Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:12:30.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The yield response of oilseed rape to plant population density

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2015

S. E. ROQUES
Affiliation:
ADAS Boxworth, Boxworth, Cambridge CB234NN, UK
P. M. BERRY*
Affiliation:
ADAS High Mowthorpe, Duggleby, Malton, North Yorkshire YO178BP, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: pete.berry@adas.co.uk

Summary

Eight winter oilseed rape and two spring oilseed rape field experiments were performed in the UK in harvest years 2009–12. Each experiment consisted of at least one hybrid and one open-pollinated variety grown at five seed rates from 10 or 20 seeds/m2 to 160 or 200 seeds/m2. Linear plus exponential curves were used to describe the yield response to seed rate and to calculate economically optimal seed rates. Plant counts were then used to derive optimal plant population densities. These ranged from <10 to 39 plants/m2 for six winter oilseed rape experiments between 73 and >155 plants/m2 in two winter oilseed rape experiments with severe spring droughts, and from 47 to 65 plants/m2 for spring oilseed rape. Optimal plant population densities were lower for hybrid than for open-pollinated varieties, due to a combination of the higher cost of hybrid seed and, for some experimental sites, hybrid varieties compensating better for low plant populations. Across all sites, sowing winter oilseed rape at 30 seeds/m2 rather than common commercial rates of 70 seeds/m2 for hybrids and 100 seeds/m2 for open-pollinated varieties would have increased average gross margin by £29/ha. Sowing spring oilseed rape at 70 seeds/m2 rather than commonly used rates of 120 or 150 seeds/m2 would have increased average gross margin by £64/ha.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, N. S., Rasmussen, J. & Jørgensen, R. B. (2010). You reap what you sow–or do you? – volunteers in organic row-sown and broadcast-sown oilseed rape fields. European Journal of Agronomy 32, 121126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angadi, S. V., Cutforth, H. W., McConkey, B. G. & Gan, Y. (2003). Yield adjustment by canola grown at different plant populations under semiarid conditions. Crop Science 43, 13581366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon (2000). Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops, 7th edn, MAFF (now DEFRA) Reference Book 209. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Anon (2011). HGCA Recommended List Winter Oilseed Rape Trials Protocol 2011/12. Stoneleigh, UK: AHDB-HGCA.Google Scholar
Anon (2012). HGCA Descriptive List Spring Oilseed Rape 2012. Stoneleigh, UK: AHDB-HGCA.Google Scholar
Berry, P. M. & Spink, J. H. (2006). A physiological analysis of oilseed rape yields: past and future. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 381392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, S. A., Malhi, S. S., Ulrich, D., Lafond, G. P., Kutcher, H. R. & Johnston, A. M. (2007). Seeding rate, fertilizer level and disease management effects on hybrid versus open pollinated canola (Brassica napus L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 87, 255266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, J. V. & Drabble, J. C. (1984). Effect of row spacing and seeding rate on rapeseed yield in northwest Alberta. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 64, 10111013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, D. G. & De Pauw, R. M. (1980). Effect of seeding rate on growth and yield of three spring wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research 3, 289301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, M. J., Pinyosinwat, A. & Ellis, R. H. (2002). Responses of wheat grain yield and quality to seed rate. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 138, 317331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, S. & Claupein, W. (2008). Emergence and establishment of volunteer oilseed rape in spring and winter crops. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 21 (Sp Iss), 193198.Google Scholar
Hanson, B. K., Johnson, B. L., Henson, R. A. & Riveland, N. R. (2008). Seeding rate, seeding depth, and cultivar influence on spring canola performance in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 100, 13391346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiliç, H. & Gürsoy, S. (2010). Effect of seeding rate on yield and yield components of durum wheat cultivars in cotton-wheat cropping system. Scientific Research and Essays 5, 20782084.Google Scholar
Lääniste, P., Joõudu, J., Eremeev, V. & Mäeorg, E. (2008). Effect of sowing date and increasing sowing rates on plant density and yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) under Nordic climate conditions. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B: Soil and Plant Science 58, 330335.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D., Egli, D. B. & TeKrony, D. M. (2008). Soybean response to plant population at early and late planting dates in the Mid-South. Agronomy Journal 100, 971976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loss, S. P., Siddique, K. H. M., Jettner, R. & Martin, L. D. (1998). Responses of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to sowing rate in south-western Australia I. Seed yield and economic optimum plant density. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 989998.Google Scholar
Lunn, G. D., Spink, J. H., Stokes, D. T., Wade, A., Clare, R. W. & Scott, R. K. (2001). Canopy Management in Winter Oilseed Rape. HGCA Project Report No. OS49. London, UK: HGCA.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J., Berry, K., Payne, R. W., Simpson, E., Sweet, J. B., Champion, G. T., May, M. J., Wightman, P., Walker, K. & Lainsbury, M. (2005). Persistence of seeds from crops of conventional and herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272, 19091915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendham, N. J. & Salisbury, P. A. (1995). Physiology: crop development, growth and yield. In Brassica Oilseeds: Production and Utilization (Eds Kimber, D. S. & McGregor, D. I.), pp. 1164. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Nix, J. (2011). John Nix Farm Management Pocketbook, 42nd edn 2012, Melton Mowbray, UK: Agro Business Consultants Ltd.Google Scholar
Ozer, H. (2003). The effect of plant population densities on growth, yield and yield components of two spring rapeseed cultivars. Plant, Soil and Environment 49, 422426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahin, Y. & Valiollah, R. (2009). Effects of row spacing and seeding rates on some agronomical traits of spring canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Journal of Central European Agriculture 10, 115122.Google Scholar
Shirtliffe, S. J. & Johnston, A. M. (2002). Yield-density relationships and optimum plant populations in two cultivars of solid-seeded dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82, 521529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddique, K. H. M., Loss, S. P., Regan, K. L. & Pritchard, D. L. (1998). Adaptation of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) to short season Mediterranean-type environments: response to sowing rates. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 10571066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sincik, M., Goksoy, A. T. & Turan, Z. M. (2010). Influence of sowing properties on winter oilseed rape in a sub-humid Mediterranean environment. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 38, 171175.Google Scholar
Spink, J. H., Semere, T., Sparkes, D. L., Whaley, J. M., Foulkes, M. J., Clare, R. W. & Scott, R. K. (2000). Effect of sowing date on the optimum plant density of winter wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 137, 179188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söchting, H. P., Gummert, A. & Zwerger, P. (2008). Emergence and development of volunteer oilseed rape in winter oilseed rape stands. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 21, (Sp Iss), 303308.Google Scholar
Squire, G. R., Begg, G. S. & Askew, M. (2003). The Potential for Oilseed Rape Feral (Volunteer) Weeds to Cause Impurities in Later Oilseed Rape Crops. Final Report of the DEFRA Project: Consequences for Agriculture of the Introduction of Genetically Modified Crops, RG0114. London: Defra.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Makepeace, R. J. (1984). A code for stages of development in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Aspects of Applied Biology 6, 399419.Google Scholar
VSN International (2011). GenStat for Windows, 14th edn, Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International.Google Scholar
Whaley, J. M., Sparkes, D. L., Foulkes, M. J., Spink, J. H., Semere, T. & Scott, R. K. (2000). The physiological response of winter wheat to reductions in plant density. Annals of Applied Biology 137, 167178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar