Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-h9cmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:42:35.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The transpiration of corn*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. A. Al-Nakshabandi  and
H. N. Ismail
G. A. Al-Nakshabandi
Affiliation:
College of Agriculture, Riyadh University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
H. N. Ismail
Affiliation:
College of Agriculture, Riyadh University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The actual transpiration of corn (Zea mays L.) was determined by hydraulic lysimeters, by the inflow-outflow method and by use of a neutrone probe. Two irrigation treatments were used; wet and dry. Under the wet treatment, 740, 858, and 743 mm of irrigation water was used during the seasons 1968, 1969, and 1970 respectively. Under the dry treatment, amount of irrigation water used was 560, 627, and 565 mm during the seasons 1968, 1969 and 1970, respectively. Ratios of actual transpiration (Et) to Penman's estimate of potential evaporation (Eo), evaporation from a Class-B pan (EpB), global radiation (Rg) and net radiation (Rn) were calculated. Values of Et measured by the different methods are in good agreement. Seasonal averages of Et, were 6·2 and 4·9 mm/day under wet and dry treatments, respectively. The Et/Eo, Et/EpB, Et/Rg and Et/Rn ratios increased with leaf area index (L.A.I.) and reached their maximum values when L.A.I, reached its maximum value of 1·03 under wet and 0·92 under dry treatment. The empirical coefficient (f = Et/Eo) under wet treatments was found to be higher than that given by Penman for short grasses and about the same as that obtained by Boumans et al. (1963) for golden-gram (Phaseolus aureus) in Iraq for the months August and September. The empirical coefficient Kb in the Blaney–Criddle formula was greater than the value given by Blaney and Criddle for an arid climate, and less than the value obtained by Boumans et al. for golden-gram in Iraq. It was further found that water use efficiency for grain production was greater under dry than under wet treatments.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , December 1972 , pp. 501 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaney, H. F. & Criddle, W. D. (1950). Determining water requirements in irrigated areas from climatologioal and irrigation data. U.S. Dep. Agric. Soil Conserv. Serv. Tech. Pub. 96.Google Scholar
Boumans, J. H., Hulsbes, W. C., Lindenbergh, H. L. J. & Sluis, P. M. van der (1963). Reclamation of salt affected soil in Iraq. Int. Inst. Ld Reclam. Improv. Pub. no. 11.Google Scholar
Dagg, M. (1967). Hydraulic lysimeter for evapotranspiration measurements. Annex II. Coordinated research programme on the application of radiation techniques to water use efficiency studies. Int. Atomic Energy Agency Manual.Google Scholar
Denmead, O. T. & Shaw, R. H. (1959). Evapotranspiration in relation to development of the corn crop. Agron J. 51, 725–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doss, B. D., Bennett, O. L. & Ashley, D. A. (1962). Evaporation by irrigated corn. Agron. J. 54, 497–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritschen, L. J. & van Bavel, C. H. M. (1964). Energy balance as affected by height and maturity of sudangrass. Agron. J. 56, 201–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, D. M. & Hanks, R. J. (1967). Plant factors affecting evapotranspiration. In Irrigation of Agricultural Lands. Editors: Hagan, Haiseand Edminister. Am. Soc. Agron. Monograph, no. 11.Google Scholar
Graham, W. G. & King, K. M. (1961). Fraction of net radiation utilized in evapotranspiration from a corn crop. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 25, 158–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, R. J., Gardner, H. R. & Fairbourne, M. L. (1968). Evaporation of water from soils as influenced by drying with wind or radiation. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 31, 593–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, E. R., Glasser, A. H. & Satterwhite, L. E. (1957). Some aspects of the relationship of soil, plant, and meteorological factors to evapotranspiration. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 21, 464–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, J. S. G. (1965). Tables for the rapid computation of the Penman estimate of evaporation. E. afr. agric. For. J., Vol. 30, 286–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1956). Evaporation: An introductory survey. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 4, 9–29.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. T. (1971). Dryland evaporative flux in a subhumid climate: I. Micrometeorological influences. Agron. J. 63, 51–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, J. T. & Burnett, E. (1971). Dryland evaporative flux in subhumid climate: II. Plant influence. Agron. J. 63, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, C. B. & Lemon, E. R. (1962). Radiant energy utilized in evapotranspiration. Agron. J. 54, 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Bavel, C. H. M. & Harris, D. G. (1962). Evapotranspiration from Bermudagrass and corn at Raleigh, North Carolina. Agron. J. 54, 319–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viets, F. G. (1962). Fertilizers and the efficient use of water. Adv. Agron. 14, 223–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar