980). Carcass study of Sudanese Desert Sheep. M. V.Sc. thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. (1977). Least-squares analysis with unequal subclass numbers – Users' guide for LSML 76. Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Hassan, M. H. & Mukhtar, A. M. S. (1970). Digestibility trials and feedlot performance of Desert sheep. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 47 (4), 325–330.Google Scholar
Hervé, M. P. (1978). The carcass characteristics of Welsh Mountain lambs as influenced by bodyweight, sire and feeding level. Ph.D. thesis, University College of North Wales, Bangor.Google Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Clarke, J. N. & Hickey, S. M. (1982). A comparison of the composition and carcass quality of Kelly and Russian castrate, ram, wether and ewe lambs. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 42, 117–118.Google Scholar
Lohse, C. L. (1973). Influence of sex on muscle growth in Merino sheep. Growth 3, 177–187.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. & StTaylor, C. S. (1976). Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Animal Production 23, 281–293.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission (1975). Instructions for the assessment, photography, retail cutting and tissue separation of lamb carcasses from the Sheep Breed Evaluation Scheme. M.L.C. Mimeograph, 27/6/75.Google Scholar
Murray, D. M. & Slezacek, O (1978). The effect of varying periods of maintenance of live weight on some body components of sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 12, 237.Google Scholar
Osman, A. H. & El Shafie, S. A. & Mukhtar, A. M. (1968). Carcass characteristics of Sudan Desert Sheep. Sudan Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 8, 115–119.Google Scholar
Osman, A. H., Shafie, S. A. & Khattab, G. H. (1970). Carcass composition of fattened rams and wethers of Sudan Desert Sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, J. H. D. & Hinks, C. E. (1967). An investigation of the carcass quality of lambs and hoggets with particular reference to the cold storage of home-bred lambs. University of Newcastle, Department of Agriculture Marketing Report No. 7.Google Scholar
Suliman, A. H. & El Amin, F. M. (1980). Feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of Sudan Desert sheep under irrigated Gezira area. East African Agriculture and Forestry Journal 45 (3), 210–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suliman, A. G., El Amin, F. M. & Osman, A. H. (1978). Reproductive performance of Sudan indigenous sheep under irrigated Gezira conditions. World Review of Animal Production 14 4–8.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. S., Mason, M. A. & McClelland, T. H. (1980). Breed and sex difference in muscle distribution in equally mature sheep. Animal Production 30, 125–133.Google Scholar
Wood, J. D., MacFie, H. J. H., Pomeroy, R. W. & Twinn, D. J. (1980). Carcass composition in four sheep breeds: the importance of type of breed and stage of maturity. Animal Production 30, 135–152.Google Scholar