Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T00:24:19.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of growing steers to monensin sodium supplementation and implantation with trenbolone acetate and hexoestrol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. Galbraith
Affiliation:
Division of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen
G. F. M. Paterson
Affiliation:
Division of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen

Extract

Current means of improving the efficiency of beef production in the United Kingdom include the use of hormonal anabolic compounds and the feed additive monensin sodium (monensin, ‘Romensin’, Elanco). Results from studies conducted mainly in the United States have shown that monensin may improve food conversion efficiency (e.g. Broome, 1980) which occurs as a result of variable reductions in food intake with or without increases in growth rate. These effects have been associated with alterations in the production of volatile fatty acids and methane in the rumen. Other studies have suggested that protein metabolism may also be affected (e.g. Pendlum, Boling & Bradley, 1980).

Type
Short Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broome, A. W. J. (1980). Mechanisms of action of growth-promoting agents in ruminant animals. In Growth of Animals (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 189205. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. (1980a). Response of sheep and cattle to hormonal anabolic compounds. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Veterinary Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics (ed. Yoxall, A. T.). Amsterdam: Elsevier (in the Press).Google Scholar
Galbbaith, H. (1980b). The effect of trenbolone acetate on growth, blood hormones and metabolites and nitrogen balance of beef heifers. Animal Production 30, 389394.Google Scholar
Galbbaith, H. & Dempster, D. G. (1979). Effect of hexoestrol on the response of finishing steers to treatment with trenbolone acetate. The Veterinary Record 105, 283284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, H., Dempster, D. G. & Miller, T. B. (1978). A note on the effect of castration on the growth performance and concentrations of some blood metabolites and hormones in British Friesian male cattle. Animal Production 26, 339342.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. & Geraghty, K. J. (1978). Effect of dietary energy intake and implantation with trenbolone acetate and hexoestrol on the growth performance and blood metabolites and hormones of British Friesian steers. Animal Production 26, 361 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. & Watson, H. B. (1978). Performance, blood and car case characteristics of finishing steers treated with trenbolone acetate and hexoestrol. The Veterinary Record 103, 2830.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z. & Ilan, D. (1979). Monensin supplementation of young Israeli Friesian male cattle. Animal Production 29, 305310.Google Scholar
Pendlum, L. C., Boling, J. A. & Bradley, N. W. (1980). Nitrogen sources and monensin levels for growing steers fed corn silage. Journal of Animal Science 50, 2934.Google Scholar
Roche, J. F. (1980). The use of growth promoters in beef cattle. In The Use, Residues and Toxicology of Growth Promoters, pp. 112. Ireland: An Foras Taluntais.Google Scholar
Trenkle, A. & Burroughs, W. (1978). Feeding Rumensin in combination with Synovex-H or Ralgro implants in feedlot heifers. Leaflet R 268. Iowa: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Utley, P. R., Newton, G. L., Ritter, R. J. & McCormick, W. C. (1976). Effect of feeding monensin in combination with zeranol and testoateroneestradiol implants for growing and finishing heifers. Journal of Animal Science 42, 754760.Google Scholar