Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T19:55:32.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some effects of planting density and variety on the relationship between tuber size and tuber dry-matter percentage in potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. C. E. Wurr
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, U.C.W. Aberystwyth

Summary

Three experiments are reported which investigated the effects of planting density and variety on the relationship between tuber dry-matter percentage and tuber size. In the first experiment dry-matter determinations were made on samples of tubers less than 3·8 cm and greater than 3·8 cm from different planting densities obtained at eight fortnightly harvests. Standard analysis of variance was used for each harvest date and apart from Maris Piper giving consistently higher dry-matter percentages than Pentland Crown for the same tuber sizes, effects were small and difficult to interpret. The reasons for the problems in interpretation, which were mainly due to differences in tuber size distribution, are discussed.

In the second and third experiments the effects of tuber-size distribution were removed by regression analyses of tuber dry-matter percentage on tuber size in definable grades and curves were fitted to the data. These curves revealed that tuber dry-matter percentage tends to show a quadratic response to increasing tuber size and is affected by variety and stem density. The significance of these results is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bleasdale, J. K. A. (1965). Relationship between set characters and yield in maincrop potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 64, 361–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleasdale, J. K. A. & Thompson, R. (1969). Some effects of plant spacing on potato quality. European Potato Journal 12, 173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynne, M. D. & Jackson, V. G. (1919). The distribution of dry matter and nitrogen in the potato tuber. Variety King Edward. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 9, 237–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreusler, & Werner, H. (1876) in Der Kartoffelbau, by Berlin, H. Werner, (cited by Glynne & Jackson, 1919).Google Scholar
Mica, B. (1969). The distribution of dry matter, starch and amylose in the potato tuber. Rostlinna vyroba 15, 449–53. (Abstract in Field Crop Abstracts 23, 531.)Google Scholar
Murphy, H. J. & Goven, M. J. (1959). Factors affecting the specific gravity of the white potato in Maine. Bulletin Maine Agricultural Experimental Station, No. 583.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1974). Some effects of seed size and spacing on the yield and grading of two maincrop potato varieties. 2. Bulking rate. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 47–52.Google Scholar