Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T12:30:43.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protein studies on maize silage as a basal ration for dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. H. Phipps
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RO2 9AT
R. F. Weller
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RO2 9AT
T. Smith
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RO2 9AT
Rosemary J. Fulford
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RO2 9AT

Summary

In Expt 1 40 lactating British Friesians, 20 cows and 20 heifers, were used to study the effect of crude protein (CP) content of the whole ration on milk yield, milk composition and live-weight change when maize silage was fed as the basal ration. There were four treatments with five cows and five heifers on each. During lactation weeks 4–12 the cows on treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4 all received 7 kg maize silage dry matter (D.m.) plus 8 kg D.m./day of a concentrate containing either 14, 18, 22 or 24% CP, respectively; heifers received 1 kg/day less of both silage and concentrate. This produced whole-ration CP contents of 11·7, 13·9, 16.·0 and 17·1%. In the subsequent lactation weeks 13–20 silage feeding was increased to 9 kg D.m./cow/day and concentrate feeding decreased to 5 kg D.m./cow/day. Heifers again received 1 kg/day less of both silage and concentrate. This decreased whole-ration CP contents to 10·5, 11·7, 12·9 and 13·4%.

During lactation weeks 4–12 and 13–20, with the exception of milk fat content in weeks 13–20, there were significant linear effects of whole-ration CP content on milk yield, milk fat, protein, lactose and total solids. There were no significant curvilinear relationships. Thus, despite the fact that the highest numerical values were generally recorded for the animals on treatment 3, the results indicate that a whole-ration CP content of at least 17·1 and 13·4% are required in early and mid-lactation respectively.

In Expt 2 the loss of D.m., acid-detergent fibre and nitrogen from maize silage suspended in nylon bags in the rumen was measured. Compared with feeding either a low or high protein supplement, losses were greater for silage fed alone. If it is accepted that nitrogen loss can be approximated to protein degradability, then the value for maize silage was between 0·6 and 0·7. Using the same technique in Expt 3, comparable nitrogen losses for fish meal, decorticated groundnut meal and soya-bean meal were 0·3, 0·9 and 0·9, respectively, after 24 h incubation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. & Bines, J. A. (1974). Meeting the protein requirements of the dairy cow. Proceedings British Society of Animal Production 3, 5967.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. & Oldham, J. D. (1977). Protein quantity and quality for the U.K. dairy cow. In Nutrition and the Climatic Environment (ed. Haresign, W., Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 123153. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Tuck, V. J., Smith, T. & Johnson, V.W. (1969). Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. VII. Observations on the effect of the energy intake on the utilization of protein in growth and in lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E., Retter, W. C., Watson, J. N. & Zewdie, E. (1977). Silage and milk production: a comparison between four rates of groundnut cake supplementation of silage of high digestibility. Journal of the British Grassland Society 32, 4348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. W. & Park, R. L. (1973). Protein requirements for cows fed high concentrate rations. Journal of Dairy Science 56, 390394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. (1977). The effect of protein content on the response of lactating cows to level of concentrate feeding. Animal Production 25, 181191.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. (1979). The effect of protein content of the supplement for dairy cows with access ad libitum to high digestibility wilted grass silage. Animal Production 28, 183191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieve, D. G., MacLeod, G. K. & Stone, J. B. (1974). Effect of diet protein percent for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 57, 633.Google Scholar
Huber, J. T. (1975). Protein and non-protein nitrogen utilization in practical dairy rations. Journal of Animal Science 41, 954961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. T. & Santana, O. P. (1972). Ammonia treated corn silage for dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 489493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. T. & Thomas, J. W. (1971). Urea treated corn silage in low protein rations. Journal of Dairy Science 54, 224230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathers, J. C., Horton, C. M. & Miller, E. L. (1977). Rate and extent of protein degradation in the rumen. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 37A.Google ScholarPubMed
Mehrez, A. Z. & Ørskov, E. R. (1977). A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 455463.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. J., Blaxter, H. D. & Beardon, B. J. (1976). Corn silage supplementation for maximum intake and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 59, 19151922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1971). Recommended Dietary Allowances. 8th Edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D., Broster, W. H., Napper, D. J. & Siviter, J. W. (1979). The effect of low-protein ration on milk yield and plasma metabolites in Friesian heifers during early lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 149162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. & Mehrez, A. Z. (1977). Estimation of extent of protein degradation from basal feeds in the rumen of sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 78A.Google ScholarPubMed
Phipps, R. H. (1978). Utilization of maize silage for milk production. In Forage Maize, pp. 263295. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H. & Cramp, D. G. (1976). The supplementation of maize silage for an autumn calving dairy herd. Animal Production 23, 191196.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H. & Cramp, D. G. (1977). The use of maize silage and a non-protein nitrogen additive for autumn calving cows. Journal of the British Grassland Society 33, 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roffler, R. E., Satter, L. D., Hardie, A. R. & Tyler, W. J. (1978). Influence of dietary protein concentration on milk production by dairy cows during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 61, 14221428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowland, S. J. (1946). The problem of low solids-notfat. Dairy Industries 11, 656664.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Balch, C. C., Miller, E. L., Ørskov, E. R. & Smith, R. H. (1977). Calculation of the N requirement for ruminants from nitrogen metabolism studies. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, pp. 126129. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. & Mohamed, O. E. (1977). Effect of degradation in the rumen on dietary protein entering the ruminant duodenum. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 153A.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, T. (1978). The utilization of poor quality roughages by yearling dairy heifers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Sparrow, R. C., Hemken, R. W., Jacobson, R., Button, F. S. & Enlow, C. M. (1973). Three protein percents on nitrogen balance, body weight change, milk production and composition of lactating cows during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 56, 664.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. W. (1971). Protein requirements of milking cows. Journal of Dairy Science 54, 16291636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed